Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Al-Azem, Talal, author"
Sort by:
Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the Madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Quٍtlهubughهa's commentary on the compendium of Qudهurهi
\"[The author] argues for the existence of a madhhab-law tradition of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation (tarjهiٍh) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent (taqlهid). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quٍtlهubughهa's (d. 879/1474) al-Taٍsٍhهih wa-al-tarjهiٍh, Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the ٍHanafهi madhhab, analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab-law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system.\"-- Back cover.
Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the Madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Quṭlūbughā's commentary on the compendium of Qudūrī
by
Al-Azem, Talal
in
Hanafites
,
Ibn Qutlubugha, al-Qasim ibn Abd Allah, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475
,
Ibn Quṭlūbughā, al-Qāsim ibn ʻAbd Allāh, 1399 or 1400-1474 or 1475
2017,2016
In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition, Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a 'madhhab-law tradition' of jurisprudence, and examines how legal rules were forged by generations of scholarly commentary.