Explore the vast range of titles available.

Inclusion body myositis is the most common acquired myopathy after the age of 50. It is characterized by progressive asymmetric weakness predominantly affecting the quadriceps and/or finger flexors. Loss of ambulation and dysphagia are major complications of the disease. Inclusion body myositis can be associated with cytosolic 5′-nucleotidase 1A antibodies. Muscle biopsy usually shows inflammatory cells surrounding and invading non-necrotic muscle fibers, rimmed vacuoles, congophilic inclusions, and protein aggregates. Disease pathogenesis remains poorly understood and consists of an interplay between inflammatory and degenerative pathways. Antigen-driven, clonally restricted, cytotoxic T cells represent a main feature of the inflammatory component, whereas abnormal protein homeostasis with protein misfolding, aggregation, and dysfunctional protein disposal is the hallmark of the degenerative component. Inclusion body myositis remains refractory to treatment. Better understanding of the disease pathogenesis led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets, addressing both the inflammatory and degenerative pathways.

The MU School of Medicine is a pioneer in medical education from its founding as the first publicly supported medical school west of the Mississippi River to the creation of its patient-based learning curriculum. The transformation of neurosurgery and radiation oncology to become new departments is part of our strategy to make MU, our medical school, and the academic health system a leader in these key areas. The MU School of Medicine is a pioneer in medical education from its founding as the first publicly supported medical school west of the Mississippi River to the creation of its patient-based learning (PBL) curriculum.

Non-dystrophic myotonias are skeletal muscle channelopathies caused by ion channel dysfunction. Symptom onset is frequently in the first decade of life, causing disability in a young cohort. Although there is no cure, symptomatic treatments exist. Previous trials provide evidence of the efficacy of mexiletine. More recently, lamotrigine has been shown to be effective. Both treatments have different profiles, including pharmacokinetics and adverse events. This trial aimed to investigate whether lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine to directly inform clinical practice. We did a randomised, double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (London, UK). Participants (aged ≥18 years) who had genetically confirmed symptomatic non-dystrophic myotonia were randomly assigned (1:1), by means of a block randomisation schedule created by a computer program, to receive either mexiletine for 8 weeks followed by lamotrigine for 8 weeks, or lamotrigine followed by mexiletine, with a 7-day washout period in between. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the mean interactive voice response (IVR) diary stiffness score (0–9 scale) over the participant's final 2 weeks of diary reporting in each treatment period. Non-inferiority was assessed using a mixed-effects model with a predefined margin of 0·5 and included all randomly assigned participants who contributed at least 7 days of IVR-diary data in either treatment period. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05017155, and EudraCT, 2020-003375-17. Between Aug 1, 2021, and Dec 12, 2022, of 60 participants were screened (24 females and 36 males) and randomly assigned between Aug 1, 2021 and Dec 12, 2022, to either the mexiletine–lamotrigine sequence (n=30) or the lamotrigine–mexiletine sequence (n=30). 53 participants contributed data to the primary analysis. The mean IVR stiffness score after treatment with mexiletine was 2·54 (95% CI 1·98 to 3·10) versus 2·77 (2·21 to 3·32) with lamotrigine (mean mexiletine–lamotrigine difference −0·23 [95% CI −0·63 to 0·17]). The most common adverse event with both treatments was indigestion–reflux (eight participants, 208 participant-days receiving mexiletine; seven participants, 130 participant-days receiving lamotrigine). No serious adverse events were reported. We were unable to conclude that lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine; however, improvements in all outcome measures from baseline were similar between lamotrigine and mexiletine. Lamotrigine is an important treatment consideration in non-dystrophic myotonias alongside mexiletine; we propose a treatment algorithm to guide clinical practice. Neuromuscular Study Group, Jon Moulton Charity Trust, UCLH BRC Fast Track Grant.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients lack effective treatments to maintain motor and neuromuscular function. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a home-based exercise program on muscle strength, ALS scores, and transcriptome in ALS patients, Clinical Trials.gov #NCT03201991 (28/06/2017). An open-label, non-randomized pilot clinical trial was conducted in seven individuals with early-stage ALS. Participants were given 3 months of home-based resistance exercise focusing on the quadriceps muscles. The strength of exercised muscle was evaluated using bilateral quadriceps strength with manual muscle testing, handheld dynamometers, five times sit-to-stand, and Timed-Up-and-Go before and after the exercise program. In addition, changes in the Sickness Impact Profile ALS-19 (SIP/ALS-19) as the functional outcome measure and the transcriptome of exercised muscles were compared before and after the exercise. The primary outcome of muscle strength did not change significantly by the exercise program. The exercise program maintained the SIP/ALS-19 and the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Transcriptome analysis revealed that exercise reverted the expression level of genes decreased in ALS, including parvalbumin. Three months of moderately intense strength and conditioning exercise maintained muscle strength of the exercised muscle and ALSFRS-R scores and had a positive effect on patients’ muscle transcriptome.

Purpose: This preliminary study on lingual-alveolar contact pressures (LACP) in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) had several aims: (a) to evaluate whether the protocol induced fatigue, (b) to compare LACP during speech (LACP-Sp) and during maximum isometric pressing (LACP-Max) in people with ALS (PALS) versus healthy controls, (c) to compare the percentage of LACP-Max utilized during speech (%Max) for PALS versus controls, and (d) to evaluate relationships between LACP-Sp and LACP-Max with word intelligibility. Method: Thirteen PALS and 12 healthy volunteers produced /t, d, s, z, l, n/ sounds while LACP-Sp was recorded. LACP-Max was obtained before and after the speech protocol. Word intelligibility was obtained from auditory-perceptual judgments. Results: LACP-Max values measured before and after completion of the speech protocol did not differ. LACP-Sp and LACP-Max were statistically lower in the ALS bulbar group compared with controls and PALS with only spinal symptoms. There was no statistical difference between groups for %Max. LACP-Sp and LACP-Max were correlated with word intelligibility. Conclusions: It was feasible to obtain LACP-Sp measures without inducing fatigue. Reductions in LACP-Sp and LACP-Max for bulbar speakers might reflect tongue weakness. Although confirmation of results is needed, the data indicate that individuals with high word intelligibility maintained LACP-Sp at or above 2 kPa and LACP-Max at or above 50 kPa.

Background and purpose Rasagiline might be disease modifying in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The aim was to evaluate the effect of rasagiline 2 mg/day on neurofilament light chain (NfL), a prognostic biomarker in ALS. Methods In 65 patients with ALS randomized in a 3:1 ratio to rasagiline 2 mg/day (n = 48) or placebo (n = 17) in a completed randomized controlled multicentre trial, NfL levels in plasma were measured at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Longitudinal changes in NfL levels were evaluated regarding treatment and clinical parameters. Results Baseline NfL levels did not differ between the study arms and correlated with disease progression rates both pre‐baseline (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and during the study (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). NfL measured at months 6 and 12 did not change significantly from baseline in both arms, with a median individual NfL change of +1.4 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] −5.6, 14.2) across all follow‐up time points. However, a significant difference in NfL change at month 12 was observed between patients with high and low NfL baseline levels treated with rasagiline (high [n = 13], −6.9 pg/mL, IQR −20.4, 6.0; low [n = 18], +5.9 pg/mL, IQR −1.4, 19.7; p = 0.025). Additionally, generally higher longitudinal NfL variability was observed in patients with high baseline levels, whereas disease progression rates and disease duration at baseline had no impact on the longitudinal NfL course. Conclusion Post hoc NfL measurements in completed clinical trials are helpful in interpreting NfL data from ongoing and future interventional trials and could provide hypothesis‐generating complementary insights. Further studies are warranted to ultimately differentiate NfL response to treatment from other factors.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the validity, reliability, responsiveness and meaningful change threshold of the Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM) Functional Rating Scale (FRS).MethodsData from a large 20-month multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in IBM were used. Convergent validity was tested using Spearman correlation with other health outcomes. Discriminant (known groups) validity was assessed using standardised effect sizes (SES). Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s alpha. Intrarater reliability in stable patients and equivalence of face-to-face and telephone administration were tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Responsiveness was assessed using standardised response mean (SRM). A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve anchor-based approach was used to determine clinically meaningful IBMFRS change.ResultsAmong the 150 patients, mean (SD) IBMFRS total score was 27.4 (4.6). Convergent validity was supported by medium to large correlations (rs modulus: 0.42–0.79) and discriminant validity by moderate to large group differences (SES=0.51–1.59). Internal consistency was adequate (overall Cronbach’s alpha: 0.79). Test–retest reliability (ICCs=0.84–0.87) and reliability of telephone versus face-to-face administration (ICCs=0.93–0.95) were excellent, with Bland-Altman plots showing good agreement. Responsiveness in the worsened group defined by various external constructs was large at both 12 (SRM=−0.76 to −1.49) and 20 months (SRM=−1.12 to −1.57). In ROC curve analysis, a drop in at least two IBMFRS total score points was shown to represent a meaningful decline.ConclusionsWhen administered by trained raters, the IBMFRS is a reliable, valid and responsive tool that can be used to evaluate the impact of IBM and its treatment on physical function, with a 2-point reduction representing meaningful decline.Trial registration numberNCT02753530.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains a devastating motor neuron disease with limited treatment options. Oxaloacetate treatment has a neuroprotective effect in rodent models of seizure and neurodegeneration. Therefore, we treated the ALS model superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) G93A mice with oxaloacetate and evaluated their neuromuscular function and lifespan. Treatment with oxaloacetate beginning in the presymptomatic stage significantly improved neuromuscular strength measured during the symptomatic stage in the injected mice compared to the non-treated group. Oxaloacetate treatment starting in the symptomatic stage significantly delayed limb paralysis compared with the non-treated group. For lifespan analysis, oxaloacetate treatment did not show a statistically significant positive effect, but the treatment did not shorten the lifespan. Mechanistically, SOD1 G93A mice showed increased levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and peroxisome proliferative activated receptor gamma coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) mRNAs in the spinal cord. However, oxaloacetate treatment reverted these abnormal levels to that of wild-type mice. Similarly, the altered expression level of total NF-κB protein returned to that of wild-type mice with oxaloacetate treatment. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of oxaloacetate treatment in SOD1 G93A mice may reflect the effects on neuroinflammation or bioenergetic stress.

Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is a neurodegenerative disorder of the adult motor system. Characterised by a slowly progressive upper motor neuron syndrome, the diagnosis is clinical, after exclusion of structural, neurodegenerative and metabolic mimics. Differentiation of PLS from upper motor neuron-predominant forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis remains a significant challenge in the early symptomatic phase of both disorders, with ongoing debate as to whether they form a clinical and histopathological continuum. Current diagnostic criteria for PLS may be a barrier to therapeutic development, requiring long delays between symptom onset and formal diagnosis. While new technologies sensitive to both upper and lower motor neuron involvement may ultimately resolve controversies in the diagnosis of PLS, we present updated consensus diagnostic criteria with the aim of reducing diagnostic delay, optimising therapeutic trial design and catalysing the development of disease-modifying therapy.

Minocycline has anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, and extends survival in mouse models of some neurological conditions. Several trials are planned or are in progress to assess whether minocycline slows human neurodegeneration. We aimed to test the efficacy of minocycline as a treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We did a multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled phase III trial. After a 4-month lead-in phase, 412 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or minocycline in escalating doses of up to 400 mg/day for 9 months. The primary outcome measure was the difference in rate of change in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). Secondary outcome measures were forced vital capacity (FVC), manual muscle testing (MMT), quality of life, survival, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00047723. ALSFRS-R score deterioration was faster in the minocycline group than in the placebo group (−1·30 vs −1·04 units/month, 95% CI for difference −0·44 to −0·08; p=0·005). Patients on minocycline also had non-significant tendencies towards faster decline in FVC (−3·48 vs −3·01, −1·03 to 0·11; p=0·11) and MMT score (−0·30 vs −0·26, −0·08 to 0·01; p=0·11), and greater mortality during the 9-month treatment phase (hazard ratio=1·32, 95% CI 0·83 to 2·10; p=0·23) than did patients on placebo. Quality-of-life scores did not differ between the treatment groups. Non-serious gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events were more common in the minocycline group than in the placebo group, but these events were not significantly related to the decline in ALSFRS-R score. Our finding that minocycline has a harmful effect on patients with ALS has implications for trials of minocycline in patients with other neurological disorders, and for how potential neuroprotective agents are screened for use in patients with ALS.