Explore the vast range of titles available.

Isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHs) catalyse oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). IDH1 functions in the cytosol and peroxisomes, whereas IDH2 and IDH3 are both localized in the mitochondria. Heterozygous somatic mutations in IDH1 occur at codon 132 in 70% of grade II-III gliomas and secondary glioblastomas (GBMs), and in 5% of primary GBMs. Mutations in IDH2 at codon 172 are present in grade II-III gliomas at a low frequency. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations cause both loss of normal enzyme function and gain-of-function, causing reduction of α-KG to D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) which accumulates. Excess hydroxyglutarate (2HG) can also be caused by germline mutations in D- and L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenases (D2HGDH and L2HGDH). If loss of IDH function is critical for tumourigenesis, we might expect some tumours to acquire somatic IDH3 mutations. Alternatively, if 2HG accumulation is critical, some tumours might acquire somatic D2HGDH or L2HGDH mutations. We therefore screened 47 glioblastoma samples looking for changes in these genes. Although IDH1 R132H was identified in 12% of samples, no mutations were identified in any of the other genes. This suggests that mutations in IDH3, D2HGDH and L2HGDH do not occur at an appreciable frequency in GBM. One explanation is simply that mono-allelic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations occur more frequently by chance than the bi-allelic mutations expected at IDH3, D2HGDH and L2HGDH. Alternatively, both loss of IDH function and 2HG accumulation might be required for tumourigenesis, and only IDH1 and IDH2 mutations have these dual effects.

Cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, failed to show benefit over lomustine in relapsed glioblastoma. One resistance mechanism for cediranib is up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This study aimed to determine if dual therapy with cediranib and the oral EGFR inhibitor gefitinib improved outcome in recurrent glioblastoma. This was a multi-center randomized, two-armed, double-blinded phase II study comparing cediranib plus gefitinib versus cediranib plus placebo in subjects with first relapse/first progression of glioblastoma following surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and radiologic response rate. Recruitment was terminated early following suspension of the cediranib program. 38 subjects (112 planned) were enrolled with 19 subjects in each treatment arm. Median PFS with cediranib plus gefitinib was 3.6 months compared to 2.8 months for cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.72, 90% CI; 0.41 to 1.26). Median OS was 7.2 months with cediranib plus gefitinib and 5.5 months with cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.68, 90% CI; 0.39 to 1.19). Eight subjects (42%) had a partial response in the cediranib plus gefitinib arm versus five patients (26%) in the cediranib plus placebo arm. Cediranib and gefitinib in combination is tolerated in patients with glioblastoma. Incomplete recruitment led to the study being underpowered. However, a trend towards improved survival and response rates with the addition of gefitinib to cediranib was observed. Further studies of the combination incorporating EGFR and VEGF inhibition are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310855.

Isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHs) catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). Somatic mutations in genes encoding IDH1 and IDH2 were first identified in glioma and subsequently in acute myeloid leukemia and other solid tumors. These heterozygous point mutations occur at the arginine residue of the enzyme s active site and cause both loss of normal enzyme function and gain of function, causing reduction of α-KG to D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which accumulates. D-2-hydroxyglutarate may act as an oncometabolite through the inhibition of various α-KG-dependent enzymes, stimulating angiogenesis, histone modifications and aberrant DNA methylation. Possibly, IDH mutations may also cause oncogenic effects through dysregulation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, or by increasing susceptibility to oxidative stress. Clinically, IDH mutations may be useful diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and it is anticipated that a better understanding of the pathogenesis of IDH mutations will enable IDH-directed therapies to be developed in the future.

Background Bone metastases are associated with a worse outcome in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Tumour overexpression of C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) appears predictive of skeletal involvement. We investigated the role of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and CXCR4 expression on CTCs as potential predictors of skeleton invasion. Methods Blood from patients with metastatic bronchial, midgut or pancreatic NET (pNET) was analysed by CellSearch. CXCR4 immunohistochemistry was performed on matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Results Two hundred and fifty-four patients were recruited with 121 midgut and 119 pNETs, of which 51 and 36% had detectable CTCs, respectively. Bone metastases were reported in 30% of midgut and 23% of pNET patients and were significantly associated with CTC presence ( p  = 0.003 and p  < 0.0001). In a subgroup of 40 patients, 85% patients with CTCs had CTCs positive for CXCR4 expression. The proportion of CXCR4-positive CTCs in patients with bone metastases was 56% compared to 35% in those without ( p  = 0.18) it. Staining for CXCR4 on matched FFPE tissue showed a trend towards a correlation with CXCR4 expression on CTCs ( p  = 0.08). Conclusions CTC presence is associated with bone metastases in NETs. CXCR4 may be involved in CTC osteotropism and present a therapeutic target to reduce skeletal morbidity.

AimsThe Medical Research Council OVO5/EORTC 55955 trial showed that patients in remission after first-line therapy for ovarian cancer did not benefit from routine measurement of CA125 during follow-up. Since the presentation of these results, we have counseled patients about the options for follow-up and provided them with an information leaflet about the trial results and the symptoms that should prompt an early appointment and CA125 measurement. We present an audit of practice after the presentation of those results.MethodsThe medical records of 143 consecutive patients completing first-line therapy for epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in our unit between July 2009 and December 2013 were analyzed.ResultsAn agreed plan of CA125 follow-up was recorded in 69 (79%) of 87 eligible patients on completion of first-line therapy. No routine CA125 follow-up was selected by 55 (80%) patients, and routine CA125 follow-up was selected by 14 (20%), of whom 3 wished not to be informed of the results. CA125 levels were checked in 28 (51%) patients in the no routine CA125 follow-up group, in 26 cases because of the development of symptoms. Relapse was confirmed in 22. Median follow-up was 360 days (range, 100–836). CA125 levels were checked in all 14 patients who had requested routine CA125 follow-up. Relapse has been confirmed in 2 patients. Median follow-up was 560 days (range, 500–620).ConclusionsIf patients are given sufficient information about the role of routine CA125 measurements during follow-up, the majority decide against CA125 monitoring and hence, avoid these blood tests.

The main subject of my thesis is the investigation of mechanisms of glioma tumorigenesis associated with the recently identified mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase. Gliomas account for 80% of primary brain cancers. They represent a diverse group of tumours, and are graded from I-IV based on histopathological features. Whilst grade I tumours may be curable with surgery alone, grade II and III gliomas inevitably progress to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which is highly resistant to current therapies and carries a very poor prognosis. Despite an improved understanding of the pathways and mechanisms involved in the development of glioma and its progression to grade IV disease, current and novel treatments have so far failed to significantly improve outcome. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzymes catalyse the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). Somatic mutations in genes encoding IDH1 and IDH2 were first identified in glioma and subsequently in acute myeloid leukemia and other solid tumours. These heterozygous point mutations occur at the arginine residue of the enzymes active site and cause both loss of normal enzyme function and gain-of-function, causing the reduction of α-KG to D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG), which accumulates. D-2HG may act as an oncometabolite through the inhibition of various α-KG dependent enzymes, stimulating angiogenesis, histone modifications and aberrant DNA methylation. Possibly, IDH1/2 mutations may also cause oncogenic effects through dysregulation of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, or by increasing susceptibility to oxidative stress. The exact role of mutant IDH1/2 in tumorigenesis however remains unclear. In the work outlined in this thesis, I have demonstrated that the expression of mutant IDH1/2 in glioma cell lines leads to 2-HG accumultation and a reduction in α-KG production and results in HIF1α accumulation and a reduction in 5hmC production. Furthermore, the brain-specific expression of mutant Idh1 in mice also results in 2-HG accumulation and reduced α-KG production, whilst a reduction in 5hmC levels are also seen. This data appears to support the theory that IDH1/2 mutant activity results in the inhibition of α-KG dependent enzymes, either through the accumulation of 2-HG or due to a reduction in α-KG levels. The brain-specific expression of mutant Idh1 in mice also results in increased cellular proliferation and an increase in the expression of the neural stem cell marker, nestin. However gliomas do not develop, perhaps suggesting that additional mutations are required in conjunction with those occuring in IDH1/2 in order to initiate tumourigenesis. Clinically, IDH1/2 mutations may represent a novel therapeutic target in glioma and may also serve as useful diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers. However, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of mutant IDH is required, to enable effective IDH1/2 directed therapies to be developed in the future.

There has been very little progress in improving outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) over the past few decades. High-throughput array profiling has made it possible to discover new assays to diagnose or prognose PDAC more accurately based on the genetic profile of an individual tumor. To improve patient survival, there is a need to extract the most practical data to define tumor subgroups and personalize anticancer therapy. In the evaluated study, a multiplatform, survival-based analysis of molecular changes was performed for PDAC to discover clinically useful biomarkers. A composite score predictive for survival was calculated for individual genes, taking into account the DNA copy-number and any regulation by miRNAs. Several genes involved in the PI3K/AKT and SRC signaling pathways were identified and further investigated.

Mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancers have high mutation loads and many respond to immune checkpoint-inhibitors. We investigated how genetic and immune landscapes co-evolve in these tumors. All cases had high truncal mutation loads. Driver aberrations showed a clear hierarchy despite pervasive intratumor heterogeneity: Those in WNT/βCatenin, mitogen-activated protein kinase and TGFβ receptor family genes were almost always truncal. Immune evasion drivers were predominantly subclonal and showed parallel evolution. Pan-tumor evolution, subclonal evolution, and evolutionary stasis of genetic immune evasion drivers defined three MMRd CRC subtypes with distinct T-cell infiltrates. These immune evasion drivers have been implicated in checkpoint-inhibitor resistance. Clonality and subtype assessments are hence critical for predictive immunotherapy biomarker development. Cancer cell PD-L1 expression was conditional on loss of the intestinal homeobox transcription factor CDX2. This explains infrequent PD-L1 expression by cancer cells and likely contributes to the high recurrence risk of MMRd CRCs with impaired CDX2 expression. Competing Interest Statement MG receives research funding from Merck KG and Bristol Myers Squibb. DC receives research funding from Astra Zeneca, Clovis, Eli Lilly, 4SC, Bayer, Celegene and Roche and is on the advisor board of OVIBIO. DL is the recipient of the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group/Merck Clinical Research Fellowship. NM is on the advisory board for BMS, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche and the Speakers' bureau for Merck, Pfizer and Roche. JR-B receives travel and accommodation expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, PharmaMar and Roche; honoraria for educational activities from Pfizer and Roche; honoraria for consultancy from Boehringer Ingelheim; and institutional research funding from Roche. KS receives travel, accommodation, national/international meetings registration and consultancy renumeration from BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Guardant Health, Innovent Biologics, Merck KG, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Roche, Servier; and Institutional funding for trials and research at UCLH from Adaptimmune Therapeutics, BMS, Merck KGaA, MSD, Roche.