Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
31 result(s) for "Messmer, Anna S."
Sort by:
The critical role of timely medical emergency team activation in oncological and non-oncological patients
This study aimed to analyse the impact of time from first physiological derangement (positive Vital Sign Score, VSS) to Medical Emergency Team (MET) activation on mortality in oncological versus non-oncological patients. All in-hospital patients requiring a MET assessment were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Subanalyses were performed for the population that was admitted to the ICU as well as the subgroups of oncological with solid vs. haematological cancer. In addition, we assessed the number and time points of VSS measurements in oncological and non-oncological patients. 286 out of 4068 (8.9%) documented MET calls were attributed to oncological patients. Each hour delay from first abnormal VSS to MET activation was associated with an 3% increase in adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality odds (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05, p < 0.001), independent of oncological status (interaction p = 0.141). Oncological patients had a significantly higher number of vital sign measurements on the ward (median 24 [16-37] vs 18 [10-27], p < 0.001) before MET activation, and higher 30-day all-cause mortality (38.1% vs 21.8%, p < 0.001). Although the overall outcome did not differ between, oncological patients comprised 10% of MET calls, had higher mortality and had significantly more frequent vital sign monitoring, reflecting greater clinical concern. Tailored monitoring including early MET review has potential to improve outcomes particularly in high-risk oncological patients.
The association of midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) at ICU admission and fluid overload in patients post elective cardiac surgery
Postoperative fluid overload (FO) after cardiac surgery is common and affects recovery. Predicting FO could help optimize fluid management. This post-hoc analysis of the HERACLES randomized controlled trial evaluated the predictive value of MR-proADM for FO post-cardiac surgery. MR-proADM levels were measured at four different timepoints in 33 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into FO (> 5% weight gain) and no-FO at ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the predictive power of MR-proADM at ICU admission for FO at discharge. Secondary outcomes included the predictive value of MR-proADM for FO on day 6 post-surgery and changes over time. The association between MR-proADM and FO at ICU discharge or day 6 post-surgery was not significant (crude odds ratio (cOR): 4.3 (95% CI 0.5–40.9, p  = 0.201) and cOR 1.1 (95% CI 0.04–28.3, p  = 0.954)). MR-proADM levels over time did not differ significantly between patients with and without FO at ICU discharge ( p  = 0.803). MR-proADM at ICU admission was not associated with fluid overload at ICU discharge in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. MR-proADM levels over time were not significantly different between groups, although elevated levels were observed in patients with FO.
The effect of dexmedetomidine on vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation SPICE III Trial
Background Septic shock is associated with decreased vasopressor responsiveness. Experimental data suggest that central alpha2-agonists like dexmedetomidine (DEX) increase vasopressor responsiveness and reduce catecholamine requirements in septic shock. However, DEX may also cause hypotension and bradycardia. Thus, it remains unclear whether DEX is hemodynamically safe or helpful in this setting. Methods In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE III) trial, an international randomized trial comparing early sedation with dexmedetomidine to usual care in critically patients receiving mechanical ventilation, we studied patients with septic shock admitted to two tertiary ICUs in Australia and Switzerland. The primary outcome was vasopressor requirements in the first 48 h after randomization, expressed as noradrenaline equivalent dose (NEq [μg/kg/min] = noradrenaline + adrenaline + vasopressin/0.4). Results Between November 2013 and February 2018, 417 patients were recruited into the SPICE III trial at both sites. Eighty-three patients with septic shock were included in this subgroup analysis. Of these, 44 (53%) received DEX and 39 (47%) usual care. Vasopressor requirements in the first 48 h were similar between the two groups. Median NEq dose was 0.03 [0.01, 0.07] μg/kg/min in the DEX group and 0.04 [0.01, 0.16] μg/kg/min in the usual care group ( p  = 0.17). However, patients in the DEX group had a lower NEq/MAP ratio, indicating lower vasopressor requirements to maintain the target MAP. Moreover, on adjusted multivariable analysis, higher dexmedetomidine dose was associated with a lower NEq/MAP ratio. Conclusions In critically ill patients with septic shock, patients in the DEX group received similar vasopressor doses in the first 48 h compared to the usual care group. On multivariable adjusted analysis, dexmedetomidine appeared to be associated with lower vasopressor requirements to maintain the target MAP. Trial registration The SPICE III trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01728558 ).
Influence of fluid accumulation on major adverse kidney events in critically ill patients – an observational cohort study
Background Fluid accumulation (FA) is known to be associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) during intensive care unit (ICU) stay but data on mid-term renal outcome is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between FA at ICU day 3 and major adverse kidney events in the first 30 days after ICU admission (MAKE30). Methods Retrospective, single-center cohort study including adult ICU patients with sufficient data to compute FA and MAKE30. We defined FA as a positive cumulative fluid balance greater than 5% of bodyweight. The association between FA and MAKE30, including its sub-components, as well as the serum creatinine trajectories during ICU stay were examined. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis for the stage of AKI and the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Results Out of 13,326 included patients, 1,100 (8.3%) met the FA definition. FA at ICU day 3 was significantly associated with MAKE30 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67–2.30; p  < 0.001) and all sub-components: need for renal replacement therapy (aOR 3.83; 95%CI 3.02–4.84), persistent renal dysfunction (aOR 1.72; 95%CI 1.40–2.12), and 30-day mortality (aOR 1.70; 95%CI 1.38–2.09), p all < 0.001. The sensitivity analysis showed an association of FA with MAKE30 independent from a pre-existing CKD, but exclusively in patients with AKI stage 3. Furthermore, FA was independently associated with the creatinine trajectory over the whole observation period. Conclusions Fluid accumulation is significantly associated with MAKE30 in critically ill patients. This association is independent from pre-existing CKD and strongest in patients with AKI stage 3.
CRYSTALLBrain: crystalloid fluid choice and neurological outcome in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage—a study protocol for a multi-centre randomised double-blind clinical trial
Background Vasospasms are common in patients presenting with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and are the main contributor to long-term disability or death in these patients. The key immediate management of vasospasms is the improvement of brain perfusion by the administration of intravenous fluid and vasopressors if needed. Yet, there is no clear recommendation regarding the choice of fluid in this particular patient population. Data suggests a survival benefit using normal saline in patients with TBI; however, its impact on outcomes in patients with SAH is lacking. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of normal saline reduces clinically relevant vasospasms compared to Ringer’s lactate in patients with SAH. Methods Patients presenting with non-traumatic SAH will be randomised 1:1 to normal saline or Ringer’s lactate group. Blinded study fluid will be used exclusively for resuscitation and maintenance until ICU/IMC discharge or a maximum of 14 days, whichever occurs first. Management of vasospasms and general management of the SAH patient will be according to the clinic standard of care. Primary endpoint is the occurrence of clinically relevant vasospasms. Key secondary outcomes include mortality, severity and treatment of vasospasms, and neurological outcomes at 90 days. Discussion The proposed randomised controlled trial offers a safe, non-invasive way to gain insights about crystalloid fluid choice in SAH patients, with potential to improve outcomes in this critically ill patient group. This study could establish a new gold standard in fluid therapy for neuro-critical care. Trial registration The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (date of registration 18 June 2021) and on the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal, SNCTP000004575.
Fluid overload and mortality in critically ill patients with severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock–An observational cohort study
ObjectivePatients with heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock are especially prone to the negative effects of fluid overload (FO); however, fluid resuscitation in respective patients is sometimes necessary resulting in FO. We aimed to study the association of FO at ICU discharge with 30-day mortality in patients admitted to the ICU due to severe heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock.MethodsRetrospective, single-center cohort study. Patients with admission diagnoses of severe HF and/or cardiogenic shock were eligible. The following exclusion criteria were applied: (I) patients younger than 16 years, (II) patients admitted to our intermediate care unit, and (III) patients with incomplete data to determine FO at ICU discharge. We used a cumulative weight-adjusted definition of fluid balance and defined more than 5% as FO. The data were analyzed by univariate and adjusted univariate logistic regression.ResultsWe included 2,158 patients in our analysis. 185 patients (8.6%) were fluid overloaded at ICU discharge. The mean FO in the FO group was 7.2% [interquartile range (IQR) 5.8–10%]. In patients with FO at ICU discharge, 30-day mortality was 22.7% compared to 11.7% in non-FO patients ( p < 0.001). In adjusted univariate logistic regression, we did not observe any association of FO at discharge with 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–2.71, p = 0.2]. No association between FO and 30-day mortality was found in the subgroups with HF only or cardiogenic shock (all p > 0.05). Baseline lactate (adjusted OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.13–1.42; p < 0.001) and cardiac surgery at admission (adjusted OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.0–3.76; p = 0.05) were the main associated factors with FO at ICU discharge.ConclusionIn patients admitted to the ICU due to severe HF and/or cardiogenic shock, FO at ICU discharge seems not to be associated with 30-day mortality.
Editorial: Fluid overload in the critically ill
Lower blood pressures via afterload reduction may have unloading benefits, but low preload and low blood pressures may also reduce coronary flow. [...]hemodynamic changes can be both beneficial and detrimental in this patient population. Conflict of interest AM is affiliated with the Department of Intensive Care at University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, which report grants from Orion Pharma, Abbott Nutrition International, B. Braun Medical AG, CSEM AG, Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH, Kenta Biotech Ltd, Maquet Critical Care AB, Omnicare Clinical Research AG, Nestle, Pierre Fabre Pharma AG, Pfizer, Bard Medica S.A., Abbott AG, Anandic Medical Systems, Pan Gas AG Healthcare, Bracco, Hamilton Medical AG, Fresenius Kabi, Getinge Group Maquet AG, Dräger AG, Teleflex Medical GmbH, Glaxo Smith Kline, Merck Sharp and Dohme AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Baxter, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, CSL Behring, Novartis, Covidien, Phagenesis, Cytel, and Nycomed. (2011)364:2483–95.10.1056/NEJMoa110154921715393 3.MessmerASZinggCMüllerMGerberJLSchefoldJCPfortmuellerCA.Fluid overload and mortality in adult critical care patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Crit Care Med.
Hypertonic saline for fluid resuscitation after cardiac surgery (HERACLES): study protocol for a preliminary randomised controlled clinical trial
Background Intraoperative and postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients is complex, involving the application of differential vasopressors and volume therapy. It has been shown that a positive fluid balance has a major impact on postoperative outcome. Today, the advantages and disadvantages of buffered crystalloid solutes are a topic of controversy, with no consensus being reached so far. The use of hypertonic saline (HS) has shown promising results with respect to lower total fluid balance and postoperative weight gain in critically ill patients in preliminary studies. However, collection of more data on HS in critically ill patients seems warranted. This preliminary study aims to investigate whether fluid resuscitation using HS in patients following cardiac surgery results in less total fluid volume being administered. Methods In a prospective double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial, we aim to recruit 96 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery for ischaemic and/or valvular heart disease. After postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), patients will be randomly assigned to receive 5 ml/kg ideal body weight HS (7.3% NaCl) or normal saline (NS, 0.9% NaCl) infused within 60 min. Blood and urine samples will be collected preoperatively and postoperatively up to day 6 to assess changes in renal, cardiac, inflammatory, acid-base, and electrolyte parameters. Additionally, we will perform renal ultrasonography studies to assess renal blood flow before, during, and after infusion, and we will measure total body water using preoperative and postoperative body composition analysis (bioimpedance). Patients will be followed up for 90 days. Discussion The key objective of this study is to assess the cumulative amount of fluid administered in the intervention (HS) group versus control (NS) group during the ICU stay. In this preliminary, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial we will test the hypothesis that use of HS results in less total fluids infused and less postoperative weight gain when compared to the standard of intensive care in cardiac surgery patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03280745 . Registered on 12 September 2017.
Hypertonic saline for fluid resuscitation in ICU patients post-cardiac surgery (HERACLES): a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
PurposeRecent evidence questions a liberal approach to fluid resuscitation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Here, we assess whether use of hypertonic saline applied as single infusion at ICU admission after cardiac surgery can reduce cumulative perioperative fluid volume.MethodsProspective randomized double-blind single-center clinical trial investigates effects of a single infusion of hypertonic saline (HS) versus normal saline (comparator). Primary endpoint was the cumulative amount of fluid administered in patients in the hypertonic saline versus the 0.9% saline groups (during ICU stay). Upon ICU admission, patients received a single infusion of 5 ml/kg body weight of 7.3% NaCl (or 0.9% NaCl) over 60 min. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery for elective valvular and/or coronary heart disease were included. Patients with advanced organ dysfunction, infection, and/or patients on chronic steroid medication were excluded.ResultsA total of 101 patients were randomized to receive the study intervention (HS n = 53, NS n = 48). Cumulative fluid intake on the ICU (primary endpoint) did not differ between the HS and the NS groups [median 3193 ml (IQR 2052–4333 ml) vs. 3345 ml (IQR 2332–5043 ml)]. Postoperative urinary output until ICU discharge was increased in HS-treated patients [median 2250 ml (IQR 1640–2690 ml) vs. 1545 ml (IQR 1087–1976 ml)], and ICU fluid balance was lower in the HS group when compared to the NS group [296 ml (IQR − 441 to 1412 ml) vs. 1137 ml (IQR 322–2660 ml)].ConclusionIn a monocentric prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial, we observed that hypertonic saline did not reduce the total fluid volume administered on the ICU in critically ill cardiac surgery patients. Hypertonic saline infusion was associated with timely increase in urinary output. Variations in electrolyte and acid–base homeostasis were transient, but substantial in all patients.
Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness—A Machine Learning Approach
Background: The detrimental impact of fluid overload (FO) on intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality is well known. However, research to identify subgroups of patients particularly prone to fluid overload is scarce. The aim of this cohort study was to derive “FO phenotypes” in the critically ill by using machine learning techniques. Methods: Retrospective single center study including adult intensive care patients with a length of stay of ≥3 days and sufficient data to compute FO. Data was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, fast and frugal trees (FFT), classification decision trees (DT), and a random forest (RF) model. Results: Out of 1772 included patients, 387 (21.8%) met the FO definition. The random forest model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.86), followed by multivariable logistic regression (0.81, 95% CI 0.77–0.86), FFT (0.75, 95% CI 0.69–0.79) and DT (0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.78) to predict FO. The most important predictors identified in all models were lactate and bicarbonate at admission and postsurgical ICU admission. Sepsis/septic shock was identified as a risk factor in the MV and RF analysis. Conclusion: The FO phenotypes consist of patients admitted after surgery or with sepsis/septic shock with high lactate and low bicarbonate.