Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) usually have a dismal prognosis, and even after curative resection most patients will have disease relapse and ultimately die. Nonetheless, adjuvant chemotherapy has considerably improved the outcomes of patients who are able to undergo surgery. The PREOPANC trial provides some evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable PDACs but not, as claimed, for those with resectable tumours.

Background A major molecular pathway of genetic instability in cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficiency. High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is currently the best predictor of responsiveness towards immune checkpoint blockade. Data about the prevalence of high-level microsatellite instability in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been conflicting. Methods We employed a cohort comprising 308 Western-world, non-liver fluke-associated CCAs (159 intrahepatic, 106 perihilar, and 43 distal). We analysed the mononucleotide microsatellite instability marker panel consisting of BAT25, BAT26, and CAT25 and detected MSI-H in 4/308 CCAs (1.3%). Results Patients affected by MSI-H CCA had mostly an atypical histomorphology ( p  = 0.004), showed a longer overall survival, although having a high tumour stage, and were of younger age. Correlation analysis of microsatellite instability status with tumour-infiltrating immune cells, MHC I, and PD-L1 expression in the same cholangiocarcinoma cohort showed higher numbers of CD8 + T cells, FOXP3 + regulatory T cells, CD20 + B cells and high or at least moderate MHC I expression levels in MSI-H CCAs. Conclusions Even though the overall number of MSI-H CCAs is low, the dismal prognosis of the disease and the therapeutic option of immune checkpoint blockade in the respective patients justify MSI testing of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in younger patients showing an atypical histomorphology.

Although surgery is a requirement for a potential cure from pancreatic cancer, it is usually diagnosed at a late stage, when surgical intervention is not straightforward. This Review article outlines the controversies surrounding the treatment options for patients with advanced-stage pancreatic cancer, from surgery through to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted agents and palliative care. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive cancers, and surgical resection is a requirement for a potential cure. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, either metastatic (50%) or locally advanced cancer (30%). Although palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic disease, management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma is controversial. Several treatment options, including extended surgical resections, neoadjuvant therapy with subsequent resections, as well as palliative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, should be considered. However, there is little evidence available to support treatment options for locally advanced disease. As valid predictive biomarkers for stratification of therapy are not available today, future trials need to define the role of the different treatment options. This Review summarizes the current evidence and discusses available treatment options for both locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Key Points Surgical resection of pancreatic cancer is a requirement for potential cure; the 5-year-survival after resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy is over 20% Locally advanced primarily irresectable pancreatic carcinomas should be treated with neoadjuvant treatment (chemoradiotherapy in most cases) to down-stage or even down-size the tumour to obtain the chance of secondary resection Borderline resectable pancreatic cancers can be treated by extended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant treatment regimens to achieve better tumour control before surgery are an alternative in these patients The FOLFIRINOX protocol and nab-paclitaxel are new therapy options that improve survival for patients with metastatic disease and a good performance status Recent advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of the disease raise the hope that a more-personalized therapy will be possible in the near future Centralization of the treatment of pancreatic cancer in high-volume hospitals reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality, and improves long-term oncological outcome

ObjectiveA detailed understanding of the molecular alterations in different forms of cholangiocarcinogenesis is crucial for a better understanding of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and may pave the way to early diagnosis and better treatment options.DesignWe analysed a clinicopathologically well-characterised patient cohort (n=54) with high-grade intraductal papillary (IPNB) or tubulopapillary (ITPN) neoplastic precursor lesions of the biliary tract and correlated the results with an independent non-IPNB/ITPN associated CCA cohort (n=294). The triplet sample set of non-neoplastic biliary epithelium, precursor and invasive CCA was analysed by next generation sequencing, DNA copy number and genome-wide methylation profiling.ResultsPatients with invasive CCA arising from IPNB/ITPN had better prognosis than patients with CCA not associated with IPNB/ITPN. ITPN was localised mostly intrahepatic, whereas IPNB was mostly of extrahepatic origin. IPNB/ITPN were equally associated with small-duct and large-duct type intrahepatic CCA. IPNB exhibited mutational profiles of extrahepatic CCA, while ITPN had significantly fewer mutations. Most mutations were shared between precursor lesions and corresponding invasive CCA but ROBO2 mutations occurred exclusively in invasive CCA and CTNNB1 mutations were mainly present in precursor lesions. In addition, IPNB and ITPN differed in their DNA methylation profiles and analyses of latent methylation components suggested that IPNB and ITPN may have different cells-of-origin.ConclusionIntegrative analysis revealed that IPNB and ITPN harbour distinct early genetic alterations, IPNB are enriched in mutations typical for extrahepatic CCA, whereas ITPN exhibited few genetic alterations and showed distinct epigenetic profiles. In conclusion, IPNB/ITPN may represent a distinctive, intermediate form of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinogenesis.

IntroductionCombined vascular endothelial growth factor/programmed death-ligand 1 blockade through atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) is the current standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A/B substantially improved objective response rates compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib; however, a majority of patients will still not respond to A/B. Strong scientific rationale and emerging clinical data suggest that faecal microbiota transfer (FMT) may improve antitumour immune response on PD-(L)1 blockade. Early trials in melanoma with FMT and reinduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICI) therapy in patients with anti-PD-1-refractory metastatic melanoma were reported in 2021 and demonstrated reinstatement of response to ICI therapy in many patients. Due to anatomical vicinity and the physiological relevance of the gut-liver axis, we hypothesise HCC to be a particularly attractive cancer entity to further assess a potential benefit of FMT in combination with ICI towards increased antitumour immunity. Additionally, HCC often occurs in patients with liver cirrhosis, where liver function is prognostically relevant. There is evidence that FMT may increase hepatic function and therefore could positively affect outcome in this patient population.Methods and analysisThis prospective, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial has been designed to assess immunogenicity and safety of FMT via INTESTIFIX 001 combined with A/B in advanced HCC in comparison to A/B with placebo. Primary endpoints are measured as tumour CD8+ T cell infiltration after 2 cycles of treatment with vancomycin, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001 in comparison to vancomycin-placebo, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001-placebo and safety of the therapeutic combination in advanced HCC. INTESTIFIX 001 is an encapsulated FMT preparation by healthy donors with a high alpha-diversity in their gut microbiome for oral administration, manufactured by the Cologne Microbiota Bank (CMB). Sample size was calculated to achieve a specific expected accuracy for the primary immunological endpoint. 48 subjects will be randomised to reach a goal of 42 usable measurements in the modified intention-to-treat set. Subjects will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to A/B or placebo (28 A/B, 14 placebo).Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by ethics committee review and the German Federal Ministry of Drugs and Medical Devices. The trial is registered under EU CT no. 2023-506887-15-00. The outcome of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and at international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT05690048.

Background Recent data suggest primary resection as the preferable approach in patients with signet ring cell gastric cancer (SRC). The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was to evaluate the influence of SRC on prognosis and response in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A total of 723 locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (cT3/4 N any) documented in a prospective database from two academic centers were classified according to the WHO definition for SRC (more than 50 % SRC) and analyzed for their association with response and prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment. Results A total of 235 tumors (32.5 %) contained SRC. Median survival of SRC was 26.3 compared with 46.6 months ( p  < 0.001) for non-SRC. SRC were significantly associated with female gender, gastric localization, advanced ypT and R1/2 categories, and lower risk of surgical complications and anastomotic leakage (each p  < 0.001). Clinical (21.1 vs. 33.7 %, p  = 0.001) and histopathological response (less than 10 % residual tumor: 16.3 vs. 28.9 %, p  < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in SRC. Clinical response ( p  = 0.003) and complete histopathological response (pCR) (3.4 %) ( p  = 0.003) were associated with improved prognosis in SRC. Clinical response, surgical complications, ypTN categories, but not SRC were independent prognostic factors in forward Cox regression analysis in R0 resected patients. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis was increased ( p  < 0.001), while local ( p  = 0.015) and distant metastases ( p  = 0.02) were less frequent than in non-SRC. Conclusions Prognosis of SRC is unfavorable. Although response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is rare in SRC, it is associated with improved outcome. Thus, chemotherapy might not generally be abandoned in SRC. A stratification based on SRC should be included in clinical trials.

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is an aggressive type of cancer with a dismal prognosis. Recent case reports have highlighted the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a promising target for individualized therapy in biliary tract cancer; however, current data on HER2 positivity in GBC is contradictory. This study aimed to assess the proportion of HER2 positivity and its clinical implications in a large and well-characterized European GBC cohort. HER2 status was determined in 186 cases of surgically resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma and a subset of coexistent high-grade biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN, n = 74) in accordance with the up-to-date consensus for HER2 testing in gastric cancer by immunohistochemistry and dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization. Positivity for HER2 was observed in 5.4% of all cases (n = 10). In those patients with concomitant high-grade BilIN, two of four positive samples also showed amplification in the precursor lesion, while in the two remaining cases, positivity was either confined to invasive tumor or high-grade BilIN, exclusively. Equivocal staining found in eleven cases was not accompanied by gene amplification. Staging of the HER2-positive group was significantly different from the HER2-negative group with most cases presenting at stage IV, paralleled by a trend towards decreased survival. One patient who received dual HER2 inhibition almost went into full clinical remission despite treatment initiation in a metastasized state. Our results reveal a low prevalence of HER2 positivity and highlight HER2 gene amplification as an early, potentially driving event in gallbladder carcinogenesis. Prospective standardized HER2 testing and randomized control studies are needed to prove clinical efficacy of targeted HER2 inhibition in GBC.

Background Activation of the oncogene yes-associated protein (YAP) is frequently detected in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA); however, the expression pattern and the functional impact of its paralogue WW domain-containing transcription regulator 1 (WWTR1; synonym: TAZ) are not well described in different CCA subtypes. Methods Immunohistochemical analysis of YAP and TAZ in iCCA and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA) cohorts was performed. YAP/TAZ shuttling and their functional impact on CCA cell lines were investigated. Target genes expression after combined YAP/TAZ inhibition was analyzed. Results Immunohistochemical analysis of iCCA and eCCA revealed YAP or TAZ positivity in up to 49.2%; however, oncogene co-expression was less frequent (up to 23%). In contrast, both proteins were jointly detectable in most CCA cell lines and showed nuclear/cytoplasmic shuttling in a cell density-dependent manner. Next to the pro-proliferative function of YAP/TAZ, both transcriptional co-activators cooperated in the regulation of a gene signature that indicated the presence of chromosomal instability (CIN). A correlation between YAP and the CIN marker phospho-H2A histone family member X (pH2AX) was particularly observed in tissues from iCCA and distal CCA (dCCA). The presence of the CIN genes in about 25% of iCCA was statistically associated with worse prognosis. Conclusions YAP and TAZ activation is not uncoupled from cell density in CCA cells and both factors cooperatively contribute to proliferation and expression of CIN-associated genes. The corresponding group of CCA patients is characterized by CIN and may benefit from YAP/TAZ-directed therapies.

Carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) is instrumental for conversion of ester-containing prodrugs in cancer treatment. Novel treatment strategies are exceedingly needed for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Here, we assessed CES2 expression by immunohistochemistry in a CCA cohort comprising 171 non-liver fluke associated, intrahepatic (n = 72) and extrahepatic (perihilar: n = 56; distal: n = 43) CCAs. Additionally, 80 samples of high-grade biliary intraepithelial neoplastic tissues and 158 corresponding samples of histological normal, non-neoplastic biliary tract tissues were included. CES2 expression was highest in non-neoplastic biliary tissue and significantly decreased in CCA. Patients showing any CES2 expression in tumor cells had a significantly better overall survival compared to negative cases ( p  =  0.008 ). This survival benefit was also maintained after stratification of CES2-positive cases, by comparing low, medium and high CES2 expression levels ( p-trend  =  0.0006 ). Evaluation of CCA subtypes showed the survival difference to be restricted to extrahepatic tumors. Correlation of CES2 expression with data of tumor-infiltrating immune cells showed that particularly CD8+ T cells were more frequently detected in CES2-positive CCAs. Furthermore, treatment of CCA cell lines with the prodrug Irinotecan reduced cell viability, increased cytotoxicity and modulated inflammatory gene expression. In conclusion, reduced CES2 expression is associated with poor outcome and low CD8+ T cell infiltration in CCA patients. Further clinical studies could show, whether CES2 expression may serve as a predictive marker in patients treated with prodrugs converted by CES2.