Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundPEGylated nanoparticles (PEG-NPs) are not effective for hematologic malignancies as they lack the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect). Tumor-targeted PEG-NPs can systemically track lymphoma and actively internalize into cancer cells to enhance therapeutic efficacy. We generated an anti-PEG bispecific antibody (BsAb; mPEG × CD20) which was able to simultaneously bind to methoxy PEG on liposomes and CD20 to form multivalent αCD20-armed liposomes. This αCD20-armed liposome was able to crosslink CD20 on lymphoma cells to enhance cellular internalization and the anti-cancer efficacy of the liposomes to lymphoma. We generated mPEG × CD20 and used this bispecific antibody to modify PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) through a one-step formulation.ResultsαCD20-armed PLD (αCD20/PLD) specifically targeted CD20+ Raji cells and enhanced PLD internalization 56-fold after 24 h. αCD20/PLD also increased cytotoxicity to Raji cells by 15.2-fold in comparison with PLD and control mPEG × DNS-modified PLD (αDNS/PLD). mPEG × CD20 significantly enhanced the tumor accumulation 2.8-fold in comparison with mPEG × DNS-conjugated PEGylated liposomal DiD in Raji tumors. Moreover, αCD20/PLD had significantly greater therapeutic efficacy as compared to αDNS/PLD (P < 0.0001) and PLD(P < 0.0001), and αCD20/PLD-treated mice had a 90% survival rate at 100-day post-treatment.ConclusionsModification of mPEG × CD20 can confer PLD with CD20 specificity to enhance the internalization and the anti-cancer efficacy of PEG-NPs. This therapeutic strategy can conveniently be used to modify various PEG-NPs with anti-PEG BsAb to overcome the lack of EPR effect of hematologic malignancies and improve therapeutic efficacy.

Background Targeting CD3 × CD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) represents a new milestone in the salvage therapy of relapsed/relapsed large B cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. However, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) remains one of the major concerns in clinical practice of CD3 × CD20 BsAbs. This study aimed to identify the potential predictive factors and to construct a nomogram of grade ≥ 2 CRS in CD3 × CD20 BsAbs in Chinese patients. Methods A total of 87 consecutive patients with B-NHL who received CD3 × CD20 BsAbs at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2021 to December 2023 were included and analyzed. Clinical data were collected, and various methods including machine learning algorithms were introduced. Results The median age of the patients was 55 years, and the median number of previous treatment lines was 2. CRS occurred in 42 patients (48.3%), including 27 cases of grade 1, 9 cases of grade 2, 5 cases of grade 3, and 1 case of grade 5. Four variables were revealed and selected: bulky disease (> 5 cm), number of previous treatment lines (≥ 3), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet count (PLT). Bootstrap resampling was introduced for both internal validation and model building. A predictive nomogram was ultimately established, with the ROC–AUC of 0.867 (95% CI 0.719–0.954). Conclusion This study suggests four potential predictive factors and provides a feasible and easy-to-use nomogram for grade ≥ 2 CRS in Chinese patients for the first time, which is important for guiding personalized management and early intervention of CRS.

The claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) protein, an isoform of claudin18, a member of the tight junction protein family, is a highly selective biomarker with limited expression in normal tissues and often abnormal expression during the occurrence and development of various primary malignant tumors, such as gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, liver cancer, head and neck cancer, bronchial cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. CLDN18.2 participates in the proliferation, differentiation and migration of tumor cells. Recent studies have identified CLDN18.2 expression as a potential specific marker for the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors. With its specific expression pattern, CLDN18.2 has become a unique molecule for targeted therapy in different cancers, especially in GC; for example, agents such as zolbetuximab (claudiximab, IMAB362), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against CLDN18.2, have been developed. In this review, we outline recent advances in the development of immunotherapy strategies targeting CLDN18.2, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells redirected to target CLDN18.2, and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs).

T cell-dependent bispecific antibodies (TDBs) are next-generation antibody therapies that link cancer cells and T cells to achieve potent antitumor effects. Despite the successful development of TDBs for hematological malignancies, their efficacy against solid tumors remains limited. Overcoming this challenge requires a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action. While the basic process of immunological synapse (IS) formation and T cell activation by TDB is known, the detailed effects of IS on the bystander effect and T cell migration, both crucial for therapeutic efficacy, remain unclear. This study investigated these mechanisms using an EGFR/CD3 TDB (hEx3) and EGFR knockout cancer cells (KO). The results revealed that IS formation by TDB induced a bystander effect, leading to damage in surrounding KO, with the extent depending on the proportion of EGFR-positive wild-type cancer cells (WT) and the duration of co-culture. Furthermore, IS formation significantly enhanced T cell cytokine and chemokine secretion, promoting T cell migration. These findings provide critical insights into TDB efficacy mechanisms and highlight the importance of evaluating IS formation in developing new antibody drugs. Establishing a reliable system for assessing IS formation will be essential for advancing TDBs and other antibody-based therapies, particularly against solid tumors.

Bispecific antibodies (bsAb) that target two independent epitopes or antigens have been extensively explored in translational and clinical studies since they were first developed in the 1960s. Many bsAbs are being tested in clinical trials for treating a variety of diseases, mostly cancer. Here, we provide an overview of various types of bsAbs in clinical studies and discuss their targets, safety profiles, and efficacy. We also highlight the current challenges, potential solutions, and future directions of bsAb development for cancer treatment. Graphical Abstract In this review, N. Li, Y. Nie & colleagues provide an overview of the current clinical development and future directions of bi‐specific antibodies for cancer treatment.

SummaryCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) contain 12 family members(CEACAM1、CEACAM3、CEACAM4、CEACAM5、CEACAM6、CEACAM7、CEACAM8、CEACAM16、CEACAM18、CEACAM19、CEACAM20 and CEACAM21)and are expressed diversely in different normal and tumor tissues. CEA (CEACAM5) has been used as a tumor biomarker since 1965. Here we review the latest research and development of the structures, expression, and function of CEACAMs in normal and tumor tissues, and their application in the tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We focus on recent clinical studies of CEA targeted cancer immunotherapies, including bispecific antibody (BsAb) for radio-immuno-therapy and imaging, bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T). We summarize the promising clinical relevance and challenges of these approaches and give perspective view for future research. This review has important implications in understanding the diversified biology of CEACAMs in normal and tumor tissues, and their new role in tumor immunotherapy.

A little over twenty-five years ago, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the chimeric antibody rituximab which fundamentally altered the landscape of anti-cancer drugs. While only a few antibodies were approved in the immediate years that followed the rituximab approval, the last decade saw a wave of antibody-drug approvals in the oncology arena. In the last three years, the EMA and FDA greenlighted eighteen antibodies, the majority of them designed in the formats of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb). While the use of ADC and BsAb formats and the current rapid pace of approvals appear routine and almost inevitable, such progress was thought to be quite improbable in the early days of therapeutic antibody development. To understand how we arrived at the current state of antibody development in oncology, we focus on six monumental events that shaped antibody approvals over the last two and half decades. We examine the circumstances that led to the approval of rituximab and trastuzumab, the first successful antibodies for the treatment of hematologic and solid cancers. We detail the generation of the ADC and BsAb formats that dramatically augmented antibody-mediated precision cytotoxicity. Finally, we explore the development of ipilimumab, the first immune checkpoint-inhibiting antibody that activates the immune system to kill cancer cells, and the discovery that allowed the use of checkpoint inhibitors across all cancer types based on the presence of genetic markers. Revisiting these key events provides critical insights into the process of antibody development in oncology.

Both EGFR and VEGFR2 frequently overexpress in TNBC and cooperate with each other in autocrine and paracrine manner to enhance tumor growth and angiogenesis. Therapeutic mAbs targeting EGFR (cetuximab) and VEGFR2 (ramucirumab) are approved by FDA for numerous cancer indications, but none of them are approved to treat breast cancers. TNBC cells secrete VEGF-A, which mediates angiogenesis on endothelial cells in a paracrine fashion, as well as promotes cancer cell growth in autocrine manner. To disrupt autocrine/paracrine loop in TNBC models in addition to mediating anti-EGFR tumor growth signaling and anti-VEGFR2 angiogenic pathway, we generated a BsAb co-targeting EGFR and VEGFR2 (designated as anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb), using publicly available sequences in which cetuximab IgG backbone is connected to the single chain variable fragment (scFv) of ramucirumab via a glycine linker. Physiochemical characterization data shows that anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb binds to both EGFR and VEGFR2 in a similar binding affinity comparable to parental antibodies. Anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb demonstrates in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity in TNBC models. Mechanistically, anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb not only directly inhibits both EGFR and VEGFR2 in TNBC cells but also disrupts autocrine mechanism in TNBC xenograft mouse model. Furthermore, anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb inhibits ligand-induced activation of VEGFR2 and blocks paracrine pathway mediated by VEGF secreted from TNBC cells in endothelial cells. Collectively, our novel findings demonstrate that anti-EGFR/VEGFR2 BsAb inhibits tumor growth via multiple mechanisms of action and warrants further investigation as a targeted antibody therapeutic for the treatment of TNBC.

T cell-dependent bispecific antibody (TDB)-induced T cell activation, which can eliminate tumor cells independent of MHC engagement, is expected to be a novel breakthrough immunotherapy against refractory cancer. However, the mechanism of action of TDBs has not been fully elucidated thus far. We focused on TDB-induced T cell–tumor cell contact as an important initial step in direct T cell-mediated tumor cell killing via transport of cytotoxic cell proteases (e.g., granzymes) with or without immunological synapse formation. Using an anti-EGFR/CD3 TDB, hEx3, we visualized and quantified T cell–tumor cell contact and demonstrated a correlation between the degree of cell contact and TDB efficacy. We also found that cytokines, including interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) secreted by activated T cells, damaged tumor cells in a cell contact-independent manner. Moreover, therapeutic experiences clearly indicated that hEx3, unlike conventional anti-EGFR antibodies, was effective against colorectal cancer (CRC) cells with mutant KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA. In a pharmacokinetic analysis, T cells spread gradually in accordance with the hEx3 distribution within tumor tissue. Accordingly, we propose that TDBs should have four action steps: 1st, passive targeting via size-dependent tumor accumulation; 2nd, active targeting via specific binding to tumor cells; 3rd, T cell redirection toward tumor cells; and 4th, TDB-induced cell contact-dependent (direct) or -independent (indirect) tumor cell killing. Finally, our TDB hEx3 may be a promising reagent against refractory CRC with an oncogenic mutation associated with a poor prognosis.

While monospecific antibodies have long been the foundational offering of protein therapeutics, recent advancements in antibody engineering have allowed for the development of far more complex antibody structures. Novel molecular format (NMF) proteins, such as bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), are structures capable of multispecific binding, allowing for expanded therapeutic functionality. As demand for NMF proteins continues to rise, biomanufacturers face the challenge of increasing bioreactor process productivity while simultaneously maintaining consistent product quality. This challenge is exacerbated when producing structurally complex proteins with asymmetric modalities, as seen in NMFs. In this study, the impact of a high inoculation density (HID) fed-batch process on the productivity and product quality attributes of two CHO cell lines expressing unique NMFs, a monospecific antibody with an Fc-fusion protein and a bispecific antibody, compared to low inoculation density (LID) platform fed-batch processes was evaluated. It was observed that an intensified platform fed-batch process increased product concentrations by 33 and 109% for the two uniquely structured complex proteins in a shorter culture duration while maintaining similar product quality attributes to traditional fed-batch processes.