Explore the vast range of titles available.

In 2011 over 1.7 million people were hospitalized because of a fragility fracture, and direct costs associated with osteoporosis treatment exceeded 70 billion dollars in the United States. Failure to reach and maintain optimal peak bone mass during adulthood is a critical factor in determining fragility fracture risk later in life. Physical activity is a widely accessible, low cost, and highly modifiable contributor to bone health. Exercise is especially effective during adolescence, a time period when nearly 50% of peak adult bone mass is gained. Here, we review the evidence linking exercise and physical activity to bone health in women. Bone structure and quality will be discussed, especially in the context of clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis. We review the mechanisms governing bone metabolism in the context of physical activity and exercise. Questions such as, when during life is exercise most effective, and what specific types of exercises improve bone health, are addressed. Finally, we discuss some emerging areas of research on this topic, and summarize areas of need and opportunity.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) induces severe losses of trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), which cannot be discriminated with conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis. The objectives were to: (i) determine the effects of SCI on areal BMD (aBMD) and vBMD determined by advanced 3D-DXA-based methods at various femoral regions and (ii) model the profiles of 3D-DXA-derived parameters with the time since injury. Eighty adult males with SCI and 25 age-matched able-bodied (AB) controls were enrolled in this study. Trabecular and cortical vBMD, cortical thickness and derived strength parameters were assessed by 3D-SHAPER® software at various femoral subregions. Individuals with SCI had significantly lower integral vBMD, trabecular vBMD, cortical vBMD, cortical thickness and derived bone strength parameters (p < 0.001 for all) in total proximal femur compared with AB controls. These alterations were approximately to the same degree for all three femoral subregions, and the difference between the two groups tended to be greater for cortical vBMD than trabecular vBMD. There were minor differences according to the lesion level (paraplegics vs tetraplegics) for all 3D-DXA-derived parameters. For total proximal femur, the decreasing bone parameters tended to reach a new steady state after 5.1 years for integral vBMD, 7.4 years for trabecular vBMD and 9.2 years for cortical vBMD following SCI. At proximal femur, lower vBMD (integral, cortical and trabecular) and cortical thickness resulted in low estimated bone strength in individuals with SCI. It remains to be demonstrated whether these new parameters are more closely associated with fragility fracture than aBMD.

SummaryAreal BMD (aBMD) from DXA is not a sufficiently accurate predictor of fracture. Novel volumetric BMD derived from 3D modeling of the hip from DXA images significantly improved the predictive ability for hip fracture relative to aBMD at the femoral neck, but not aBMD at the total hip.IntroductionTo clarify whether volumetric and geometric indices derived from novel three-dimensional (3D) modeling of the hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric (DXA) images improve hip fracture prediction relative to areal bone mineral density (aBMD).MethodsWe examined 1331 women who had completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey over 20 years (age 40–79 years at baseline). Each survey included aBMD measurement at the hip by DXA. Volumetric and geometric indices of the hip at baseline and the 10-year follow-up were estimated from DXA images using a 3D modeling algorithm. Incident hip fractures during the 20-year follow-up period were identified through self-report. Cox proportional hazards regression models allowing for repeated measurements of predictors and outcomes were constructed, and their predictive ability for hip fracture was evaluated using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) over aBMD at the femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) as references.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 19.8 years, 68 incident hip fractures were identified (2.22/1000 person-years). A significantly larger AUC of trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the total hip (AUC = 0.741), femoral neck (AUC = 0.748), and intertrochanter (AUC = 0.738) and significant NRI (0.177, 0.149, and 0.195, respectively) were observed compared with FN-aBMD (AUC = 0.701), but not TH-aBMD.ConclusionsvBMD obtained from 3D modeling using routinely obtained hip DXA images significantly improved hip fracture risk prediction over conventional FN-aBMD, but not TH-aBMD.Trial registrationThe Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study was retrospectively registered as UMIN000032869 in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry on July 1, 2018.

ABSTRACT The coexistence of osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an evolving healthcare challenge in the face of increasingly aging populations. Globally, accelerating fracture incidence causes disability, impaired quality of life and increased mortality. Consequently, several novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been introduced for treatment and prevention of fragility fractures. Despite an especially high fracture risk in CKD, these patients are commonly excluded from interventional trials and clinical guidelines. While management of fracture risk in CKD has been discussed in recent opinion-based reviews and consensus papers in the nephrology literature, many patients with CKD stages 3–5D and osteoporosis are still underdiagnosed and untreated. The current review addresses this potential treatment nihilism by discussing established and novel approaches to diagnosis and prevention of fracture risk in patients with CKD stages 3–5D. Skeletal disorders are common in CKD. A wide variety of underlying pathophysiological processes have been identified, including premature aging, chronic wasting, and disturbances in vitamin D and mineral metabolism, which may impact bone fragility beyond established osteoporosis. We discuss current and emerging concepts of CKD–mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD) and integrate management of osteoporosis in CKD with current recommendations for management of CKD-MBD. While many diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to osteoporosis can be applied to patients with CKD, some limitations and caveats need to be considered. Consequently, clinical trials are needed that specifically study fracture prevention strategies in patients with CKD stages 3–5D. Lay Summary Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of fractures, causing disability, impaired quality of life and increased risk of death. Osteoporosis is a common cause of fractures, and different medications have the potential to reduce fracture risk in osteoporosis. Several diagnostic criteria have been developed to identify patients at risk of fracture who would benefit from treatment. However, in CKD, the identification of patients with increased fracture risk is complicated by mineral metabolism disturbances due to reduced kidney function. Furthermore, patients with more advanced CKD are often excluded from clinical trials and treatment recommendations for fracture risk reduction. This review discusses diagnostic possibilities and treatment options to reduce fracture risk in patients with CKD, based on disease mechanisms, clinical experience, and clinical and experimental research. Although more research is needed, we conclude that many diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to osteoporosis can be applied in patients with CKD.

Background Osteoporosis affects mostly postmenopausal women, leading to deterioration of the microarchitectural bone structure and low bone mass, with an increased fracture risk with associated disability, morbidity and mortality. This Bayesian network meta-analysis compared the effects of current anti-osteoporosis drugs on bone mineral density. Methods The present systematic review and network meta-analysis follows the PRISMA extension statement to report systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. The literature search was performed in June 2021. All randomised clinical trials that have investigated the effects of two or more drug treatments on BMD for postmenopausal osteoporosis were accessed. The network comparisons were performed through the STATA Software/MP routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. The inverse variance method with standardised mean difference (SMD) was used for analysis. Results Data from 64 RCTs involving 82,732 patients were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 29.7 ± 19.6 months. Denosumab resulted in a higher spine BMD (SMD −0.220; SE 3.379), followed by pamidronate (SMD −5.662; SE 2.635) and zoledronate (SMD −10.701; SE 2.871). Denosumab resulted in a higher hip BMD (SMD −0.256; SE 3.184), followed by alendronate (SMD −17.032; SE 3.191) and ibandronate (SMD −17.250; SE 2.264). Denosumab resulted in a higher femur BMD (SMD 0.097; SE 2.091), followed by alendronate (SMD −16.030; SE 1.702) and ibandronate (SMD −17.000; SE 1.679). Conclusion Denosumab results in higher spine BMD in selected women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Denosumab had the highest influence on hip and femur BMD. Level of evidence Level I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppressive therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients after postoperative 1–2 years in Northeast China. Methods Five male, sixteen premenopausal, and eight postmenopausal female DTC patients receiving TSH suppressive therapy after thyroidectomy were enrolled. Patients were matched with healthy controls in a ratio of 1:2. All participants completed postoperative 1-year follow-up, and postmenopausal women completed 2-year follow-up. We measured BMD of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone formation marker P1NP and bone resorption marker β -CTX were also evaluated. Fracture risks were assessed by FRAX. Results There was no difference in BMD and BTMs between DTC patients and controls in the male group at 1-year follow-up. In the premenopausal women, the baseline P1NP was significantly lower in DTC patients than in the controls. The LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD in DTC patients were all higher than those in controls at 1-year follow-up. The difference in FN-BMD was not significant after adjusting for baseline P1NP. In the postmenopausal women, no differences in BMD and BTMs were observed between DTC patients and controls at the 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Conclusion Our study indicated that postoperative 1-year TSH suppressive therapy did not show detrimental effects on BMD and BTMs in men, premenopausal, and postmenopausal DTC patients. The 2-year postoperative TSH suppressive therapy did not lead to additional loss of bone mass in postmenopausal DTC patients.

SummaryFemur expansion occurs during normal aging in both men and women. Average bone mineral density (BMD) over a region of interest (ROI) on the femur may considerably decrease with age even in healthy people, and therefore, it is inaccurate if used to monitor treatment-induced bone change.IntroductionAreal bone mineral density (BMD), averaged over a region of interest (ROI) on the femur, is widely used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, assessment of fracture risk, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness. We studied the effect of age-related change in femur geometry on average BMD.MethodsThe effect of age-related bone geometric change on averaged BMD was investigated by a cross-sectional study. Total 83 healthy subjects were selected for this study. For each subject, QCT of left femur was scanned using clinical scanner. For each standard volume of interest (VOI), integral/cortical/trabecular bone volume, volumetric BMD (vBMD), and bone mass were measured using QCT Pro; the corresponding areal BMD (aBMD) was projected using CTXA-Hip. Both QCT Pro and CTXA-Hip are commercial software. Correlations between bone volume/density/mass and age were studied.ResultsIn the studied population, there was no association between body weight/BMI (body mass index) and age, correlation between normalized femoral neck width and age was 0.24 (p < 0.05). Both aBMD and integral vBMD decreased with age (after adjusted by BMI, for aBMD, r = − 0.21 to − 0.24, p ≤ 0.05 except at trochanter; for vBMD, r = − 0.20 to − 0.31, p < 0.05); cortical vBMD had no significant change; trabecular vBMD decreased at all VOIs except at trochanter (after adjusted by BMI, r = − 0.22 to 0.32, p ≤ 0.05). Integral volume showed slight increase but only significant at the trochanter after adjusted by body size, cortical volume showed insignificant decrease, and trabecular volume considerably increased with age in all VOIs (after adjusted by body size, r = 0.27–0.40, p < 0.05). Integral, cortical, and trabecular mass had no significant change in all VOIs, except that at the trochanter trabecular mass slightly increased with age (r = 0.31, p < 0.05).ConclusionsEven though there is no change in bone mass, average BMD may considerably decrease with age due to bone expansion. Comparatively, aBMD is less affected than vBMD.

Purpose To understand the pathophysiology of idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) better, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of bone mineral density (BMD), hormones, and bone turnover markers (BTMs) between IOP patients and healthy controls. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, an appropriate search query was created, and three databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were searched for screening relevant original articles. Feasible information, both qualitative and quantitative, was extracted and used to conduct meta-analyses. Publication bias and heterogeneity among studies were evaluated using appropriate statistical tools. Results A total of 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was reduced BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) (pooled: SDM: −2.38, p -value: 0.0001), femoral neck (FN) (pooled: SDM: −1.75 p -value: 0.0001), total hip (TH) (pooled: SDM: −1.825, p -value: 0.0001) and distal radius (DR) (pooled: SDM of −0.476, p -value: 0.0001), of which LS was the most affected site. There was no significant change in BTMs compared with healthy controls. Total estradiol (SDM: −1.357, p -value: 0.003) was reduced, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) (SDM: 1.51, p -value: 0.03) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (SDM: 1.454, p -value: 0.0001) were elevated in IOP patients compared with healthy controls. Conclusion Our meta-analysis, the first of its kind on IOP, defines it as showing BMD decline maximally at LS compared with healthy controls without any alterations in the BTMs. Further studies are required to understand gender differences and the significance of altered hormonal profiles in this condition.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes bone loss, only partly related to inflammation. The impact of RA treatments on bone metabolism and their ability to mitigate bone loss remains uncertain. The primary goal of our study was to examine the influence of abatacept on serum levels of markers and regulators involved in bone turnover. Secondary objectives included evaluating changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone health parameters, erosions, and exploring potential correlations among these parameters. We conducted a prospective observational study on patients with active seropositive RA failure to biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs initiating treatment with abatacept. We measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months: serum bone turnover markers (CTX, P1nP, B-ALP), bone modulators (Dkk-1, sclerostin, vitamin D, PTH, OPG and RANKL), BMD and radiographic parameters (modified Sharp van der Heijde score [mSvdH], bone health index [BHI] and metacarpal index [MCI]). Disease activity and glucocorticoid intake was monitored. 33 patients were enrolled in the study. We found a significant increase in markers of bone formation (B-ALP and P1nP) from baseline to M6 and M12. PTH increased significantly at M6 but not at M12. All other bone markers and modulators did not change. We found a significant decrease in BHI and MCI from baseline to M12 (median difference − 0.17 95% CI − 0.42 to − 0.10, p 0.001 and − 0.09 95% CI − 0.23 to − 0.07, respectively). BMD at femoral neck transitorily decreased at M6 (mean difference − 0.019 g/cm 2 95% CI − 0.036 to − 0.001 p 0.04). BMD at total hip, lumbar spine and mSvdH score did not change significantly. P1nP delta at M12 correlated with delta mSvdH. Treatment with abatacept was associated with a significant increase in bone formation markers. The secondary and transient increase in PTH serum levels may be responsible of the transitory bone loss.

Objectives: This retrospective study included 21 patients with primary osteoporosis who were treated with the anti-resorption drug, denosumab. To date, there has been no detailed report on the changes of bone-related minerals after anti-resorption drug therapy. Methods: Twenty-one post-menopausal females were retrospectively enrolled. Serum zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), grip strength, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were examined at one week and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months. Lumbar spine (L1-4) bone mineral density (L-BMD) and bilateral total hip BMD (H-BMD) were examined before and at 4, 8, and 12 months after treatment commencement. Results: Serum Zn tended to decrease at one week and one month, and tended to increase during 10 to 12 months. Serum Cu maintained during zero to eight months, then decreased at 10 and 12 months. Serum Fe gradually increased after four months. Serum Mg sharply increased at one week, then decreased further. Grip strength increased for two months, then slightly decreased and maintained 4 to 12 months. eGFR almost maintained for zero to eight months, then slightly decreased thereafter. L-BMD values significantly increased at eight (5.8%) (p < 0.01) and 12 months (9.8%) (p < 0.01). H-BMD increased during the period (at 12 months: 3.7%). Conclusions: These results suggest that at later phases of denosumab therapy, Zn and Fe tended to increase while Mg tended to decrease, all of which are important for bone metabolism. Thus, denosumab might improve Zn and Fe metabolism, and thereby likely increase BMD. Since denosumab may not improve Mg, it is better to obtain Mg supplementation during the therapy.