Explore the vast range of titles available.

Moral disengagement was initially conceptualized as a process through which people reconstrue unethical behaviors, with the effect of deactivating self-sanctions and thereby clearing the way for ethical transgressions. Our article challenges how researchers now conceptualize moral disengagement. The current literature is overly liberal, in that it mixes two related but distinct constructs—process moral disengagement and the propensity to morally disengage—creating ambiguity in the findings. It is overly conservative, as it adopts a challengeable classification scheme of \"four points in moral self-regulation\" and perpetuates defining moral disengagement via a set of eight psychological mechanisms, narrowing our understanding of the phenomenon. To address these problems, we propose to define process moral disengagement intensionally (specifying the necessary and sufficient conditions for correct application of the term) as intrapsychic cognitive reasoning processes through which people selectively reconstrue a moral judgment \"behavior by actor A is morally wrong\" and shift it toward becoming \"behavior is not morally wrong\" or \"actor A is not responsible for behavior B.\" This definition achieves disambiguation and increased concept clarity. We leverage the definition to motivate a classification scheme for psychological mechanisms of moral disengagement along two dimensions—reconstruing morality and reconstruing agency—and to initiate an open inventory of psychological mechanisms that specify how process moral disengagement operates.

Originally conceptualized by Bandura (Person Soc Psychol Rev 3:193-209, 1999) as the process of cognitive restructuring that allows individuals to disassociate with their internal moral standards and behave unethically without feeling distress, moral disengagement has attracted the attention of management researchers in recent years. An increasing body of research has examined the factors which lead people to morally disengage and its related outcomes in the workplace. However, the conceptualization of moral disengagement, how it should be measured, the manner in which it develops, and its influence on work outcomes are areas of continued debate among researchers. In this article, we undertake a systematic review of research on moral disengagement in the workplace and develop a comprehensive research agenda that highlights opportunities for theoretical and empirical advancement of the literature.

Digital transformation represents a compelling opportunity for manufacturing companies to enhance their competitiveness. This transformative journey offers myriad possibilities, including improved connectivity between workers and machines, as well as seamless machine-to-machine interactions. However, many manufacturing companies encounter challenges when attempting to implement digital transformation effectively. The process of digital transformation is often slow, and most companies find themselves in the early stages of adoption, grappling with the ambiguity surrounding the associated technologies. A systematic approach for the implementation of digital transformation is still elusive for many manufacturing companies. The number of studies exploring digital transformation is increasingly growing, encompassing various sectors and domains. However, within the manufacturing sector, there remains a need for further research and clarity on systematic implementation approaches. To address these issues, this research undertakes a comprehensive analysis to identify the critical factors that influence digital transformation in the manufacturing sector. The objective of this research is to identify the factors that drive the success of digital transformation in manufacturing companies while also uncovering factors that, when neglected, could lead to failure. Through a systematic literature review, this research identifies 11 critical factors. These factors serve as the basis for developing the ARTO model, a structured framework comprising four distinct categories: \"Awareness-related factors,\" \"Readiness-related factors,\" \"Technology Selection-related factors,\" and \"Operations-related factors.\" Moreover, this research incorporates expert perspectives gathered through a survey to refine the ARTO model. This study offers the ARTO model and digital transformation definition as practical tools for successfully implementing digital transformation in manufacturing companies, while also delineating the intricate relationships among the crucial factors. By shedding light on the factors underpinning digital transformation in the manufacturing sector, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse and facilitates more effective adoption of digital transformation strategies. Highlights Digital transformation enhances competitiveness with connectivity and machine interactions. Challenges in implementing digital transformation necessitate the identification of critical influencing factors. Developed ARTO (Awareness, Readiness, Technology, and Operations) model for enabling successful digital transformation based on critical factors. The ARTO model, derived from 11 critical factors, offers a structured framework for successful implementation. The ARTO model and the proposed DT definition guide manufacturing companies in their digital transformation journey. This research sheds light on essential factors, contributing to a more effective adoption of digital transformation strategies.

In this research, we examine the relationship between employee psychological entitlement (PE) and employee willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). We hypothesize that a high level of PE—the belief that one should receive desirable treatment irrespective of whether it is deserved—will increase the prevalence of this particular type of unethical behavior. We argue that, driven by self-interest and the desire to look good in the eyes of others, highly entitled employees may be more willing to engage in UPB when their personal goals are aligned with those of their organizations. Support for this proposition was found in Study 1, which demonstrates that organizational identification accentuates the link between PE and the willingness to engage in UPB. Study 2 builds on these findings by examining a number of mediating variables that shed light on why PE leads to a greater willingness among employees to engage in UPB. Furthermore, we explored the differential effects of PE on UPB compared to counterproductive work behavior (CWB). We found support for our moderated mediation model, which shows that status striving and moral disengagement fully mediate the link between PE and UPB. PE was also linked to CWB and was fully mediated by perceptions of organizational justice and moral disengagement.

Studies of demand-side populism with a focus on attitudinal and behavioral factors are becoming more popular, but only a few have explored the phenomenon's psychological determinants. We tackle the lack of conversation between populism scholars and political psychologists and test the impact of conspiracy beliefs, moral disengagement, need for cognition, and belief in simple solutions on populist attitudes. We use the most widespread ideational definition in an attempt to bring clarity to demand-side populism, as the literature often conflates the concept of populism with adjacent ideological and psychological factors. We analyze representative samples from two very different countries (Italy and Turkey) to test our hypotheses. We use two of the most oftenused measures of populist attitudes and also explore populism's individual building blocks: people-centrism, antielitism, and a Manichean worldview. We consistently find conspiracy beliefs (and our control variable of institutional trust) as primary sources of populist attitudes, whereas the impact of the other psychological factors is more dependent on context and operationalization. Our article calls for more conceptual clarity, careful theorization, and more work on the refinement of available survey measures. We also highlight the importance of national contexts and the dangers of generalization based on individual country studies.

Recent research has uncovered the dark side of creativity by finding that creative individuals are more likely to engage in unethical behavior. However, we argue that not all creative individuals make trouble. Using moral self-regulation theory as our overarching theoretical framework, we examine individuals' moral identity as a boundary condition and moral disengagement as a mediating mechanism to explain when and how individual creativity is associated with workplace deviant behavior. We conducted two field studies using multi-source data to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, the results indicated that creativity positively predicted moral disengagement for those low in moral identity. In Study 2 with multi-wave data, we replicated the finding that moral identity moderated the effect of creativity on moral disengagement in Study 1 and further revealed that moral disengagement mediated the interactive effects of creativity and moral identity on workplace deviant behavior. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.