Explore the vast range of titles available.

Primary angle-closure glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. In early-stage disease, intraocular pressure is raised without visual loss. Because the crystalline lens has a major mechanistic role, lens extraction might be a useful initial treatment. From Jan 8, 2009, to Dec 28, 2011, we enrolled patients from 30 hospital eye services in five countries. Randomisation was done by a web-based application. Patients were assigned to undergo clear-lens extraction or receive standard care with laser peripheral iridotomy and topical medical treatment. Eligible patients were aged 50 years or older, did not have cataracts, and had newly diagnosed primary angle closure with intraocular pressure 30 mm Hg or greater or primary angle-closure glaucoma. The co-primary endpoints were patient-reported health status, intraocular pressure, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-year gained 36 months after treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN44464607. Of 419 participants enrolled, 155 had primary angle closure and 263 primary angle-closure glaucoma. 208 were assigned to clear-lens extraction and 211 to standard care, of whom 351 (84%) had complete data on health status and 366 (87%) on intraocular pressure. The mean health status score (0·87 [SD 0·12]), assessed with the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire, was 0·052 higher (95% CI 0·015–0·088, p=0·005) and mean intraocular pressure (16·6 [SD 3·5] mm Hg) 1·18 mm Hg lower (95% CI –1·99 to –0·38, p=0·004) after clear-lens extraction than after standard care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £14 284 for initial lens extraction versus standard care. Irreversible loss of vision occurred in one participant who underwent clear-lens extraction and three who received standard care. No patients had serious adverse events. Clear-lens extraction showed greater efficacy and was more cost-effective than laser peripheral iridotomy, and should be considered as an option for first-line treatment. Medical Research Council.

Background/aimsTo assess baseline ocular parameters in the prediction of long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) control after clear lens extraction (CLE) or laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in patients with primary angle closure (PAC) disease using data from the Effectiveness of Early Lens Extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE) tria.MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of EAGLE data where we define the primary outcome of ‘good responders’ as those with IOP<21 mm Hg without requiring additional surgery and ‘optimal responders’ as those who in addition were medication free, at 36-month follow-up. Primary analysis was conducted using a multivariate logistic regression model to assess how randomised interventions and ocular parameters predict treatment response.ResultsA total of 369 patients (182 in CLE arm and 187 in LPI arm) completed the 36-month follow-up examination. After CLE, 90% met our predefined ‘good response’ criterion compared with 67% in the LPI arm, and 66% met ‘optimal response’ criterion compared with 18% in the LPI arm, with significantly longer drops/surgery-free survival time (p<0.05 for all). Patients randomised to CLE (OR=10.1 (6.1 to 16.8)), Chinese (OR=2.3 (1.3 to 3.9)), and those who had not previously used glaucoma drops (OR=2.8 (1.6 to 4.8)) were more likely to maintain long-term optimal IOP response over 36 months.ConclusionPatients with primary angle closure glaucoma/PAC are 10 times more likely to maintain drop-free good IOP control with initial CLE surgery than LPI. Non-Chinese ethnicity, higher baseline IOP and using glaucoma drops prior to randomisation are predictors of worse long-term IOP response.

PurposeTo describe the results of darkroom prone provocative testing (DRPPT) in primary angle closure suspects (PACS) and to compare the findings to controls with open angles.Methods889 subjects with PACS in the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial (a randomised controlled trial to compare prophylactic laser iridotomy to no treatment in PACS) and 89 with open angles in the 5-year follow-up of Liwan Eye Study were placed in a darkroom face down for 15 min. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately before and after DRPPT.ResultsPACS participants were of similar age than controls (59.3 vs 60.5), more often female (82.9% vs 58.4%) and had lower IOP (14.3 vs 15.2 mm Hg). The average IOP increases after DRPPT was 4.3±3 mm Hg in PACS and 5.2±2.8 in controls (p<0.05). 20.5% of controls and 13.9 % of those with PACS developed an IOP spike ≥8 mm Hg after DRPPT (p<0.05). Among PACS, 15.8 % of those with all four quadrants closed had an IOP elevation of ≥ 8 mm Hg as opposed to 10.0%–12.4 % with two or three closed quadrants (p<0.05). DRPPT failed to predict who would reach a clinical trial endpoint over 6-year follow-up of those with PACS.ConclusionsA modified DRPPT failed to separate PACS from those with open angle. Although the test resulted in greater IOP elevation among those PACS participants with all four quadrants closed than in those with two or three closed quadrants, it did not offer any insight into the risk of developing acute or chronic angle closure disease over 6-year follow-up.

Objective To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravenous mannitol on the capsulorhexis process and intraoperative complications in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). Methods In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 65 PACG eyes were randomized into the mannitol and control groups. The capsulorhexis duration, number of forceps grasps, need for viscoelastic re-injection, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Results The mannitol group had a significantly shorter capsulorhexis duration and fewer forceps grasps of the capsule. All intraoperative complications (18.2%) occurred in the control group. The patients with intraoperative complications had significantly higher intraocular pressure and lower best-corrected visual acuity than those without complications after surgery. Multivariate analysis found that intravenous mannitol (odds ratio [OR] = −14.263; 95% confidence interval [CI] =−26.713 to −1.813) reduced the capsulorhexis duration, whereas zonulopathy (OR = 14.477, 95% CI = 2.622–26.331) prolonged the duration. Conclusion Preoperative intravenous mannitol can reduce the risk of intraoperative complications and improve postoperative outcomes in patients with PACG. Factors including anterior chamber depth, incision location and method, and the zonule status significantly influence the capsulorhexis process.

AimsTo compare the change in iris–trabecular contact (ITC) area using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and cataract that underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with intraocular lens implantation alone compared with PE with goniosynechialysis (GSL).MethodsOne eye of 22 patients with PACG with peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) detected by indentation gonioscopy was randomised into two groups (PE alone (n=11) and PE+GSL (n=11)). The anterior chamber angles were evaluated by SS-OCT under dark conditions before and 12 months after surgery using the three-dimensional angle analysis scan protocol that simultaneously obtains 128 cross-sectional radial scans across the anterior chamber at equal intervals (every 1.4°). The ITC area, defined as the area of extent of the circumferential contact of peripheral iris to the angle wall, was computed automatically by SS-OCT after an observer marked the scleral spurs of all 128 scans of each eye.ResultsThe majority of the 22 subjects were women (77.3%) and the mean±SD age was 67.3±5.8 years. The ITC area was significantly reduced in the PE+GSL group compared with the PE alone group (10.2 mm2 vs 4.6 mm2, β=0.54, p=0.03) after adjusting for age, gender, intraocular pressure, extent of PAS and pupil diameter before surgery. Smaller iris volume at baseline was associated with greater ITC area reduction by PE+GSL (β=−0.728, p=0.03).ConclusionsEyes that undergo PE+GSL surgery have a greater reduction in circumferential ITC area than eyes that undergo PE alone.

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification with phacotrabeculectomy in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes with medically controlled intraocular pressure (IOP).MethodsProspective, randomized control trial including 33 eyes of 33 patients who underwent phacoemulsification (Phaco) and 37 eyes (37 patients) who underwent phacotrabeculectomy (PT). The primary outcome measure was survival defined as IOP control (IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 21 mmHg without antiglaucoma medications (AGM) at different time points. Secondary outcome measures were the rate of visual recovery and complications.ResultsThe mean age in years (PT: 58.5 ± 9.8, Phaco:61.6 ± 8.9; p = 0.16), preoperative mean deviation in decibel (PT: −18.7 ± 9.3; Phaco: −16.6 ± 7.9; p = 0.32) and the mean follow up in years (PT: 2.5 ± 1.8; Phaco: 2.8 ± 2.0; p = 0.63) were similar in the two groups. The mean preoperative AGMs were more in the PT group (PT: 2.13 ± 0.97, Phaco: 1.60 ± 0.78; p = 0.01). In both the groups the survival was similar at all-time points (PT: 78% at 1-year and 52% at 5-years, Phaco: 80% at 1 year and 59% at 5 years (P = 0.82). The postoperative visual acuity in LogMAR was significantly better in the Phaco group at 1 month (PT: 0.22 ± 0.38, Phaco:0.06 ± 0.07; p = 0.02). Postoperative AGM (p = 0.68) and rate of visual field progression PT: −0.46 ± 0.41 dB/year; Phaco: −0.38 ± 0.73 dB/year; p = 0.67) were similar in both groups. One eye in PT group developed malignant glaucoma which resolved with laser hyaloidotomy and cycloplegic therapy.ConclusionsMore rapid visual recovery with similar IOP control and similar visual field stability favor phacoemulsification to phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled PACG eyes with cataract.

Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of combined laser iridoplasty followed by surgical iridectomy (LI-SI) versus trabeculectomy in the management of medically unresponsive acute primary angle closure (APAC) with minimal cataract. Patients and methods This was a randomized controlled trial conducted among patients with medically unresponsive APAC without significant cataract. Study participants were randomized into: LI-SI or unaugmented trabeculectomy. Primary outcome of the study was the rate of post-operative surgical complications in the first 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcome assessed at 1 year was whether treatment was completely successful (IOP < 21 mmHg without IOP lowering drops), or partially successful (IOP < 21 mmHg with IOP lowering drops). Failure was defined as IOP ≥ 21 mmHg with IOP lowering drops. Results The study included 67 eyes of 67 patients (59 females/8 males = 7.4/1) who were randomized into 2 groups: LI-SI (Group 1, 37 eyes), and trabeculectomy (Group 2, 30 eyes). There was no statistical difference between the two groups at baseline. Overall, there were more post-operative complications in Group 1 versus Group 2 (45.9% versus 33.3% - p  = 0.23), although all responded well to medical treatment and resolved without sequelae. Complete success was found in 97.1% (34/35 eyes) in Group 1 and 92.6% in group 2 ( p  = 0.19, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusions There was a higher rate of post-operative complications after LI-SI compared to trabeculectomy performed for medically unresponsive APAC with minimal cataract. Both procedures had similar surgical outcomes at 1 year.

BackgroundTo describe the surgical technique and refractive outcomes following clear lens extraction (CLE) in the Effectiveness, in Angle-closure Glaucoma, of Lens Extraction trial.MethodsReview of prospectively collected data from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing CLE and laser peripheral iridotomy. Eligible participants were ≥50 years old and newly diagnosed with (1) primary angle closure (PAC) with intraocular pressure above 30 mm Hg or (2) PAC glaucoma. We report the postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and refractive outcomes at 12 and 36 months postoperatively for those who underwent CLE.ResultsOf the 419 participants, 208 were randomised to CLE. Mean baseline CDVA was 77.9 (SD 12.4) letters and did not change significantly at 36 months when mean CDVA was 79.9 (SD 10.9) letters. Mean preoperative spherical equivalents were +1.7 (SD 2.3) and +0.08 (SD 0.95) diopters (D) at 36 months. Fifty-nine per cent and 85% eyes were within ±0.5D and ±1.0D of predicted refraction, respectively, at 36 months.ConclusionsMean CDVA in patients undergoing CLE for angle-closure glaucoma appeared stable over the 3-year study period. Refractive error was significantly reduced with surgery but refractive predictability was suboptimal.Trial registration number

Objective To evaluate safety and efficacy of 0.1 mg/ml versus 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin-C (MMC), applied for 1 min subconjunctivally, during trabeculectomy for primary adult glaucoma in previously un-operated eyes. Materials and methods This is a randomised controlled, non-inferior, clinical trial consisting of 50 consecutive POAG or CPACG patients uncontrolled on maximal hypotensive therapy, meeting all inclusion criteria. Patients were randomized into two groups and underwent a standard limbus-based trabeculectomy with MMC: Group I, 0.1 mg/ml and Group II, 0.2 mg/ml. The pre-operative and post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP), bleb morphology, and visual acuity were recorded every 6 months for 2 years. Complete success (primary outcome) was defined as IOP ≤ 15 mmHg without any additional medications at the end of 2 years. Results The average age of patients was 62.6 ± 9.8 years and 61.2 ± 8.1 years in Group 1 and 2, respectively; p  = 0.57. The mean preoperative IOP was 22.5 ± 1.4 mmHg and 23.3 ± 1.8 mmHg; p  = 0.10. The mean IOP at 2 years was 11.1 ± 1.6 mmHg and 10.8 ± 2.8 mmHg, a mean reduction in IOP of 50.6 ± 1.23 %, and 53.7 ± 2.25 % in Group I and II, respectively. The complete success was 92.0 % and 91.7 % in the two groups, respectively ( p  = 0.99), and there was one failure (Group II, post trauma). A wider bleb extent and larger areas of thin, transparent conjunctiva over the bleb were seen with the 0.2 mg/ml MMC group ( p  < 0.001) and in PACG eyes; p  < 0.04. Conclusion A 1-min subconjunctival application of low dose 0.1 mg/ml MMC is non-inferior to 0.2 mg/ml and is probably a safer alternative, as thinning of the bleb is significantly less frequent in the long term.