Explore the vast range of titles available.

Pathogenic avian influenza A virus H5N1 has caused outbreaks in poultry and migratory birds in Asia, Africa, and Europe, and caused disease and death in people. Although person-to-person spread of current H5N1 strains is unlikely, the virus is a potential source of a future influenza pandemic. Our aim was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine against the H5N1 strain. We did a randomised, open-label, non-controlled phase I trial in 300 volunteers aged 18–40 years and assigned one of six inactivated split influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) influenza vaccine formulations, comprising 7·5 μg (with adjuvant n=50, without adjuvant n=49), 15 μg (n=50, n=50), or 30 μg (n=51, n=50) of haemagglutinin with or without aluminium hydroxide adjuvant. Individuals received two vaccinations (on days 0 and 21) and provided blood samples (on days 0, 21, and 42) for analysis by haemagglutination inhibition and microneutralisation. We recorded all adverse events. Analyses were descriptive. All formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events, few severe reactions, and no oral temperatures of more than 38°C. All formulations induced an immune response, and responses were detectable in some individuals after only one dose. The adjuvanted 30 μg formulation induced the greatest response (67% haemagglutinin-inhibition seroconversion rate after two vaccinations). Adjuvant did not improve the response to the lower doses. Two vaccinations of non-adjuvanted 7·5 μg, adjuvanted 15 μg, or non-adjuvanted 15 μg seroconverted more than 40% of participants (haemagglutinin-inhibition test only). Haemagglutinin inhibition and neutralising results were comparable. A two-dose regimen with an adjuvanted 30 μg inactivated H5N1 vaccine was safe and showed an immune response consistent with European regulatory requirements for licensure of seasonal influenza vaccine. We noted encouraging responses with lower doses of antigen that need further study to ascertain their relevance for the choice of the final pandemic vaccine.

•Titers of neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus determined using different assay readouts correlate well.•Agreement of nominal titers varies with MN readouts compared and virus strain used.•HAI and MN titers correlate well but nominal titers show poor agreement.•MN assay with ELISA as readout has the highest potential for standardization. Determination of influenza-specific antibody titers is commonly done using the hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) and the viral microneutralization assay (MN). Both assays are characterized by high intra- and inter-laboratory variability. The HAI assay offers little opportunity for standardization. For the MN assay, variability might be due to the use of different assay protocols employing different readouts. We therefore aimed at investigating which of the MN assay readout methods currently in use would be the most suitable choice for a standardized MN assay that could serve as a substitute for the HAI assay. For this purpose, human serum samples were tested for the presence of influenza specific neutralizing antibodies against A/California/7/09 H1N1 (49 sera) or A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (50 sera) using four different infection readout methods for the MN assay (cytopathic effect, hemagglutination, ELISA, RT qPCR) and using the HAI assay. The results were compared by correlation analysis and by determining the level of agreement before and after normalization to a standard serum. Titers as measured by the 4 MN assay readouts showed good correlation, with high Person’s r for most comparisons. However, agreement between nominal titers varied with readouts compared and virus strain used. In addition, Pearson’s correlation of MN titers with HAI titers was high but agreement of nominal titers was moderate and the average difference between the readings of two assays (bias) was virus strain-dependent. Normalization to a standard serum did not result in better agreement of assay results. Our study demonstrates that different MN readouts result in nominally different antibody titers. Accordingly, the use of a common and standardized MN assay protocol will be crucial to minimize inter-laboratory variability. Based on reproducibility, cost effectiveness and unbiased assessment of results we elected the MN assay with ELISA readout as most suitable for a possible replacement of the HAI assay.

•High-dose trivalent influenza vaccine is licensed for adults ≥65 years of age.•A quadrivalent formulation with antigen from both B lineages has been developed.•Adding the second B strain improved immunogenicity against the added strain.•Immunogenicity against the other strains remained the same.•The vaccine’s tolerability was unaffected by adding the second B strain. A high-dose, split-virion inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD; Fluzone® High-Dose, Sanofi Pasteur) is available for adults ≥65 years of age. This study examined the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent high-dose split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD). This was a randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center trial in healthy adults ≥65 years of age. Subjects were randomized in a 4:1:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular injection of IIV4-HD, the licensed IIV3-HD, or an IIV3-HD containing the alternate B-lineage strain. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), seroneutralisation, and anti-neuraminidase antibody titers were measured at baseline and day 28. Solicited reactions were collected for up to 7 days, unsolicited adverse events up to 28 days, and serious adverse events up to 180 days. The primary immunogenicity objective was to demonstrate that IIV4-HD induces HAI geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroconversion rates that are non-inferior to those induced by IIV3-HD. Secondary objectives were to describe the safety of IIV4-HD and IIV3-HD and to demonstrate that IIV4-HD induces HAI GMTs and seroconversion rates that are superior to those induced by IIV3-HD not containing the same B-lineage strain. The study included 2670 adults ≥65 years of age. For all four strains, HAI GMTs and seroconversion rates induced by IIV4-HD were non-inferior to those induced by IIV3-HDs containing the same strains. For both B strains, HAI GMTs and seroconversion rates induced by IIV4-HD were superior to those induced by IIV3-HD not containing the same B–lineage strain. Seroneutralisation and anti-neuraminidase antibody responses, measured in a subset of subjects, were similar. No new safety concerns were identified, and the safety profiles of IIV4-HD and IIV3-HD were similar. Adding a second B strain in IIV4-HD resulted in improved immunogenicity against the added strain without compromising the immunogenicity of the other strains or the vaccine’s tolerability. Clinical trial registration: NCT03282240.

•Influenza infection was less frequent in children after QIV versus control vaccine.•Efficacy against any circulating and antigenically matching strains was 54% and 68%.•QIV induced antibodies against HA and NA as well as virus neutralizing antibodies.•Revaccination with QIV elicited strong antibody responses for all strains.•The safety and reactogenicity of QIV was comparable with control vaccine. Children are an important target group for influenza vaccination, but few studies have prospectively evaluated influenza vaccine efficacy (VE) in children under 3 years of age. This was a randomized Phase III trial to assess the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) in young children (EudraCT: 2016–004904–74). Influenza-naïve children aged 6–35 months were randomized during three influenza seasons to receive vaccination with QIV or a non-influenza control vaccine. One group of participants was revaccinated with QIV in the subsequent influenza season. The primary efficacy endpoint was the absolute VE of QIV against influenza caused by any circulating strain. Key secondary efficacy endpoints included the absolute VE of QIV against influenza due to antigenically matching strains and immunogenicity. Safety and reactogenicity were also evaluated. In total, 1005 children received QIV and 995 received control vaccine. Influenza A/B infection due to any circulating influenza strain occurred less frequently in children who received QIV versus children receiving a control vaccine. The absolute VE of QIV against any circulating influenza strain was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37%, 66%). The absolute VE of QIV against antigenically matching influenza strains was 68% (95% CI: 45%, 81%). Mean hemagglutination inhibition titers for all influenza strains in the QIV group increased post-vaccination, whereas increases were minimal in the control vaccine group; results from virus neutralization and neuraminidase-inhibition assays were generally consistent with the hemagglutination inhibition assay findings. Approximately 12 months after primary vaccination with QIV, antibody titers remained higher than pre-vaccination titers for most strains. In participants who were revaccinated, QIV elicited strong antibody responses. The overall safety profile and reactogenicity of QIV was comparable with control vaccine. Primary vaccination with QIV was well tolerated and effective in protecting children aged 6–35 months against influenza.

Influenza vaccination plays a crucial role in reducing morbidity and mortality from influenza. However, its effectiveness varies due to multiple factors. Reliable point systems combining age, sex, BMI, vaccination history, and other baseline characteristics could aid in making evidence-based decisions regarding influenza vaccination. Using human vaccination cohort data from the University of Georgia (UGA) over multiple influenza seasons, we developed two point systems: the Simple-Test score (STS) and the No-Test score (NTS). These scores predict vaccine-elicited antibody responses measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers. Data from four influenza seasons (2016–2017 to 2019–2020) were used for model development and validation. The STS and NTS demonstrated good performance in discriminating between predicted lower-, moderate-, and higher-response groups. The AUC values for the STS were 0.943 for derivation and 0.841, 0.936, and 0.796 from the validation cohorts for 2016–2017, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020, respectively. Age, race, BMI, baseline HAI titers, and vaccination history significantly influenced the point system's performance. The point system showed robustness across age groups (teenagers, adults, and elderly). The AUC values for the NTS were 0.913 for derivation and 0.658 to 0.875 for validation datasets. We successfully developed and validated two practical point systems to predict individual-level influenza vaccine-elicited antibody responses. These systems could facilitate personalized vaccination recommendations, policymaking, and resource allocation in influenza vaccination programs. The proposed point system is also a valuable tool for targeting populations that are likely to benefit most from influenza vaccination.

Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based influenza vaccines have the potential to improve upon limitations of current vaccine approaches to seasonal influenza. Here we report findings on the primary and secondary objectives of the safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity of the quadrivalent mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1010, versus licensed standard-dose and high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines from a three-part, phase 3 clinical trial in adults aged ≥18 years (Part A), 18–64 years (Part B), and ≥ 65 years (Part C) (NCT05827978). A single 50-μg dose of mRNA-1010 elicited hemagglutination inhibition titers against vaccine-matched strains that were statistically noninferior and superior to licensed standard-dose and high-dose egg-based quadrivalent vaccine comparators. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with receipt of mRNA-1010; adverse reactions were lower in frequency and severity among adults aged ≥65 years than younger adults. No safety concerns were identified. These findings support the potential benefit of mRNA-1010 as a seasonal influenza vaccine. •Seasonal influenza viral infections are a global health concern.•mRNA platform may improve upon limitations of current influenza vaccine technology.•mRNA-1010 is an mRNA-based vaccine targeting seasonal influenza A and B strains.•mRNA-1010 elicited strong immune responses in adults of all ages.•No safety concerns were identified with mRNA-1010 in this phase 3 study.

Influenza seasons occur annually, building immune history for individuals, but the influence of this history on subsequent influenza vaccine protection remains unclear. We extracted data from an animal trial to study its potential impact. The trial involved 80 ferrets, each receiving either one type of infection or a placebo before vaccination. We quantified the vaccine protection by evaluating hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titer responses. We tested whether hosts with different infection histories exhibited similar level of responses when receiving the same vaccine for all homologous and heterologous outcomes. We observed that different pre-existing immunities were generally beneficial to vaccine induced responses, but varied in magnitude. Without pre-immunity, post-vaccination HAI titers after the 1st dose of the vaccine were less likely to be above 1:40, and a booster shot was needed. Our study suggests that pre-existing immunity may strengthen and extend the homologous and heterologous vaccine responses.

Serological detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is essential for establishing rates of seroconversion in populations, and for seeking evidence for a level of antibody that may be protective against COVID-19 disease. Several high-performance commercial tests have been described, but these require centralised laboratory facilities that are comparatively expensive, and therefore not available universally. Red cell agglutination tests do not require special equipment, are read by eye, have short development times, low cost and can be applied at the Point of Care. Here we describe a quantitative Haemagglutination test (HAT) for the detection of antibodies to the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The HAT has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 99% for detection of antibodies after a PCR diagnosed infection. We will supply aliquots of the test reagent sufficient for ten thousand test wells free of charge to qualified research groups anywhere in the world. Serological detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 can help establish rates of seroconversion. Here the authors develop a red cell agglutination test to detect antibodies against the receptor binding domain for distribution free of charge to qualified research groups.

This protocol describes how to process samples potentially containing influenza A virus (IAV), amplify the samples in chicken eggs or mammalian cells and identify whether and which IAV is present. Influenza A viruses (IAVs) cause epidemics and pandemics that result in considerable financial burden and loss of human life. To manage annual IAV epidemics and prepare for future pandemics, an improved understanding of how IAVs emerge, transmit, cause disease and acquire pandemic potential is urgently needed. Fundamental techniques essential for procuring such knowledge are IAV isolation and culture from experimental and surveillance samples. Here we present a detailed protocol for IAV sample collection and processing, amplification in chicken eggs or mammalian cells, and identification from samples containing unknown pathogens. This protocol is robust, and it allows for the generation of virus cultures that can be used for downstream analyses. Once experimental or surveillance samples are obtained, virus cultures can be generated and the presence of IAVs can be verified in 3–5 d via reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR or hemagglutination assay. Increased time frames may be required for less experienced laboratory personnel, or when large numbers of samples will be processed.

•Age and baseline HAI titers were associated with immune response to egg-free influenza vaccine.•HAI response differed by antigen level contained in prior season’s influenza vaccine.•The ideal sequence of vaccine formulations across influenza seasons remains unknown. Immune responses to influenza vaccination tend to be lower among older, frequently vaccinated adults. Use of egg-free influenza vaccines is increasing, but limited data exist on factors associated with their immunogenicity in older adults. Community-dwelling older adults ≥ 56 years of age were enrolled in a prospective, observational study of immunogenicity of 2018–2019 influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers were measured pre-vaccination (Day 0) and four weeks after vaccination (Day 28) to calculate geometric mean titers, seropositivity (HAI titers ≥ 1:40), seroconversion (fourfold rise in HAI titer with post-vaccination titer ≥ 1:40) and geometric mean fold rise (GMFR). Linear regression models assessed the association of predictors of GMFR for each vaccine antigen. Among 91 participants who received egg-free influenza vaccines, 84 (92.3 %) received quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4, Flublok, Sanofi Pasteur), and 7 (7.7 %) received quadrivalent cell culture-based influenza vaccine (ccIIV4, Flucelvax, Seqirus). Pre-vaccination seropositivity was 52.8 % for A(H1N1), 94.5 % for A(H3N2), 61.5 % for B/Colorado and 48.4 % for B/Phuket. Seroconversion by antigen ranged from 16.5 % for A(H1N1) and B/Colorado to 37.4 % for A(H3N2); 40 participants failed to seroconvert to any antigen. Factors independently associated with higher GMFR in multivariable models included lower pre-vaccination HAI antibody titer for A(H1N1), B/Colorado and B/Phuket, and younger age for A(H1N1). Overall pre-vaccination seropositivity was high and just over half of the cohort seroconverted to ≥ 1 vaccine antigen. Antibody responses were highest among participants with lower pre-vaccination titers. Among older adults with high pre-existing antibody titers, approaches to improve immune responses are needed.