Explore the vast range of titles available.

Drug-resistance mechanism in melanoma Clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying B-RAF gene mutations have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032, but many patients go on to become resistant. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms for this resistance. Nazarian et al . report that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ , and Johannessen et al . report resistance due to upregulation of MAP3K8/COT. Each of these mechanisms seems to apply to some patients in the recent PLX4032 trial, yet surprisingly, no secondary B-RAF mutations were observed. Recent data from early clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying mutations in the B-RAF gene have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032; however, many patients eventually develop resistance to this treatment. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms of resistance to PLX4032. One paper shows that upregulation of MAP3K8 (which encodes COT) can confer resistance of melanoma cells to B-RAF inhibitors, whereas another paper found that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ. Each of these resistance mechanisms seems to apply to at least some patients on recent PLX4032 trial, whereas, surprisingly, so far no secondary B-RAF mutations have been observed. Oncogenic mutations in the serine/threonine kinase B-RAF (also known as BRAF) are found in 50–70% of malignant melanomas 1 . Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that the B-RAF(V600E) mutation predicts a dependency on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling cascade in melanoma 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 —an observation that has been validated by the success of RAF and MEK inhibitors in clinical trials 7 , 8 , 9 . However, clinical responses to targeted anticancer therapeutics are frequently confounded by de novo or acquired resistance 10 , 11 , 12 . Identification of resistance mechanisms in a manner that elucidates alternative ‘druggable’ targets may inform effective long-term treatment strategies 13 . Here we expressed ∼600 kinase and kinase-related open reading frames (ORFs) in parallel to interrogate resistance to a selective RAF kinase inhibitor. We identified MAP3K8 (the gene encoding COT/Tpl2) as a MAPK pathway agonist that drives resistance to RAF inhibition in B-RAF(V600E) cell lines. COT activates ERK primarily through MEK-dependent mechanisms that do not require RAF signalling. Moreover, COT expression is associated with de novo resistance in B-RAF(V600E) cultured cell lines and acquired resistance in melanoma cells and tissue obtained from relapsing patients following treatment with MEK or RAF inhibitors. We further identify combinatorial MAPK pathway inhibition or targeting of COT kinase activity as possible therapeutic strategies for reducing MAPK pathway activation in this setting. Together, these results provide new insights into resistance mechanisms involving the MAPK pathway and articulate an integrative approach through which high-throughput functional screens may inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

About half of all melanomas harbor a mutation that results in a constitutively active BRAF kinase mutant (BRAF(V600E/K)) that can be selectively inhibited by targeted BRAF inhibitors (BRAFis). While patients treated with BRAFis initially exhibit measurable clinical improvement, the majority of patients eventually develop drug resistance and relapse. Here, we observed marked elevation of WNT5A in a subset of tumors from patients exhibiting disease progression on BRAFi therapy. WNT5A transcript and protein were also elevated in BRAFi-resistant melanoma cell lines generated by long-term in vitro treatment with BRAFi. RNAi-mediated reduction of endogenous WNT5A in melanoma decreased cell growth, increased apoptosis in response to BRAFi challenge, and decreased the activity of prosurvival AKT signaling. Conversely, overexpression of WNT5A promoted melanoma growth, tumorigenesis, and activation of AKT signaling. Similarly to WNT5A knockdown, knockdown of the WNT receptors FZD7 and RYK inhibited growth, sensitized melanoma cells to BRAFi, and reduced AKT activation. Together, these findings suggest that chronic BRAF inhibition elevates WNT5A expression, which promotes AKT signaling through FZD7 and RYK, leading to increased growth and therapeutic resistance. Furthermore, increased WNT5A expression in BRAFi-resistant melanomas correlates with a specific transcriptional signature, which identifies potential therapeutic targets to reduce clinical BRAFi resistance.

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) not only plays an important role in controlling blood pressure but also participates in almost every process to maintain homeostasis in mammals. Interest has recently increased because SARS viruses use one RAS component (ACE2) as a target-cell receptor. The occurrence of RAS in the basal ganglia suggests that the system may be targeted to improve the therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. RAS-related data led to the hypothesis that RAS receptors may interact with each other. The aim of this paper was to find heteromers formed by Mas and angiotensin receptors and to address their functionality in neurons and microglia. Novel interactions were discovered by using resonance energy transfer techniques. The functionality of individual and interacting receptors was assayed by measuring levels of the second messengers cAMP and Ca2+ in transfected human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T) and primary cultures of striatal cells. Receptor complex expression was assayed by in situ proximity ligation assay. Functionality and expression were assayed in parallel in primary cultures of microglia treated or not with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). The proximity ligation assay was used to assess heteromer expression in parkinsonian and dyskinetic conditions. Complexes formed by Mas and the angiotensin AT1 or AT2 receptors were identified in both a heterologous expression system and in neural primary cultures. In the heterologous system, we showed that the three receptors—MasR, AT1R, and AT2R—can interact to form heterotrimers. The expression of receptor dimers (AT1R-MasR or AT2R-MasR) was higher in microglia than in neurons and was differentially affected upon microglial activation with lipopolysaccharide and IFN-γ. In all cases, agonist-induced signaling was reduced upon coactivation, and in some cases just by coexpression. Also, the blockade of signaling of two receptors in a complex by the action of a given (selective) receptor antagonist (cross-antagonism) was often observed. Differential expression of the complexes was observed in the striatum under parkinsonian conditions and especially in animals rendered dyskinetic by levodopa treatment. The negative modulation of calcium mobilization (mediated by AT1R activation), the multiplicity of possibilities on RAS affecting the MAPK pathway, and the disbalanced expression of heteromers in dyskinesia yield new insight into the operation of the RAS system, how it becomes unbalanced, and how a disbalanced RAS can be rebalanced. Furthermore, RAS components in activated microglia warrant attention in drug-development approaches to address neurodegeneration.

Oncogene-targeted therapy with B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors induces a high initial response rate in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma, with a median duration of response of approximately 1 year 1 – 3 . Immunotherapy with antibodies to programmed death 1 (PD-1) produces lower response rates but with long response duration. Preclinical models suggest that combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with PD-1 blockade therapy improves antitumor activity 4 – 6 , which may provide additional treatment options for patients unlikely to have long-lasting responses to either mode of therapy alone. We enrolled 15 patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma in a first-in-human clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib and pembrolizumab ( NCT02130466 ). Eleven patients (73%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, the most common being elevation of liver function tests and pyrexia, most of which resolved with drug interruption or discontinuation of either the anti-PD-1 antibody or the targeted therapy combination. Eleven patients (73%; 95% confidence interval = 45–92%) had an objective response, and six (40%; 95% confidence interval = 16–68%) continued with a response at a median follow-up of 27 months (range = 10.3–38.4+ months) for all patients. This study suggests that this triple-combined therapy may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma by increasing the frequency of long-lasting antitumor responses. Triple therapy combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma.

Most patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged or ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, but resistance invariably develops, commonly within the CNS. This study aimed to analyse the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic properties of lorlatinib, a novel, highly potent, selective, and brain-penetrant ALK and ROS1 TKI with preclinical activity against most known resistance mutations, in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC. In this international multicentre, open-label, single-arm, first-in-man phase 1 dose-escalation study, eligible patients had advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC and were older than 18 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate end-organ function. Lorlatinib was administered orally to patients at doses ranging from 10 mg to 200 mg once daily or 35 mg to 100 mg twice daily, with a minimum of three patients receiving each dose. For some patients, tumour biopsy was done before lorlatinib treatment to identify ALK resistance mutations. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib; efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had either ALK or ROS1 rearrangement). The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 according to investigator assessment; secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and overall response. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865. Between Jan 22, 2014, and July 10, 2015, 54 patients received at least one dose of lorlatinib, including 41 (77%) with ALK-positive and 12 (23%) with ROS1-positive NSCLC; one patient had unconfirmed ALK and ROS1 status. 28 (52%) patients had received two or more TKIs, and 39 (72%) patients had CNS metastases. The most common treatment-related adverse events among the 54 patients were hypercholesterolaemia (39 [72%] of 54 patients), hypertriglyceridaemia (21 [39%] of 54 patients), peripheral neuropathy (21 [39%] of 54 patients), and peripheral oedema (21 [39%] of 54 patients). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 200 mg (the patient did not take at least 16 of 21 prescribed total daily doses in cycle 1 because of toxicities attributable to study drug, which were grade 2 neurocognitive adverse events comprising slowed speech and mentation and word-finding difficulty). No maximum tolerated dose was identified. The recommended phase 2 dose was selected as 100 mg once daily. For ALK-positive patients, the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was 19 (46%) of 41 patients (95% CI 31–63); for those who had received two or more TKIs, the proportion of patients with an objective response was 11 (42%) of 26 patients (23–63). In ROS1-positive patients, including seven crizotinib-pretreated patients, an objective response was achieved by six (50%) of 12 patients (95% CI 21–79). In this phase 1, dose-escalation study, lorlatinib showed both systemic and intracranial activity in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC, most of whom had CNS metastases and had previously had two or more TKI treatments fail. Therefore, lorlatinib might be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who have become resistant to currently available TKIs, including second-generation ALK TKIs, and is being investigated in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial comparing lorlatinib to crizotinib (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608). Pfizer.

Drug-resistance mechanism in melanoma Clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying B-RAF gene mutations have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032, but many patients go on to become resistant. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms for this resistance. Nazarian et al . report that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ , and Johannessen et al . report resistance due to upregulation of MAP3K8/COT. Each of these mechanisms seems to apply to some patients in the recent PLX4032 trial, yet surprisingly, no secondary B-RAF mutations were observed. Recent data from early clinical trials in melanoma patients carrying mutations in the B-RAF gene have shown promising results with the B-RAF kinase inhibitor PLX4032; however, many patients eventually develop resistance to this treatment. Two papers now uncover possible mechanisms of resistance to PLX4032. One paper shows that upregulation of MAP3K8 (which encodes COT) can confer resistance of melanoma cells to B-RAF inhibitors, whereas another paper found that melanomas can acquire resistance due to mutations of N-RAS or increased expression of PDGFRβ. Each of these resistance mechanisms seems to apply to at least some patients on recent PLX4032 trial, whereas, surprisingly, so far no secondary B-RAF mutations have been observed. Activating B-RAF(V600E) (also known as BRAF) kinase mutations occur in ∼7% of human malignancies and ∼60% of melanomas 1 . Early clinical experience with a novel class I RAF-selective inhibitor, PLX4032, demonstrated an unprecedented 80% anti-tumour response rate among patients with B-RAF(V600E)-positive melanomas, but acquired drug resistance frequently develops after initial responses 2 . Hypotheses for mechanisms of acquired resistance to B-RAF inhibition include secondary mutations in B-RAF(V600E) , MAPK reactivation, and activation of alternative survival pathways 3 , 4 , 5 . Here we show that acquired resistance to PLX4032 develops by mutually exclusive PDGFRβ (also known as PDGFRB) upregulation or N-RAS (also known as NRAS ) mutations but not through secondary mutations in B-RAF(V600E) . We used PLX4032-resistant sub-lines artificially derived from B-RAF(V600E) -positive melanoma cell lines and validated key findings in PLX4032-resistant tumours and tumour-matched, short-term cultures from clinical trial patients. Induction of PDGFRβ RNA, protein and tyrosine phosphorylation emerged as a dominant feature of acquired PLX4032 resistance in a subset of melanoma sub-lines, patient-derived biopsies and short-term cultures. PDGFRβ-upregulated tumour cells have low activated RAS levels and, when treated with PLX4032, do not reactivate the MAPK pathway significantly. In another subset, high levels of activated N-RAS resulting from mutations lead to significant MAPK pathway reactivation upon PLX4032 treatment. Knockdown of PDGFRβ or N-RAS reduced growth of the respective PLX4032-resistant subsets. Overexpression of PDGFRβ or N-RAS(Q61K) conferred PLX4032 resistance to PLX4032-sensitive parental cell lines. Importantly, MAPK reactivation predicts MEK inhibitor sensitivity. Thus, melanomas escape B-RAF(V600E) targeting not through secondary B-RAF(V600E) mutations but via receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-mediated activation of alternative survival pathway(s) or activated RAS-mediated reactivation of the MAPK pathway, suggesting additional therapeutic strategies.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is an important factor in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) interactions. Losartan (LOS) belongs to the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) family. Additionally, the protective role of ACE2 restored by LOS has been suggested and clinically examined in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, clinical trials with LOS have been conducted. However, the mechanism through which LOS enhances ACE2 expression remains unclear. In addition, the response of ACE2 to LOS differs among patients. Our LOS-treated patient data revealed a correlated mechanism of ACE2 with components of the renin-angiotensinogen system. We observed a significant positive regulation of MAS1 and ACE2 expression. In the context of LOS treatment of COVID-19, ACE2 expression could depend on LOS regulated MAS1. Thus, MAS1 expression could predict the COVID-19 treatment response of LOS.

Whether neutrophils exert an anti- or pro-tumorigenic function has remained controversial; now, expression of the receptor molecule MET in neutrophils is shown to be required for their ability to restrict tumour growth in several mouse cancer models, with potential implications for human cancer therapy. Anti-tumour function for MET Whether neutrophils exert and anti- or pro-tumorigenic function has remained controversial. Massimiliano Mazzone and colleagues now show in several mouse models of cancer that expression of the receptor molecule MET in neutrophils is required for their ability to restrict tumour growth. MET expression in neutrophils is triggered by inflammatory signals, which can also be tumour-derived. MET activity is required for neutrophils to cross an activated endothelium to reach a tumour and to kill cancer cells. MET has been shown to be a therapeutic target in cancer cells which express MET, therefore the findings suggest that any beneficial effect is countered by inhibition of the anti-tumour neutrophil response, and the authors indeed demonstrate this in their mouse model. These findings are of relevance to therapeutic decisions based on anti-MET drugs, where it may be useful to monitor effects of the treatment in tumours showing a neutrophil response. Mutations or amplification of the MET proto-oncogene are involved in the pathogenesis of several tumours 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , which rely on the constitutive engagement of this pathway for their growth and survival 1 , 5 . However, MET is expressed not only by cancer cells but also by tumour-associated stromal cells, although its precise role in this compartment is not well characterized 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 . Here we show that MET is required for neutrophil chemoattraction and cytotoxicity in response to its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Met deletion in mouse neutrophils enhances tumour growth and metastasis. This phenotype correlates with reduced neutrophil infiltration to both the primary tumour and metastatic sites. Similarly, Met is necessary for neutrophil transudation during colitis, skin rash or peritonitis. Mechanistically, Met is induced by tumour-derived tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α or other inflammatory stimuli in both mouse and human neutrophils. This induction is instrumental for neutrophil transmigration across an activated endothelium and for inducible nitric oxide synthase production upon HGF stimulation. Consequently, HGF/MET-dependent nitric oxide release by neutrophils promotes cancer cell killing, which abates tumour growth and metastasis. After systemic administration of a MET kinase inhibitor, we prove that the therapeutic benefit of MET targeting in cancer cells is partly countered by the pro-tumoural effect arising from MET blockade in neutrophils. Our work identifies an unprecedented role of MET in neutrophils, suggests a potential ‘Achilles’ heel’ of MET-targeted therapies in cancer, and supports the rationale for evaluating anti-MET drugs in certain inflammatory diseases.

Although the E3 ligase Mdm2 and its homologue and binding partner MdmX are the major regulators of the p53 tumor suppressor protein, it is now evident that Mdm2 and MdmX have multiple functions that do not involve p53. As one example, it is known that Mdm2 can regulate cell migration, although mechanistic insight into this function is still lacking. Here we show in cells lacking p53 expression that knockdown of Mdm2 or MdmX, as well as pharmacological inhibition of the Mdm2/MdmX complex, not only reduces cell migration and invasion, but also impairs cell spreading and focal adhesion formation. In addition, Mdm2 knockdown decreases metastasis in vivo. Interestingly, Mdm2 downregulates the expression of Sprouty4, which is required for the Mdm2 mediated effects on cell migration, focal adhesion formation and metastasis. Further, our findings indicate that Mdm2 dampening of Sprouty4 is a prerequisite for maintaining RhoA levels in the cancer cells that we have studied. Taken together we describe a molecular mechanism whereby the Mdm2/MdmX complex through Sprouty4 regulates cellular processes leading to increase metastatic capability independently of p53. The molecular mechanism of how Mdm2 regulates cell migration remains to be elucidated. Here the authors report the role of Mdm2-x complexes, independent of p53, modulates the expression of Sprouty4 and regulates the cellular processes by decreasing the metastatic capability of cancer cells.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare systemic disorder characterized by the accumulation of CD1a+/Langerin+ LCH cells and wide‐ranging organ involvement. Langerhans cell histiocytosis was formerly referred to as histiocytosis X, until it was renamed in 1987. Langerhans cell histiocytosis β was named for its morphological similarity to skin Langerhans cells. Studies have shown that LCH cells originate from myeloid dendritic cells rather than skin Langerhans cells. There has been significant debate regarding whether LCH should be defined as an immune disorder or a neoplasm. A breakthrough in understanding the pathogenesis of LCH occurred in 2010 when a gain‐of‐function mutation in BRAF (V600E) was identified in more than half of LCH patient samples. Studies have since reported that 100% of LCH cases show ERK phosphorylation, indicating that LCH is likely to be a clonally expanding myeloid neoplasm. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is now defined as an inflammatory myeloid neoplasm in the revised 2016 Histiocyte Society classification. Randomized trials and novel approaches have led to improved outcomes for pediatric patients, but no well‐defined treatments for adult patients have been developed to date. Although LCH is not fatal in all cases, delayed diagnosis or treatment can result in serious impairment of organ function and decreased quality of life. This study summarizes recent advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of adult LCH, to raise awareness of this “orphan disease”. Recent studies have shown that Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a clonally expanding myeloid neoplasm. Although LCH is not always fatal, delayed diagnosis or treatment can result in serious impairment of organ function and decreased quality of life. This study summarizes recent advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of adult LCH, to raise awareness of this “orphan disease”.