Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Degenerative spinal deformity afflicts a significant portion of the elderly and is increasing in prevalence. Recent evidence has revealed sagittal plane malalignment to be a key driver of pain and disability in this population and has led to a significant shift toward a more evidence-based management paradigm. In this narrative review, we review the recent literature on the epidemiology, evaluation, management, and outcomes of degenerative adult spinal deformity (ASD). ASD is increasing in prevalence in North America due to an aging population and demographic shifts. It results from cumulative degenerative changes focused in the intervertebral discs and facet joints that occur asymmetrically to produce deformity. Deformity correction focuses on restoration of global alignment, especially in the sagittal plane, and decompression of the neural elements. General realignment goals have been established, including sagittal vertical axis <50 mm, pelvic tilt <22°, and lumbopelvic mismatch <±9°; however, these should be tailored to the patient. Operative management, in carefully selected patients, yields satisfactory outcomes that appear to be superior to nonoperative strategies. ASD is characterized by malalignment in the sagittal and/or coronal plane and, in adults, presents with pain and disability. Nonoperative management is recommended for patients with mild, nonprogressive symptoms; however, evidence of its efficacy is limited. Surgery aims to restore global spinal alignment, decompress neural elements, and achieve fusion with minimal complications. The surgical approach should balance the desired correction with the increased risk of more aggressive maneuvers. In well-selected patients, surgery yields excellent outcomes.

Study Design Multicenter comparative cohort. Objective Studies have shown markedly higher rates of complications and all-cause mortality following surgery for adult cervical deformity (ACD) compared with adult thoracolumbar deformity (ATLD), though the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Our objectives were to compare baseline frailty, disability, and comorbidities between ACD and complex ATLD patients undergoing surgery. Methods Two multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity registries were queried, one ATLD and one ACD. Baseline clinical and frailty measures were compared between the cohorts. Results 616 patients were identified (107 ACD and 509 ATLD). These groups had similar mean age (64.6 vs 60.8 years, respectively, P = .07). ACD patients were less likely to be women (51.9% vs 69.5%, P < .001) and had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.5 vs .9, P < .001) and ASA grade (2.7 vs 2.4, P < .001). ACD patients had worse VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS, 25.7 vs 29.9, P < .001) and PROMIS Physical Function Score (33.3 vs 35.3, P = .031). All frailty measures were significantly worse for ACD patients, including hand dynamometer (44.6 vs 55.6 lbs, P < .001), CSHA Clinical Frailty Score (CFS, 4.0 vs 3.2, P < .001), and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS, 5.15 vs 3.21, P < .001). Greater proportions of ACD patients were frail (22.9% vs 5.7%) or vulnerable (15.6% vs 10.9%) based on EFS (P < .001). Conclusions Compared with ATLD patients, ACD patients had worse baseline characteristics on all measures assessed (comorbidities/disability/frailty). These differences may help account for greater risk of complications and all-cause mortality previously observed in ACD patients and facilitate strategies for better preoperative optimization.

Purpose To report all complications that occurred during the 2 to 5-year postoperative period, describe reoperations during this time period, and compare patients who did and did not have major, surgery-related complications and/or reoperations during this time period. Methods The Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers. Inclusion criteria were Cobb angle of > 80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital/revision deformity, and/or 3-column osteotomy. At each follow-up visit, any neurologic or non-neurologic adverse event(AE) was documented & categorized. Results 77 patients had a minimum 5-year follow-up. 35 surgery-related AE’s occurred during the 2 to 5-year period in 25(32.5%) patients. 23/35(65.7%) major, surgery-related complications occurred in 17 patients, 22/35(62.9%) requiring reoperations in 16 patients. Rod fracture and/or pseudarthrosis was the most common complication. The most common minor, surgery-related complication was asymptomatic rod fractures with no alignment changes. Four neurological complications were reported, one of which did not require reoperation. One death occurred at 6.1 years postoperative after multiple reoperations for mechanical complications. 14/17(82.4%) patients with major, surgery-related complication had a preceding AE during the initial 2-year postoperative period. 53 non-surgery-related AEs occurred in 21(27.3%) patients with musculoskeletal(37.7%) occurring most often. No differences were observed in ODI or SRS-22r in those with/without major surgery-related complications or those with/without reoperation. Conclusion During the study period, 25(32.5%) patients experienced 35 surgery-related complications, of which 23(65.7%) were major. Rod fracture with pseudarthrosis was the most common major, surgery-related complication. Neurologic complications were not found to be major drivers of reoperation. Surprisingly, PROs were similar in those with/without a major, surgery-related complication during the study period. presentation This work has been presented as a podium presentation at the 55th Scoliosis Research Society annual meeting, Sep 9–13, 2020.

Background A precise comparison of supine and standing whole spine alignment in both the coronal and sagittal planes, including the pelvic parameters, has not been reported. Furthermore, previous studies investigated positional differences in the Cobb angle only in young patients with idiopathic scoliosis. The difference in alignment has never been investigated in a population of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). In most cases, ASD patients are aware of the symptoms when standing and tend to stoop with back pain, whereas the symptoms disappear when lying on a bed. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the positional differences in the deformity in older adults. The purposes of this study are to establish a method for comparing whole spine alignment between supine and standing, and to clarify the positional difference of the alignment in the patients with ASD. Methods Twenty-four patients with ASD (mean age: 60.1 years, range 20–80 years; 24 women) were evaluated. A slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager (EOS) was used to assess the whole spine in the standing position. Computed tomography was used to assess the whole spine in the supine position. The computed tomography DICOM dataset of the whole spine in the supine position was transformed to two-dimensional (coronal and sagittal) digital reconstructed radiography images. The digital reconstructed radiography images were input for three-dimensional measurement by the EOS software and compared with the standing whole spine alignment measured by EOS. Results The mean intraclass correlation coefficients (supine, standing) of intra-rater / inter-rater reliabilities for the measured parameters were 0.981, 0.984 / 0.970, 0.986, respectively. The Cobb and rotation angles of the major curve, mostly the thoracolumbar area, were significantly greater in the standing position than in the supine position. Lumbar lordosis during standing was significantly kyphotic. With respect to the pelvic parameters, the sacral slope was significantly smaller in the standing position than in the supine position. Pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence were significantly greater in the standing position than in the supine position. Conclusions The lumbar to pelvic parameters and the major curve in standing position significantly deteriorate compared with the supine position in patients with ASD.

Study Design Multicenter cohort. Objectives A report from the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) noted that surgeons failed to achieve alignment goals in nearly two-thirds of 266 complex adult deformity surgery (CADS) cases. We assess whether personalized interbody spacers are associated with improved rates of achieving goal alignment following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods ASD patients were included if their surgery utilized 3D-printed personalized interbody spacer(s) and they met ISSG CADS inclusion criteria. Planned alignment was personalized by the surgeon during interbody planning. Planned vs achieved alignment was assessed and compared with the ISSG CADS series that used stock interbodies. Results For 65 patients with personalized interbodies, 62% were women, mean age was 70.3 years (SD = 8.3), mean instrumented levels was 9.9 (SD = 4.1), and the mean number of personalized interbodies per patient was 2.2 (SD = .8). Segmental alignment was achieved close to plan for levels with personalized interbodies, with mean difference between goal and achieved as follows: intervertebral lordosis = .9° (SD = 5.2°), intervertebral coronal angle = .1° (SD = 4.7°), and posterior disc height = −0.1 mm (SD = 2.3 mm). Achieved pelvic incidence-to-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) correlated significantly with goal PI-LL (r = .668, P < .001). Compared with the ISSG CADS cohort, utilization of personalized interbodies resulted in significant improvement in achieving PI-LL <5° of plan (P = .046) and showed a significant reduction in cases with PI-LL >15° of plan (P = .012). Conclusions This study supports use of personalized interbodies as a means of better achieving goal segmental sagittal and coronal alignment and significantly improving achievement of goal PI-LL compared with stock devices.

IntroductionNeurologic complications after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery are important, yet outcomes are heterogeneously reported, and long-term follow-up of actual lower extremity motor function is unknown.ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate lower extremity motor function scores (LEMS) before and at 5 years after surgical correction of complex ASD.DesignRetrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter, international observational study. MethodsThe Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers around the world. Inclusion criteria were Cobb angle of > 80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital or revision deformity and/or 3-column osteotomy. Among patients with 5-year follow-up, comparisons of LEMS to baseline and within each follow-up period were made via documented neurologic exams on each patient. ResultsSeventy-seven (28.3%) patients had 5-year follow-up. Among these 77 patients with 5-year follow-up, rates of postoperative LEMS deterioration were: 14.3% hospital discharge, 10.7% at 6 weeks, 6.5% at 6 months, 9.5% at 2 years and 9.3% at 5 years postoperative. During the 2–5 year window, while mean LEMS did not change significantly (−0.5, p = 0.442), eight (11.1%) patients deteriorated (of which 3 were ≥ 4 motor points), and six (8.3%) patients improved (of which 2 were ≥ 4 points). Of the 14 neurologic complications, four (28.6%) were surgery-related, three of which required reoperation. While mean LEMS were not impacted in patients with a major surgery-related complication, mean LEMS were significantly lower in patients with neurologic surgery-related complications at discharge (p = 0.041) and 6 months (p = 0.008) between the two groups as well as the change from baseline to 5 years (p = 0.041). ConclusionsIn 77 patients undergoing complex ASD surgery with 5-year follow-up, while mean LEMS did not change from 2 to 5 years, subtle neurologic changes occurred in approximately 1 in 5 patients (11.1% deteriorated; 8.3% improved). Major surgery-related complication did not result in decreased LEMS; however, those with neurologic surgery-related complications continued to have decreased lower extremity motor function at 5 years postoperative. These results underscore the importance of long-term follow-up to 5 years, using individual motor scores rather than group averages, and comparing outcomes to both baseline and last follow-up.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pelvic tilt (PT) is a compensatory mechanism for adult spinal deformity patients to mitigate sagittal imbalance. The association between preop PT and postop clinical and radiographic outcomes has not been well studied in patients undergoing minimally invasive adult deformity surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with high and low preoperative PT treated surgically using less invasive techniques. METHODS Retrospective case-control, institutional review board-approved study. A multicenter, minimally invasive surgery spinal deformity patient database was queried for 2-yr follow-up with complete radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data. Hybrid surgery patients were excluded. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 18 and either coronal Cobb angle > 20, sagittal vertical axis > 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10 or PT > 20. Patients were stratified by preop PT as per Schwab classification: low (PT< 20), mid (PT 20-30), or high (>30). Postoperative radiographic alignment parameters (PT, PI, LL, Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis) and HRQOL data (Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg, Oswestry Disability Index) were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS One hundred sixty-five patients had complete 2-yr outcomes data, and 64 patients met inclusion criteria (25 low, 21 mid, 18 high PT). High PT group had higher preop PI-LL mismatch (32.1 vs 4.7; P < .001). At last follow-up, 76.5% of patients in the high PT group had continued PI-LL mismatch compared to 34.8% in the low PT group (P < .006). There was a difference between groups in terms of postop changes of PT (–3.9 vs 1.9), LL (8.7 vs 0.5), and PI-LL (–9.5 vs 0.1). Postoperatively, HRQOL data (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale) were significantly improved in both groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION Adult deformity patients with high preoperative PT treated with minimally invasive surgical techniques had less radiographic success but equivalent clinical outcomes as patients with low PT.

Purpose This study aimed to introduce a novel method for assessing intraoperative coronal alignment in posterior spinal deformity surgery and to investigate its feasibility and efficacy in preventing postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB). Methods All enrolled patients underwent posterior spinal deformity surgery, with dot-line method employed to evaluate coronal alignment intraoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. Additionally, patients were divided into type A, B, and C preoperatively, and subgroup analysis was conducted to further assess the effectiveness of this new method. Results Of 46 patients with preoperative CIB, 16 were classified as type B and 30 as type C. The prevalence of CIB was 11.70% at the final follow-up. Preoperative main Cobb angle averaged 55.39 ± 28.22° and improved to 15.19 ± 10.65° at the final follow-up ( P < 0.05). Preoperative CBD corrected from 23.06 ± 16.77 mm preoperatively to 18.77 ± 14.48 mm at the final follow-up ( P < 0.05). SVA was 34.59 ± 22.66 mm before surgery and 20.12 ± 12.21 mm at the final follow-up ( P < 0.05). VAS score and SRS-22 score demonstrated significant improvements had at the final follow up ( P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed postoperative CIB in 2 patients with type A, 4 patients with type B, and 5 patients with type C. Conclusion Dot-line method is a viable technique for intraoperative assessment of coronal alignment in posterior spinal deformity surgery, effectively reducing and preventing postoperative CIB.

Background and Objectives: In this retrospective cohort study, we investigate associations between the Hounsfield units (HU) value of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Materials and Methods: The cohort consisted of 60 patients (mean age 71.7 years) who underwent long instrumented fusion surgery (≥6 vertebrae) for ASD with at least 1 year of follow-up. The preoperative bone mineral density (BMD) measured on DXA scans, the HU values at UIV and UIV+1, and the radiographic parameters were compared between the PJK and non-PJK groups. The severity of UIV fracture was assessed using a semiquantitative (SQ) grade. Results: PJK occurred in 43% of patients. No significant differences in patient age, sex, BMD, and preoperative radiographic parameters were observed between the PJK and non-PJK groups. The HU values of the UIV (103.4 vs. 149.0, p < 0.001) and UIV+1 (102.0 vs. 145.7, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the PJK group. The cutoff values of HU at UIV and UIV+1 were 122.8 and 114.9, respectively. Lower HU values at UIV (Grade 1: 134.2, Grade 2: 109.6, Grade 3: 81.1, p < 0.001) and UIV+1 (Grade 1: 131.5, Grade 2: 107.1, Grade 3: 82.1, p < 0.001) were associated with severe SQ grade. Conclusions: Lower HU values at UIV and UIV+1 had a negative impact on signal incidence of PJK and were correlated with the severity of UIV fractures. Preoperative treatment of osteoporosis seems necessary for preoperative UIV HU values less than 120.

As adult spinal deformity surgery is performed more and more, the spine surgeon is faced with the challenge to treat pseudoarthrosis. The presentation may vary, from asymptomatic patients, who should be observed in most of the cases, to patients with acute episode of broken rods, and or chronic pain with often trunk imbalance. In some instances, patients will present with neurologic symptoms. The evaluation of such patients must start with a good understanding of why the surgery failed first place. Poor host, smoking, lack of anterior column support, poor sagittal balance, lack of fusion, poor construct. Often a combination of all of the above is encountered. The workup for such cases consists of imaging studies (with often a CT myelogram as the excessive metal artifact will render the MRI imaging useless), nutrition labs, DEXA scan, EOS films and internal medicine or cardiology consult for risk stratification as this may represent major surgery. Indication of surgery is mostly based on pain and imbalance and/or poor function. The surgeon planning a revision adult deformity surgery has many tasks to perform: Identify and avoid the reasons that lead to failure of the previous surgeries. Plan the anterior column reconstruction either through posterior or anterior interbody fusion. Restore the global alignment through anterior or posterior osteotomies to achieve sagittal and coronal balance. Obtain a solid fixation with sufficient levels above and below the osteotomies sites with in some cases the use of pelvic screws and four rods (Quad-Rod) techniques. The use of bone graft (either autologous, allograft, bone graft enhancers and inducer) agents. The requirement of decompression either through a virgin spine or a previous laminectomy bed. Despite the extent of these surgeries and the potential for immediate postoperative complications, the outcome is in most cases satisfactory if these goals are achieved. In this review, the authors explore different scenarios for pseudoarthrosis in the adult spine deformity patient and the preferred treatment method to obtain the best outcome for every individual patient.Graphic abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.