Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: The vitamin D metabolite ratio (VMR) has recently been identified as a potentially better indicator of vitamin D deficiency than 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) alone. This study aims to validate these findings by demonstrating that VMR is more strongly correlated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels than 25(OH)D and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)2D). In addition, the study investigates VMR as a more effective predictor of mortality than 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D. Methods: The SarcoPhAge cohort is a Belgian cohort of community-dwelling older adults. Levels of 25(OH)D and 24,25(OH)2D were measured in 204 serum samples collected at the second year of follow-up using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), and VMR was calculated using the formula: VMR = (24,25(OH)D/25(OH)D) × 100. Vitamin D deficiency cut-offs were defined at 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL, 24,25(OH)2D < 1.2 ng/mL, or VMR < 4% according to previously proposed cut-offs. Participants were followed for up to 9 years. Results: A total of 35 individuals (17.2%) had 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL, 40 individuals (19.6%) had 24,25(OH)2D < 1.2 ng/mL, and 14 individuals (7.0%) had VMR < 4%. All three markers, 25(OH)D, 24,25(OH)2D, and VMR, were independently associated with PTH levels, with VMR showing the strongest correlation (rho: −0.292; p < 0.0001). When categorized into quartiles, only 24,25(OH)2D and VMR showed significant increases in PTH levels across quartiles (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). When cut-offs for low vitamin D status were applied, patients with low VMR had the highest rate of all-cause mortality. However, in a Cox proportional hazard regression model, both low VMR profile and low 25(OH)D profile were risk factors for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: This study confirms that VMR is an efficient biomarker for assessing functional vitamin D deficiency.

Abstract Background Numerous studies demonstrate associations between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and a variety of common disorders, including musculoskeletal, metabolic, cardiovascular, malignant, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Although a causal link between serum 25(OH)D concentrations and many disorders has not been clearly established, these associations have led to widespread supplementation with vitamin D and increased laboratory testing for 25(OH)D in the general population. The benefit-risk ratio of this increase in vitamin D use is not clear, and the optimal vitamin D intake and the role of testing for 25(OH)D for disease prevention remain uncertain. Objective To develop clinical guidelines for the use of vitamin D (cholecalciferol [vitamin D3] or ergocalciferol [vitamin D2]) to lower the risk of disease in individuals without established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, along with experts in guideline methodology and systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 14 clinically relevant questions related to the use of vitamin D and 25(OH)D testing to lower the risk of disease. The panel prioritized randomized placebo-controlled trials in general populations (without an established indication for vitamin D treatment or 25[OH]D testing), evaluating the effects of empiric vitamin D administration throughout the lifespan, as well as in select conditions (pregnancy and prediabetes). The panel defined “empiric supplementation” as vitamin D intake that (a) exceeds the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) and (b) is implemented without testing for 25(OH)D. Systematic reviews queried electronic databases for publications related to these 14 clinical questions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and guide recommendations. The approach incorporated perspectives from a patient representative and considered patient values, costs and resources required, acceptability and feasibility, and impact on health equity of the proposed recommendations. The process to develop this clinical guideline did not use a risk assessment framework and was not designed to replace current DRI for vitamin D. Results The panel suggests empiric vitamin D supplementation for children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years to prevent nutritional rickets and because of its potential to lower the risk of respiratory tract infections; for those aged 75 years and older because of its potential to lower the risk of mortality; for those who are pregnant because of its potential to lower the risk of preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age birth, and neonatal mortality; and for those with high-risk prediabetes because of its potential to reduce progression to diabetes. Because the vitamin D doses in the included clinical trials varied considerably and many trial participants were allowed to continue their own vitamin D–containing supplements, the optimal doses for empiric vitamin D supplementation remain unclear for the populations considered. For nonpregnant people older than 50 years for whom vitamin D is indicated, the panel suggests supplementation via daily administration of vitamin D, rather than intermittent use of high doses. The panel suggests against empiric vitamin D supplementation above the current DRI to lower the risk of disease in healthy adults younger than 75 years. No clinical trial evidence was found to support routine screening for 25(OH)D in the general population, nor in those with obesity or dark complexion, and there was no clear evidence defining the optimal target level of 25(OH)D required for disease prevention in the populations considered; thus, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in all populations considered. The panel judged that, in most situations, empiric vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive, feasible, acceptable to both healthy individuals and health care professionals, and has no negative effect on health equity. Conclusion The panel suggests empiric vitamin D for those aged 1 to 18 years and adults over 75 years of age, those who are pregnant, and those with high-risk prediabetes. Due to the scarcity of natural food sources rich in vitamin D, empiric supplementation can be achieved through a combination of fortified foods and supplements that contain vitamin D. Based on the absence of supportive clinical trial evidence, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in the absence of established indications. These recommendations are not meant to replace the current DRIs for vitamin D, nor do they apply to people with established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Further research is needed to determine optimal 25(OH)D levels for specific health benefits.

Abstract Background 25-Hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] may be a poor marker of vitamin D status as it reflects differences in vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) between individuals. The vitamin D metabolite ratio [VMR, ratio of 24,25(OH)2D3 to 25(OH)D3] is a marker of vitamin D status that has been hypothesized to be independent of variability in VDBP. This hypothesis has not been directly evaluated. Methods We measured 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, 1,25(OH)2D3, and VDBP in 377 community-dwelling older adults that participated in the Health Aging and Body Composition Study. 24,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3 were used to calculate the VMR. We used linear regression to assess the relationship between VDBP with the VMR, 24,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3. Results Participants had mean age 75 ± 3 years, 52% were female, 40% were black, and 24% had chronic kidney disease. VDBP concentrations were associated with sex, serum albumin, and VDBP phenotype in multivariable models. In fully adjusted models, each 1% higher VDBP was associated with a 0.92%[95% CI(0.37,1.49%)], 0.76% (0.39, 1.13%), and 0.57% (0.29, 0.85%), higher 24,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3. The VMR was independent of VDBP concentration, [0.16%(-0.11, 0.44) higher VMR per 1% higher VDBP, P = .25]. Conclusions The VMR was independent of VDBP concentration, whereas VDBP was strongly directly associated with the individual vitamin D metabolite concentrations. Prior studies evaluating only 25(OH)D3 may have been confounded by absence of data on VDBP status. The VMR may serve as an important biomarker of vitamin D status and clinical outcomes that can be utilized in populations with a large spectrum of VDBP concentrations.

Prior studies showed conflicting results regarding the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and mineral metabolism in end-stage renal disease. In order to determine whether the bioavailable vitamin D (that fraction not bound to vitamin D–binding protein) associates more strongly with measures of mineral metabolism than total levels, we identified 94 patients with previously measured 25(OH)D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) from a cohort of incident hemodialysis patients. Vitamin D–binding protein was measured from stored serum samples. Bioavailable 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D were determined using previously validated formulae. Associations with demographic factors and measures of mineral metabolism were examined. When compared with whites, black patients had lower levels of total, but not bioavailable, 25(OH)D. Bioavailable, but not total, 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D were each significantly correlated with serum calcium. In univariate and multivariate regression analysis, only bioavailable 25(OH)D was significantly associated with parathyroid hormone levels. Hence, bioavailable vitamin D levels are better correlated with measures of mineral metabolism than total levels in patients on hemodialysis.

The current study aimed to explore the combined and individual effects of vitamin D (VitD) status in three trimesters during pregnancy and cord blood (CB) on child growth trajectories from birth to 4 years of age. Pregnant women (n = 1100) were recruited between 2013 and 2016 in the Shanghai Birth Cohort (SBC) Study. A total of 959 mother–child dyads were included. VitD status was measured by LC-MS/MS at three trimesters (T1, T2, T3) and CB. Children’s weight, length/height, and head circumference were assessed at birth, 42 days, 6, 12, 24 months, and 4 years of age, and standardized into z-scores [weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), length-for-age z-score (LAZ), head circumference-for-age z-score (HCZ) and weight-for-length z-score (WLZ)]. Using the group-based trajectory model (GBTM), the trajectories of the four growth parameters were categorized into discrete groups. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to analyze the mixed effect of 25(OH)D throughout pregnancy on growth trajectories. The association between 25(OH)D status and each growth trajectory group was examined by multivariable logistic regression. Each 10 ng/mL increase in 25(OH) throughout three trimesters was not associated with four anthropometric parameters. Each 10 ng/mL increase in VitD in T3 was associated with a lower risk in the WAZ high-increasing trajectory (aOR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.91; p < 0.01). Each 10 ng/mL increase in VitD in CB was associated with a lower risk in the WAZ high-increasing trajectory (aOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.76; p < 0.01). No significant association was found between maternal or CB VitD and LAZ or HCZ. Three trimesters’ VitD throughout pregnancy had no persistent effect on the offspring’s growth trajectory. However, higher VitD status in the third trimester and CB related to a lower risk of high-increasing WAZ from birth to 4 years of age. Elevated VitD levels in late pregnancy and cord blood may protect against continuous early-life weight growth at high levels.

The precursor of the active form of vitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), is recognized as the optimal indicator of vitamin D status. Vitamin D3 undergoes conversion through a multitude of enzymatic reactions described within the paper, and vitamin D levels are dependent on many factors including the vitamin D binding protein (DBP). The free hormone hypothesis postulates that protein-bound hormones are not biologically available and that unbound hormones are biologically active. The majority of circulating 25(OH)D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is tightly bound to DBP and albumin, with less than 1% circulating in an unbound form. As a result, factors affecting DBP alter the interpretation of 25(OH)D levels. The aim of this review is to assess the current methodology used to measure total and free 25(OH)D, and DBP. Additionally, we analyze the effects of other endocrine hormones and disease processes on DBP levels and subsequently, the interpretation of 25(OH)D levels. CF = cystic fibrosis DBP = vitamin D binding protein ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ESLD = end-stage liver disease HC = hormone contraceptives iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone LC-MS = liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry MS = multiple sclerosis 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D PHPT = primary hyperparathyroidism RIA = radioimmunoassay.

Preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks’ gestation) is a persistent problem in the United States that affects non-Hispanic Black women at much higher rates than White women. Several biomarkers have been associated with PTB, including vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and low levels of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP). However, no biomarker has been found to predict PTB. To identify a predictive biomarker of PTB, gene expression differences were determined in Black women with PTB and full-term births and between women with high and low levels of plasma vitamin D and high and low VDBP levels. In this pilot study of 19 pregnant women from the Biosocial Impact on Black Births (BIBB) study, we found that 47 genes were upregulated and 16 genes were downregulated in women with PTB as compared with women who had a full-term birth, 361 genes were downregulated and 61 genes were upregulated in women with VDD as compared with those that had vitamin D sufficiency, and 44 genes were upregulated and 295 were downregulated in women with low VDBP. Several genes expressed by neutrophils were downregulated in the PTB, VDD, and low VDBP groups. These findings support the idea that vitamin D and VDBP status may be important clinical markers influencing the gene expression of genes associated with PTB.

Vitamin D is responsible for regulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism and maintaining a healthy mineralized skeleton. It is also known as an immunomodulatory hormone. Experimental studies have shown that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, the active form of vitamin D, exerts immunologic activities on multiple components of the innate and adaptive immune system as well as endothelial membrane stability. Association between low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased risk of developing several immune-related diseases and disorders, including psoriasis, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, sepsis, respiratory infection, and COVID-19, has been observed. Accordingly, a number of clinical trials aiming to determine the efficacy of administration of vitamin D and its metabolites for treatment of these diseases have been conducted with variable outcomes. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that some individuals might benefit from vitamin D more or less than others as high inter-individual difference in broad gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to vitamin D supplementation has been observed. Although it is still debatable what level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is optimal, it is advisable to increase vitamin D intake and have sensible sunlight exposure to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L), and preferably at 40–60 ng/mL (100–150 nmol/L) to achieve the optimal overall health benefits of vitamin D.

Abstract Context Vitamin D is classically recognized as a regulator of calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Recent advances in the measurement of vitamin D metabolites, diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency, and clinical observations have led to an appreciation that along with its role in skeletal metabolism, vitamin D may well have an important role in nonclassical settings. Measurement of the circulating form of vitamin D that best describes total body stores, namely 25-hydroxyvitamin D, can be unreliable despite many sophisticated methodologies that have been proposed and implemented. Likewise, evidence from clinical studies showing a beneficial role of vitamin D in different disease states has been controversial and at times speculative. Moreover, the target concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to address a number of putative links between vitamin D inadequacy and nonskeletal diseases are further areas of uncertainty. Setting To address these issues, an international conference on “Controversies in Vitamin D” was held in Pisa, Italy, in June 2017. Three main topics were addressed: (i) vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D; (ii) skeletal and extraskeletal effects of vitamin D; (iii) therapeutics of vitamin D. Results This report provides a summary of the deliberations of the expert panels of the conference. Conclusions Despite great advances in our appreciation of vitamin D metabolism, measurements, biological actions on classical and nonclassical tissues, and therapeutics, all of which this report summarizes, much more work remains to be done so that our knowledge base can become even more secure. This summary statement reports the deliberations and conclusions of an international conference on “Controversies in Vitamin D.”

Vitamin D is a key micronutrient in the function of the skeletomuscular system. Athletes are at increased risk of developing vitamin D deficiency during the execution of very demanding disciplines such as CrossFit®. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may influence circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels. An observational, longitudinal pilot study was conducted with 50 trained males according to specific inclusion criteria. Blood samples were obtained to determine 25(OH)D, vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), vitamin D-receptor (VDR)circulating levels, and the presence of SNPs after DNA isolation and genotyping: rs10741657 to CYP2R1, rs2282679 to GC and rs2228570 to VDR genes. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in 25(OH)D concentration were determined between the biallelic combinations of rs228679 (GC) and rs228570 (VDR). The VDBP and VDR proteins did not show different levels in the case of the rs10741657 (CYP2R1) alleles. Statistically significant weak positive correlations (p < 0.05) were observed between 25(OH)D and AA-alleles of the CYP2R1 and VDR genes, and TT-alleles of the GC gene. Additionally, AA (rs10741657 and rs2228570) and TT (rs2282679) have a probability between 2 and 4 of having major effects on the concentration of 25(OH)D. Conversely, GG alleles present a probability of suboptimal values of 25(OH)D of 69%, 34%, and 24% for VDR, GC, and CYP2R1, respectively, showing a strong moderate positive correlation (r = 0.41) between the degrees of sports performance and 25(OH)D plasma levels. CYP2R1 (rs10741657), GC (rs2282679), and VDR (rs2228570) affect the concentration of serum 25(OH)D, as an indicator of vitamin D status and play a critical role in the sports performance of CrossFit® practitioners.