Explore the vast range of titles available.

Short-term treatment for people with type 2 diabetes using a low dose of the selective endothelin A receptor antagonist atrasentan reduces albuminuria without causing significant sodium retention. We report the long-term effects of treatment with atrasentan on major renal outcomes. We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at 689 sites in 41 countries. We enrolled adults aged 18–85 years with type 2 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25–75 mL/min per 1·73 m2 of body surface area, and a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 300–5000 mg/g who had received maximum labelled or tolerated renin–angiotensin system inhibition for at least 4 weeks. Participants were given atrasentan 0·75 mg orally daily during an enrichment period before random group assignment. Those with a UACR decrease of at least 30% with no substantial fluid retention during the enrichment period (responders) were included in the double-blind treatment period. Responders were randomly assigned to receive either atrasentan 0·75 mg orally daily or placebo. All patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was a composite of doubling of serum creatinine (sustained for ≥30 days) or end-stage kidney disease (eGFR <15 mL/min per 1·73 m2 sustained for ≥90 days, chronic dialysis for ≥90 days, kidney transplantation, or death from kidney failure) in the intention-to-treat population of all responders. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned study treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01858532. Between May 17, 2013, and July 13, 2017, 11 087 patients were screened; 5117 entered the enrichment period, and 4711 completed the enrichment period. Of these, 2648 patients were responders and were randomly assigned to the atrasentan group (n=1325) or placebo group (n=1323). Median follow-up was 2·2 years (IQR 1·4–2·9). 79 (6·0%) of 1325 patients in the atrasentan group and 105 (7·9%) of 1323 in the placebo group had a primary composite renal endpoint event (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [95% CI 0·49–0·88]; p=0·0047). Fluid retention and anaemia adverse events, which have been previously attributed to endothelin receptor antagonists, were more frequent in the atrasentan group than in the placebo group. Hospital admission for heart failure occurred in 47 (3·5%) of 1325 patients in the atrasentan group and 34 (2·6%) of 1323 patients in the placebo group (HR 1·33 [95% CI 0·85–2·07]; p=0·208). 58 (4·4%) patients in the atrasentan group and 52 (3·9%) in the placebo group died (HR 1·09 [95% CI 0·75–1·59]; p=0·65). Atrasentan reduced the risk of renal events in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease who were selected to optimise efficacy and safety. These data support a potential role for selective endothelin receptor antagonists in protecting renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of developing end-stage kidney disease. AbbVie.

In a study of fluid resuscitation, patients received 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES; 130/0.4) or saline until ICU discharge or death or for 90 days. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality, although more patients in the HES group received renal-replacement therapy. The administration of intravenous fluids to increase intravascular volume is a frequent intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU), but the choice of resuscitation fluid remains controversial. 1 , 2 Globally, 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) is the most commonly used fluid, although colloids are administered as often as crystalloids, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is the most frequently used colloid. 3 Several studies have questioned the safety of HES in critically ill patients, with particular concern that its use increases the risk of acute kidney injury. 4 , 5 Most concern has focused on the use of concentrated HES solutions (10%) with a molecular weight of . . .

Serum creatinine levels are the most used clinical marker to estimate renal function as the glomerular function rate because it is simple, fast, and inexpensive. However, creatinine has limitations, as its levels can be influenced by factors such as advanced age, physical activity, protein-rich diets, male gender, medications, and ethnicity. Serum cystatin C and its combination with serum creatinine may serve as an alternative since these factors do not affect it. Most creatinine synthesis occurs in the muscles, making it a valuable marker for assessing lean body mass within body composition. This measurement is crucial for evaluating and monitoring nutritional status in patients with chronic kidney disease. This review aimed to discuss the literature on creatinine metabolism, its advantages and disadvantages in assessing renal function, and its utility in measuring lean body mass. The variability in the creatinine generation rate among individuals should be considered when assessing the glomerular function rate.

Urinary biomarkers, such as albumin and other markers of kidney injury, are frequently reported as a normalized ratio to urinary creatinine (UCr) concentration [UCr] to control for variations in urine flow rate. The implicit assumption is that UCr excretion is constant across and within individuals, such that changes in the ratio will reflect changes in biomarker excretion. Using computer simulations of creatinine kinetics, we found that normalized levels of a biomarker reflecting tubular injury can be influenced by dynamic changes in the UCr excretion rate when the glomerular filtration rate changes. Actual timed urine collections from hospitalized patients with changing glomerular filtration rates and/or critical illness exhibited variability in UCr excretion rates across and within individuals. Normalization by [UCr] may, therefore, result in an underestimation or overestimation of the biomarker excretion rate depending on the clinical context. Lower creatinine excretion in the setting of acute kidney injury or poor renal allograft function may amplify a tubular injury biomarker signal, thereby increasing its clinical utility. The variability of creatinine excretion, however, will complicate the determination of a threshold value for normalized biomarkers of acute or chronic kidney disease, including albumin. Thus, we suggest that the most accurate method to quantify biomarkers requires the collection of timed urine specimens to estimate the actual excretion rate, provided that the biomarker is stable over the period of collection. This ideal must be balanced, however, against practical considerations.

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for the initial therapy of lupus nephritis (LN).Study designThis is an open randomised controlled parallel group study.MethodsAdult patients with biopsy-confirmed active LN (class III/IV/V) were randomised to receive prednisolone (0.6 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks and tapered) in combination with either TAC (0.06–0.1 mg/kg/day) or MMF (2–3 g/day) for 6 months. Good responders were shifted to azathioprine for maintenance. The primary outcome was the rate of complete renal response (CR) at 6 months and the secondary outcomes included partial renal response, renal flares and decline of renal function over time.Results150 patients (92% women; aged 35.5±12.8 years; 81% class III/IV) were randomised (76 MMF, 74 TAC). At month 6, the rate of CR was 59% in the MMF and 62% in the TAC group (treatment difference: 3.0% (−12%, 18%); p=0.71). Major infective episodes occurred in 9.2% patients treated with MMF and in 5.4% patients treated with TAC (p=0.53). Maintenance therapy with azathioprine was given to 79% patients. After 60.8±26 months, proteinuric and nephritic renal flares developed in 24% and 18% of patients in the MMF group and 35% (p=0.12) and 27% (p=0.21) in the TAC group, respectively. The cumulative incidence of a composite outcome of decline of creatinine clearance by ≥30%, development of chronic kidney disease stage 4/5 or death was 21% in the MMF and 22% in the TAC group of patients (p=0.35).ConclusionsTAC is non-inferior to MMF, when combined with prednisolone, for induction therapy of active LN. With azathioprine maintenance for 5 years, a non-significant trend of higher incidence of renal flares and renal function decline is observed with the TAC regimen.Trial registration numberHospital Authority Research Ethics Committee Clinical Trial Registry (HARECCTR0500018; Hong Kong) and US ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00371319).

In this double-blind trial, patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive the nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone or placebo. Treatment with finerenone resulted in lower risks of chronic kidney disease outcomes and cardiovascular outcomes than placebo.

The effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease who are at risk for disease progression are not well understood. The EMPA-KIDNEY trial was designed to assess the effects of treatment with empagliflozin in a broad range of such patients. We enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20 but less than 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m of body-surface area, or who had an eGFR of at least 45 but less than 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 200. Patients were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of progression of kidney disease (defined as end-stage kidney disease, a sustained decrease in eGFR to <10 ml per minute per 1.73 m , a sustained decrease in eGFR of ≥40% from baseline, or death from renal causes) or death from cardiovascular causes. A total of 6609 patients underwent randomization. During a median of 2.0 years of follow-up, progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 of 3304 patients (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and in 558 of 3305 patients (16.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.82; P<0.001). Results were consistent among patients with or without diabetes and across subgroups defined according to eGFR ranges. The rate of hospitalization from any cause was lower in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P = 0.003), but there were no significant between-group differences with respect to the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes (which occurred in 4.0% in the empagliflozin group and 4.6% in the placebo group) or death from any cause (in 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Among a wide range of patients with chronic kidney disease who were at risk for disease progression, empagliflozin therapy led to a lower risk of progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and others; EMPA-KIDNEY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03594110; EudraCT number, 2017-002971-24.).

BackgroundThe leading cause of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in children is congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). However, the most appropriate parameters of biochemical urine analysis for detecting CAKUT with kidney dysfunction are not known.MethodsThe present observational study analyzed data on children with CAKUT (stage 2–4 CKD) and the general pediatric population obtained from school urine screenings. The sensitivity and specificity of urine alpha 1-microglobulin-, beta 2-microglobulin-, protein-, and the albumin-to-creatinine ratios (AMCR, BMCR, PCR, ACR, respectively) in detecting CAKUT with kidney dysfunction were compared with those of the conventional urine dipstick, and the most appropriate of these four parameters were evaluated.ResultsIn total, 77 children with CAKUT and 1712 subjects in the general pediatric population fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Conventional dipstick urinalysis was insufficient due to its low sensitivity; even when the threshold of proteinuria was +/−, its sensitivity was only 29.7% for stage 2 and 44.1% for stage 3 CKD. Among the four parameters assessed, the AMCR and BMCR were adequate for detecting CAKUT in children with stage 3–4 CKD (the respective sensitivity and specificity of the AMCR for detecting CAKUT in stage 3 CKD was 79.4% and 97.5% while that of BMCR was 82.4% and 97.5%). These data were validated using national cohort data.ConclusionAMCR and BMCR are superior to dipstick urinalysis, PCR, and ACR in detecting CAKUT with kidney dysfunction, particularly stage 3 CKD. However, for AMCR, external validation is required.A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information