MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit
Journal Article

Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit

2010
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectivesTo examine the use of endoscopy in the UK for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) and compare with published standards.To assess the organisation of endoscopy services for AUGIB in the UK.To examine the relationship between outcomes and out of hours (OOH) service provision.DesignMulti-centre cross sectional clinical audit.SettingAll UK hospitals accepting admissions with AUGIB.PatientsAll adults (≥16 yrs) presenting with AUGIB between 1st May and 30th June 2007.Data CollectionA custom designed web-based reporting tool was used to collect data on patient characteristics, comorbidity and haemodynamic status at presentation to calculate the Rockall score, use and timing of endoscopy, treatment including endoscopic, rebleeding and in-hospital mortality. A mailed questionnaire was used to collect data on facilities and service organisation.ResultsData on 6750 patients (median age 68 years) were analysed from 208 hospitals. 74% underwent inpatient endoscopy; of these 50% took place within 24 h of presentation, 82% during normal working hours and 3% between midnight and 8 am. Of patients deemed high-risk (pre-endoscopy Rockall score ≥5) only 55% were endoscoped within 24 h and 14% waited ≥72 h for endoscopy. Lesions with a high risk of rebleeding were present in 28% of patients of whom 74% received endoscopic therapy. Further bleeding was evident in 13% and mortality in those endoscoped was 7.4% (95% CI 6.7% to 8.1%). In 52% of hospitals a consultant led out of hours (OOH) endoscopy rota existed; in these hospitals 20% of first endoscopies were performed OOH compared with 13% in those with no OOH rota and endoscopic therapy was more likely to be administered (25% vs 21% in hospitals with no OOH rota). The risk adjusted mortality ratio was higher (1.21, p=0.10, (95%CI 0.96 to 1.51)) in hospitals without such rotas.ConclusionsThis audit has found continuing delays in performing endoscopy after AUGIB and underutilisation of standard endoscopic therapy particularly for variceal bleeding. In hospitals with a formal OOH endoscopy rota patients received earlier endoscopy, were more likely to receive endoscopic therapy and may have a lower mortality.