Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Property Law Old and New: The Beneficial Interest Under a Trust
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Property Law Old and New: The Beneficial Interest Under a Trust
Do you wish to request the book?
Property Law Old and New: The Beneficial Interest Under a Trust
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Property Law Old and New: The Beneficial Interest Under a Trust
2025
Overview
Understanding the nature of the rights held by the beneficiary of a trust has been far from straightforward. The prevailing orthodox position in English law is that the beneficiary has an equitable proprietary right in rem with title to the trust property conceptually split between the trustee’s legal title and the beneficiary’s equitable title. It is this conceptual duality between legal and equitable title to the trust property that has been most objectionable to lawyers of the civilian tradition. However, the position of the beneficiary in English law is in fact much more nuanced and contested. The debate has been reinvigorated in recent years by scholars arguing that the beneficiary’s right is not proprietary, he simply has a right against the trustee’s right to the trust property. Responses to this theory reveal that we remain at somewhat of an impasse. Building on recent work by David Foster, this article seeks to move the modern debate on by considering the nature of the beneficiary’s interest in its proper historical context. By placing the debate on the nature of the English trust on firmer historical foundations, the English trust can be seen to be a deeply practical device with a dual contractual and proprietary nature, which in turn better informs common lawyers, civilians and comparativists on the nature of trusts and trust-like devices.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
