Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Sensitizations to aeroallergens in Israel: Prevalences and profiles
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Sensitizations to aeroallergens in Israel: Prevalences and profiles
Do you wish to request the book?
Sensitizations to aeroallergens in Israel: Prevalences and profiles
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Sensitizations to aeroallergens in Israel: Prevalences and profiles
2025
Overview
Background: Most of the literature on aeroallergen sensitization have been generated in North America and Western Europe. Objectives: To determine aeroallergen sensitization prevalences and patterns among patients with physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) in Israel. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study of sensitization to 20 aeroallergen extracts in skin prick tests (SPTs) among consecutive pediatric and adult patients with AR attending the allergy clinic at Emek Medical Center (Afula, Israel) and an affiliated regional outpatient clinic (Nazareth, Israel) from 2021 to 2023. Results: A total of 1993 patients (547 females, 27.4%) were included (median [range] age: 24 [6–82]). The five allergens or groups of allergens with the highest SPT positivity rates were house dust mite (HDM: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae; 74.8%), tree pollens (44.3%), olive pollen (34.1%), grass pollens (25.6%), and cat dander (22.6%). Of the 1993 patients, 947 (47.5%) had a positive SPT for just one of the 20 tested extracts. Patients sensitized to cat dander were significantly (12-fold) more likely to be sensitized to dog dander and vice versa. Patients living in an urban environment were more likely to be sensitized to cypress pollen (19.3% vs. 12.0% in a nonurban environment; p = 0.002, chi-squared test) and pellitory pollen (21.6% vs. 15.1%, respectively; p = 0.010, chi-squared test). Our suggestion is that in the Middle East, patients with symptoms of AR can be effectively screened with a standard “European” panel of allergen extracts for SPTs (such as that suggested by the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network [GA2LEN] organization), plus Johnson grass, Bermuda grass, and oak and eucalyptus pollen extracts.
Subject
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Animals
/ Cats
/ Child
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Rhinitis, Allergic - epidemiology
