Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students’ Competence
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students’ Competence
Do you wish to request the book?
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students’ Competence
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire on students’ Competence
2025
Overview
Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the field of health science and medical education, but less is known about the students´ competencies related to knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the application of AI tools like ChatGPT. Therefore, a unicentric questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was applied to students in the medical field (
= 207). The data revealed that while most students were familiar with ChatGPT (66.7%), other AI tools were significantly less known or utilised for study purposes. Students approached AI tools rather informally, often preferring to use them as a simple search engine. More than half of the students admitted that they were not sufficiently informed about the underlying technology of AI. They applied ChatGPT in a self-directed manner but expressed considerable uncertainty regarding effective prompt engineering and ChatGPT's legal implications. Overall, the majority of respondents showed interest in and positivity towards the introduction of AI. However, they did not feel adequately prepared to handle AI confidently, leading many to express interest in further training. This training should be directly related to students' professional roles, e.g. as a physician. The three most favoured AI-topics for voluntary learning formats were AI in their studies (62.5%), AI in general (58.0%), and the use of AI in scientific writing (57.0%). Notable subgroup differences related to the students\" gender or self-assessed study performance were observed and should be considered in future research.
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd,Taylor & Francis,Taylor & Francis Group
Subject
