Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations
Do you wish to request the book?
Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations
2022
Overview
The reluctance of people to get vaccinated represents a fundamental challenge to containing the spread of deadly infectious diseases
1
,
2
, including COVID-19. Identifying misperceptions that can fuel vaccine hesitancy and creating effective communication strategies to overcome them are a global public health priority
3
–
5
. Medical doctors are a trusted source of advice about vaccinations
6
, but media reports may create an inaccurate impression that vaccine controversy is prevalent among doctors, even when a broad consensus exists
7
,
8
. Here we show that public misperceptions about the views of doctors on the COVID-19 vaccines are widespread, and correcting them increases vaccine uptake. We implement a survey among 9,650 doctors in the Czech Republic and find that 90% of doctors trust the vaccines. Next, we show that 90% of respondents in a nationally representative sample (
n
= 2,101) underestimate doctors’ trust; the most common belief is that only 50% of doctors trust the vaccines. Finally, we integrate randomized provision of information about the true views held by doctors into a longitudinal data collection that regularly monitors vaccination status over 9 months. The treatment recalibrates beliefs and leads to a persistent increase in vaccine uptake. The approach demonstrated in this paper shows how the engagement of professional medical associations, with their unparalleled capacity to elicit individual views of doctors on a large scale, can help to create a cheap, scalable intervention that has lasting positive impacts on health behaviour.
Correcting public misperceptions about the views of doctors on the COVID-19 vaccines can have lasting impacts on public uptake of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK
