Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Predictors of adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a prospective analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Predictors of adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a prospective analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Predictors of adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a prospective analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Predictors of adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a prospective analysis
2021
Overview
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) often has low adherence rates.
To provide effective support for SLIT continuation, we investigated potential predictors of SLIT adherence through a prospective analysis of patient characteristics. We excluded evaluation of treatment effect and symptoms during treatment, aiming instead to identify predictors of later dropout or insufficient adherence due to indolence or forgetfulness using only information obtained at initial examination.
We provided patients with a questionnaire and monitored self-reported adherence once every 6 months. Cases of dropout for clear reasons were excluded, but cases of dropout or insufficient adherence to SLIT for indolence or forgetfulness were included.
Fifty-three patients receiving SLIT were assessed. Nine patients dropped out after providing a clear reason. Thirty-four patients maintained good adherence. Seven patients continued SLIT but with insufficient adherence, while three patients discontinued SLIT for unclear reasons (indolence or forgetfulness) and these ten individuals were classified as the poor-adherence group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis of the good-adherence and poor-adherence groups showed age to be a significant predictor of SLIT adherence. Based on analysis of a receiver operating characteristic curve, age < 40.5 years was selected as the optimal cutoff value for predicting poor adherence to SLIT.
To prevent treatment SLIT discontinuation on account of indolence or forgetfulness, the necessity of longterm treatment continuity should be communicated clearly prior to commencing treatment, especially for patients under 40 years of age.
Publisher
The Allergy and Immunology Society
