Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised
2017
Overview
This article presents the findings of a re-evaluation of all 5,200 aid projects that OECD donors reported for 2012 as \"climate change adaptation\"-related, based on the \"Rio marker\" classification system. The findings confirm those from the academic and grey literature that the absence of independent quality control makes the adaptation Rio marker data almost entirely unreliable. This lack of credibility impedes meaningful assessments of progress toward the mainstreaming of adaptation in development cooperation activities. It also erodes trust in international climate negotiations, given that these data are frequently used in the financial reporting of developed countries to the UNFCCC.
Publisher
Routledge,Taylor & Francis, Ltd,Taylor & Francis Ltd
