Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Multi-detector row CT scanning in Paleoanthropology at various tube current settings and scanning mode
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Multi-detector row CT scanning in Paleoanthropology at various tube current settings and scanning mode
Do you wish to request the book?
Multi-detector row CT scanning in Paleoanthropology at various tube current settings and scanning mode
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Multi-detector row CT scanning in Paleoanthropology at various tube current settings and scanning mode
2005
Overview
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal tube current setting and scanning mode for hominid fossil skull scanning, using multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). Four fossil skulls (La Ferrassie 1, Abri Pataud 1, CroMagnon 2 and Cro-Magnon 3) were examined by using the CT scanner LightSpeed 16 (General Electric Medical Systems) with varying dose per section (160, 250, and 300 mAs) and scanning mode (helical and conventional). Image quality of two-dimensional (2D) multiplanar reconstructions, three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions and native images was assessed by four reviewers using a four-point grading scale. An ANOVA (analysis of variance) model was used to compare the mean score for each sequence and the overall mean score according to the levels of the scanning parameters. Compared with helical CT (mean score=12.03), the conventional technique showed sustained poor image quality (mean score=4.17). With the helical mode, we observed a better image quality at 300 mAs than at 160 in the 3D sequences (P=0.03). Whereas in native images, a reduction in the effective tube current induced no degradation in image quality (P=0.05). Our study suggests a standardized protocol for fossil scanning with a 16 x 0.625 detector configuration, a 10 mm beam collimation, a 0.562:1 acquisition mode, a 0.625/0.4 mm slice thickness/reconstruction interval, a pitch of 5.62, 120 kV and 300 mAs especially when a 3D study is required.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Nature B.V,Springer Verlag (Germany)
Subject
/ Animals
/ Biochemistry, Molecular Biology
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ Female
/ Fossils
/ Head
/ Humanities and Social Sciences
/ Humans
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
/ Male
/ Radiographic Image Enhancement
/ Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
/ Skull
