Journal Article

Classification of Cochrane Plain Language Summaries by Conclusiveness Using Transformer-Based Models and ChatGPT: Retrospective Observational Study

Mijatović, Antonija, Ćaćić, Barbara, Buljan, Ivan, Bralić, Nensi, Ursić, Luka, Bandić, Ružica, Marušić, Ana

2026

Overview

Cochrane plain language summaries (PLSs) aim to make systematic review findings more accessible to the general public. However, inconsistencies in how conclusions are presented may impact comprehension and decision-making. Classifying PLSs based on conclusiveness can improve clarity and facilitate informed health decisions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate deep learning language models for the classification of PLSs according to 3 levels of conclusiveness (conclusive, inconclusive, and unclear) and to compare their performance with a general-purpose large language model (GPT-4o). We used a publicly available dataset containing 4405 Cochrane PLSs of systematic reviews published until 2019, already classified by humans according to 9 categories of conclusiveness regarding the intervention's effectiveness or safety. We merged these categories into 3 classes based on the strength of conclusiveness: conclusive, inconclusive, and unclear. For the fine-tuning, we used Scientific Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (SciBERT), a pretrained language model trained on 1.14 million papers primarily from the health sciences, and Longformer, a transformer model designed specifically to process long documents. The script was developed using the Python programming language and the PyTorch framework. We computed evaluation metrics using the scikit-learn machine learning library and determined the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) to measure the model performance in balancing sensitivity and specificity. We also analyzed a separate set of 213 PLSs and compared the predictions of our pretrained models with both manual verification and outputs generated by ChatGPT. The model based on SciBERT achieved a balanced accuracy of 56.6%. The AUCROC was 0.91 for \"conclusive,\" 0.67 for \"inconclusive,\" and 0.75 for \"unclear\" conclusiveness classes. The Longformer-based model had a balanced accuracy of 60.9%, with AUCROCs of 0.86 for \"conclusive,\" 0.67 for \"inconclusive,\" and 0.72 for \"unclear\" conclusiveness classes. Both models underperformed compared with ChatGPT, which demonstrated higher accuracy (74.2%), better precision and recall, and a higher Cohen κ (0.57). Fine-tuning 2 transformer-based language models showed mixed results in classifying Cochrane PLSs by conclusiveness, likely due to semantic overlap and subtle linguistic differences. Despite satisfactory internal test metrics, the fine-tuned models failed to generalize to newly published PLSs, where performance dropped to near-chance levels. These findings suggest that general-purpose large language models like GPT-4o may currently offer more reliable results for practical classification tasks in biomedical applications.

• Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc,JMIR Publications
• Subject: AI Language Models in Health Care / Artificial Intelligence / Deep Learning / Generative Artificial Intelligence / Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT / Humans / Language / Language Translation Technologies for Medicine and Public Health / Natural Language Processing / Original Paper / Plain Language Summaries / Retrospective Studies / Systematic Reviews as Topic / Tools, Programs and Algorithms