Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Impact of Government and Public Dual-Subject Environmental Concerns on Urban Haze Pollution: An Empirical Research on 279 Cities in China
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Impact of Government and Public Dual-Subject Environmental Concerns on Urban Haze Pollution: An Empirical Research on 279 Cities in China
Do you wish to request the book?
The Impact of Government and Public Dual-Subject Environmental Concerns on Urban Haze Pollution: An Empirical Research on 279 Cities in China
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Impact of Government and Public Dual-Subject Environmental Concerns on Urban Haze Pollution: An Empirical Research on 279 Cities in China
2022
Overview
Based on 279 cities in China from 2011 to 2019 as research samples, this study used a fixed-effect regression model to investigate the influence of government and public dual-subject environmental concerns on urban haze pollution. The results show that: (1) Government and public environmental concerns have a significant negative impact on urban haze pollution. The results are still valid after a series of robustness tests and controlling for endogenous problems. (2) Further research found that dual-subject environmental concerns have a stronger negative effect on urban haze pollution in areas where there is a low level of Internet development and in western regions. (3) Through the test of the intermediary mechanism, it can be seen that the environmental concerns of the government and the public can reduce haze pollution by reducing policy uncertainty and capital element misallocation. In general, the policy effect is greater than the capital allocation effect. The research conclusions of this study will help to deepen the interpretation of the role of the government and the public in environmental governance and also provide a reference for cities to further promote haze governance.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
