Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Streamflow Permanence Classification Model for Forested Streams That Explicitly Accounts for Uncertainty and Extrapolation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Streamflow Permanence Classification Model for Forested Streams That Explicitly Accounts for Uncertainty and Extrapolation
Do you wish to request the book?
A Streamflow Permanence Classification Model for Forested Streams That Explicitly Accounts for Uncertainty and Extrapolation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Streamflow Permanence Classification Model for Forested Streams That Explicitly Accounts for Uncertainty and Extrapolation
2025
Overview
Accurate mapping of headwater streams and their flow status has important implications for understanding and managing water resources and land uses. However, accurate information is rare, especially in rugged, forested terrain. We developed a streamflow permanence classification model for forested lands in western Oregon using the latest light detection and ranging‐derived hydrography published in the National Hydrography Dataset. Models were trained using 2,518 flow/no flow field observations collected in late summer 2019–2021 across headwaters of 129 sub‐watersheds. The final model, the Western Oregon WeT DRy model, used Random Forest and 13 environmental covariates for classifying every 5‐m stream sub‐reach across 426 sub‐watersheds. The most important covariates were annual precipitation and drainage area. Model output included probabilities of late summer surface flow presence and were subsequently categorized into three streamflow permanence classes—Wet, Dry, and Ambiguous. Ambiguous denoted model probabilities and associated prediction intervals that extended over the 50% classification threshold between wet and dry. Model accuracy was 0.83 for sub‐watersheds that contained training data and decreased to 0.67 for sub‐watersheds that did not have observations of late summer surface flow. The model identified where predictions extrapolated beyond the domain characterized by the training data. The combination of spatially continuous estimates of late summer streamflow status along with uncertainty and extrapolation estimates provide critical information for strategic project planning and designing additional field data collection.
