Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Influence of Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies on Thyroglobulin Levels Measured by Different Methodologies: IMA, LC-MS/MS, and RIA
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Influence of Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies on Thyroglobulin Levels Measured by Different Methodologies: IMA, LC-MS/MS, and RIA
Do you wish to request the book?
Influence of Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies on Thyroglobulin Levels Measured by Different Methodologies: IMA, LC-MS/MS, and RIA
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Influence of Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies on Thyroglobulin Levels Measured by Different Methodologies: IMA, LC-MS/MS, and RIA
2024
Overview
Abstract
Context
Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) measured by immunometric assay (IMA) is prone to underestimation due to Tg autoantibody (TgAb) interference, often prompting reflex Tg measurement by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (MS) or radioimmunoassay (RIA).
Objective
IMA, MS, and RIA methodologies were used to measure serum Tg in TgAb-negative (TgAb−) and TgAb-positive (TgAb+) patients with either distant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) or hyperthyroidism (HY)—patients in whom a detectable serum Tg would be expected.
Results
When TgAb was absent, all methodologies detected Tg in the sera of all DTC and HY patients and reported appropriate Tg trends and treatment responses for DTC patients with progressive distant metastatic disease, albeit with high between-method variability (> 30% coefficient of variability). When TgAb was present, all methodologies reported lower serum Tg levels for both DTC and HY groups vs their respective TgAb− group. No Tg was detected by IMA or MS in ∼50% TgAb+ DTC patients (6% had no Tg detected by RIA). Surprisingly, 5% of TgAb+ HY patients also had no Tg detected by IMA or MS. The inverse log TgAb/log Tg correlations seen for the TgAb+ HY patient group with all methods suggested the presence of a TgAb-associated serum Tg-lowering effect.
Conclusion
(i) Between-method Tg variability necessitates method continuity when monitoring the Tg trends of TgAb− DTC patients. (ii) The presence and concentration of TgAb appeared to have a lowering effect on serum Tg measured by all methodologies (IMA, MS, and RIA). (iii) Since the reliability of Tg measured in the presence of TgAb is often uncertain, the TgAb trend (measured by the same method) may be a useful surrogate DTC tumor marker.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
