Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The influence of the long-term chemical activation of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) on liver carcinogenesis in mice
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The influence of the long-term chemical activation of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) on liver carcinogenesis in mice
Do you wish to request the book?
The influence of the long-term chemical activation of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) on liver carcinogenesis in mice
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The influence of the long-term chemical activation of the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) on liver carcinogenesis in mice
2021
Overview
Pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) are nuclear receptors that are highly expressed in the liver and activated by numerous chemicals. While CAR activation by its activators, such as phenobarbital (PB), induces hepatocyte proliferation and liver carcinogenesis in rodents, it remains unclear whether PXR activation drives liver cancer. To investigate the influence of PXR activation on liver carcinogenesis, we treated mice with the PXR activator pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile (PCN) with or without PB following tumor initiation with diethylnitrosamine (DEN). After 20 weeks of treatment, preneoplastic lesions detected by immunostaining with an anti-KRT8/18 antibody were observed in PB-treated but not PCN-treated mice, and PCN cotreatment augmented the formation of preneoplastic lesions by PB. After 35 weeks of treatment, macroscopic observations indicated that PB-treated and PB/PCN-cotreated mice had increased numbers of liver tumors compared to control and PCN-treated mice. In the pathological analyses of liver sections, all the mice in the PB and PB/PCN groups developed carcinoma and/or eosinophilic adenoma, but in the PB/PCN group, the multiplicity of carcinoma and eosinophilic adenoma was significantly reduced and the size of carcinoma showed a tendency to decrease. No mouse in the control or PCN-treated group developed such tumors. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) and gene set enrichment analyses in combination with RNA sequencing suggested the increased expression of genes related to epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in mice cotreated with PCN and PB compared to those treated with PB alone. Changes in the hepatic mRNA levels of epithelial marker genes supported the results of the transcriptome analyses. In conclusion, the present results suggest that PXR activation does not promote hepatocarcinogenesis in contrast to CAR and rather attenuates CAR-mediated liver cancer development by suppressing the EMT of liver cancer cells in rodents.
