MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features
Journal Article

Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features

2019
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveTo differentiate brain pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) from glioblastoma (GBM) using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantitative radiomic features by a decision tree model.MethodsSixty-six patients from two centres (PA, n = 31; GBM, n = 35) were randomly divided into training and validation data sets (about 2:1). Quantitative radiomic features of the tumours were extracted from contrast-enhanced MR images. A subset of features was selected by feature stability and Boruta algorithm. The selected features were used to build a decision tree model. Predictive accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess model performance. The classification outcome of the model was combined with tumour location, age and gender features, and multivariable logistic regression analysis and permutation test using the entire data set were performed to further evaluate the decision tree model.ResultsA total of 271 radiomic features were successfully extracted for each tumour. Twelve features were selected as input variables to build the decision tree model. Two features S(1, -1) Entropy and S(2, -2) SumAverg were finally included in the model. The model showed an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.87, 0.90 and 0.83 for the training data set and 0.86, 0.80 and 0.91 for the validation data set. The classification outcome of the model related to the actual tumour types and did not rely on the other three features (p < 0.001).ConclusionsA decision tree model with two features derived from the contrast-enhanced MR images performed well in differentiating PA from GBM.Key Points• MRI findings of PA and GBM are sometimes very similar.• Radiomics provides much more quantitative information about tumours.• Radiomic features can help to distinguish PA from GBM.