Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE: DIMENSIONS OF VULNERABILITY AND FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS' EXIT FROM WAR-AFFLICTED COUNTRIES
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE: DIMENSIONS OF VULNERABILITY AND FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS' EXIT FROM WAR-AFFLICTED COUNTRIES
Do you wish to request the book?
CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE: DIMENSIONS OF VULNERABILITY AND FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS' EXIT FROM WAR-AFFLICTED COUNTRIES
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE: DIMENSIONS OF VULNERABILITY AND FOREIGN MULTINATIONALS' EXIT FROM WAR-AFFLICTED COUNTRIES
2017
Overview
Research summary: When war occurs in a country, some foreign multinational enterprises (MNEs) stay on, while others flee. We argue that MNE responses to external threats depend on the firm's vulnerability, which we decompose into exposure (proximity to threat), at-risk resources (potential for loss), and resilience (capacity for coping). We test the independent and interactive effects of these dimensions using a geo-referenced sample of 1,162 MNE subsidiaries in 20 war-afflicted countries between 1987 and 2006. We find that highly valuable resources can become liabilities when exposed to harm, and the best way to cope with external threats may be to exit. Our findings extend the resource-based view and real options theory by demonstrating the bounded value of resources and options in the face of environmental contingencies. Managerial summary: A recent survey of multinational enterprise (MNE) executives revealed that 30 percent of the respondents believed that their firms were exposed to collateral damage from war, with more than 90 percent expecting risks to rise. Yet, 25 percent of the executives indicated that their firms had no continuity plan. Our study of MNEs in war-afflicted countries highlights the costs of not having a response strategy in place. We find that, in war zones, otherwise highly valuable locations and resources can become sources of vulnerability that prompt early withdrawal from a host country. Our work further highlights the value of real options thinking—where structural solutions such as building redundancy into a portfolio of options may exist in advance of problems—for navigating hostile environments.
