Journal Article

ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening

Powell, Pippa, Blum, Torsten Gerriet, Bostantzoglou Clementine, Čepická Blanka, Bram, van Ginneken, Morozov Sergey, Baird, Anne-Marie, Hans-Ulrich, Kauczor, Prosch Helmut, Bonomo, Lorenzo, Jespersen Vagn, Rawlinson Janette, Burghuber Otto, Comanescu Alina, Snoeckx Annemiek, Revel Marie-Pierre, Gaga Mina, Peled Nir, van Meerbeeck Jan P, Couraud Sébastien, Ravara Sofia, von Stackelberg Oyunbileg, Agmon Inbar Nardi, Silva, Mario, Devaraj Anand, Vardavas Constantine

2020

Overview

In Europe, lung cancer ranks third among the most common cancers, remaining the biggest killer. Since the publication of the first European Society of Radiology and European Respiratory Society joint white paper on lung cancer screening (LCS) in 2015, many new findings have been published and discussions have increased considerably. Thus, this updated expert opinion represents a narrative, non-systematic review of the evidence from LCS trials and description of the current practice of LCS as well as aspects that have not received adequate attention until now. Reaching out to the potential participants (persons at high risk), optimal communication and shared decision-making will be key starting points. Furthermore, standards for infrastructure, pathways and quality assurance are pivotal, including promoting tobacco cessation, benefits and harms, overdiagnosis, quality, minimum radiation exposure, definition of management of positive screen results and incidental findings linked to respective actions as well as cost-effectiveness. This requires a multidisciplinary team with experts from pulmonology and radiology as well as thoracic oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, family doctors, patient representatives and others. The ESR and ERS agree that Europe’s health systems need to adapt to allow citizens to benefit from organised pathways, rather than unsupervised initiatives, to allow early diagnosis of lung cancer and reduce the mortality rate. Now is the time to set up and conduct demonstration programmes focusing, among other points, on methodology, standardisation, tobacco cessation, education on healthy lifestyle, cost-effectiveness and a central registry.Key Points• Pulmonologists and radiologists both have key roles in the set up of multidisciplinary LCS teams with experts from many other fields.• Pulmonologists identify people eligible for LCS, reach out to family doctors, share the decision-making process and promote tobacco cessation.• Radiologists ensure appropriate image quality, minimum dose and a standardised reading/reporting algorithm, together with a clear definition of a “positive screen”.• Strict algorithms define the exact management of screen-detected nodules and incidental findings.• For LCS to be (cost-)effective, it has to target a population defined by risk prediction models.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Algorithms / Cancer screening / Clinical trials / Cost analysis / Decision making / Demonstration programmes / Image quality / Lung cancer / Medical personnel / Medical screening / Nodules / Physicians / Prediction models / Quality assurance / Radiation / Radiation effects / Radiology / Risk communication / Shared decision making / Thorax / Tobacco