Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of CMIP6 models toward dynamical downscaling over 14 CORDEX domains
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of CMIP6 models toward dynamical downscaling over 14 CORDEX domains
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of CMIP6 models toward dynamical downscaling over 14 CORDEX domains
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluation of CMIP6 models toward dynamical downscaling over 14 CORDEX domains
2024
Overview
Both reliability and independence of global climate model (GCM) simulation are essential for model selection to generate a reasonable uncertainty range of dynamical downscaling simulations. In this study, we evaluate the performance and interdependency of 37 GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) in terms of seven key large-scale driving fields over 14 CORDEX domains. A multivariable integrated evaluation method is used to evaluate and rank the models’ ability to simulate multiple variables in terms of their climatological mean and interannual variability. The results suggest that the model performance varies considerably with seasons, domains, and variables evaluated, and no model outperforms in all aspects. However, the multi-model ensemble mean performs much better than almost all models. Among 37 CMIP6 models, the MPI-ESM1-2-HR and FIO-ESM-2-0 rank top two due to their overall good performance across all domains. To measure the model interdependency in terms of multiple fields, we define the similarity of multivariate error fields between pairwise models. Our results indicate that the dependence exists between most of the CMIP6 models, and the models sharing the same idea or/and concept generally show less independence. Furthermore, we hierarchically cluster the top 15 models with good performance based on the similarity of multivariate error fields to identify relatively independent models. Our evaluation can provide useful guidance on the selection of CMIP6 models based on their performance and relative independence, which helps to generate a more reliable ensemble of dynamical downscaling simulations with reasonable inter-model spread.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
