Journal Article

Growth, Safety and Tolerance in Infants Fed Rice Protein Hydrolysate Formula: The GRITO Randomised Controlled Trial

Nieto-García, Antonio, Mazón, Ángel, Salamouras, Dimitrios, Kalach, Nicolas, Lemoine, Anaïs, Salhi, Hocine, Navas-López, Víctor Manuel, Nieto-Cid, María, Espín-Jaime, Beatriz, de Castellar-Sansó, Roser, Delgado Ojeda, Jesús

2025

Overview

Background: Hydrolysed rice formula (HRF) is tolerated by >90% of children with cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA). However, concerns have been raised about potential suboptimal growth in infants fed HRF compared to those fed an extensively hydrolysed milk protein formula (eHF). Aims: To compare growth, safety and tolerance acquisition in infants with CMPA when fed HRF versus eHF. Methods: A multicentre prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge trial was conducted with infants with CMPA. The infants received either HRF or eHF over a 12-month follow-up period. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline over the study period in weight-for-length expressed as a Z-score. The secondary outcomes were other anthropometric measurements, tolerability and adverse events (AEs). Results: In total, 105 children were enrolled. The weight-for-length measurements were −0.01 (HRF) and −0.29 (eHF) at baseline and 0.29 and 0.05, respectively, at the last visit, with no significant between-group difference (p = 0.28; mixed-effects model). The Z-scores for other anthropometric variables indicated normal growth, with no significant between-group differences. In total, 29 potentially product-related AEs were reported (12 in the HRF group and 17 in the eHF group). A trend was observed toward a faster acquisition of tolerance in the HRF group (median age: 20.4 months) compared to the eHF group (16.3 months), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). Conclusions: HRF demonstrated appropriate growth, acquisition of tolerance and a good safety profile in infants with CMPA, with no significant differences versus eHF. HRF could be considered as an appropriate option in the management of CMPA.

• Publisher: MDPI AG,MDPI
• Subject: Allergic reaction / Allergy / Anaphylaxis / Arsenic / Babies / Baby foods / Child Development / Clinical trials / Double-Blind Method / Families & family life / Female / Food allergies / Growth / Humans / Infant / Infant Formula - adverse effects / Infant Formula - chemistry / Infants / Male / Milk / Milk Hypersensitivity - diet therapy / Milk Hypersensitivity - immunology / Milk proteins / Milk Proteins - adverse effects / Milk Proteins - immunology / Nutrition / Oryza - chemistry / Patients / Pediatrics / Prospective Studies / Protein hydrolysates / Protein Hydrolysates - administration & dosage / Protein Hydrolysates - adverse effects / Proteins / Rice