MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation
Journal Article

A comparison of ultrasound echo intensity to magnetic resonance imaging as a metric for tongue fat evaluation

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Abstract Study Objectives Tongue fat is associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying tongue fat. Ultrasound echo intensity has been shown to correlate to the fat content in skeletal muscles but has yet to be studied in the tongue. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between ultrasound echo intensity and tongue fat. Methods Ultrasound coronal cross-sections of ex-vivo cow tongues were recorded at baseline and following three 1 mL serial injections of fat into the tongue. In humans, adults with and without OSA had submental ultrasound coronal cross-sections of their posterior tongue. The average echo intensity of the tongues (cow/human) was calculated in ImageJ software. Head and neck MRIs were obtained on human subjects to quantify tongue fat volume. Echo intensity was compared to injected fat volume or MRI-derived tongue fat percentage. Results Echo intensity in cow tongues showed a positive correlation to injected fat volume (rho = 0.93, p < .001). In human subjects, echo intensity of the tongue base strongly correlated with MRI-calculated fat percentage for both the posterior tongue (rho = 0.95, p < .001) and entire tongue (rho = 0.62, p < .001). Larger tongue fat percentages (rho = 0.38, p = .001) and higher echo intensity (rho = 0.27, p = .024) were associated with more severe apnea-hypopnea index, adjusted for age, body mass index, sex, and race. Conclusions Ultrasound echo intensity is a viable surrogate measure for tongue fat volume and may provide a convenient modality to characterize tongue fat in OSA.