Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
“I too call myself I”: Madhavikutty-Kamala Das and the Intransitive Autobiography
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
“I too call myself I”: Madhavikutty-Kamala Das and the Intransitive Autobiography
Do you wish to request the book?
“I too call myself I”: Madhavikutty-Kamala Das and the Intransitive Autobiography
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
“I too call myself I”: Madhavikutty-Kamala Das and the Intransitive Autobiography
2018
Overview
This paper scrutinizes some of our most enduring assumptions about the genre of autobiography. More particularly, it examines the predicative links, the transitivities, which bind
notions of self-life-and-writing. It comes to this exercise through a reading of Madhavikutty-Kamala Das’ Balyakala Smaranakal (Memories of a Childhood) (1987).
This autobiography promises to trace the self from its incipience—only to side-step the self’s emergence and to hide this deferral in plain sight. The paper argues that
Balyakala Smaranakal (BS) uses our expectations of the genre and our presumptions about the writer—particularly her abiding preoccupation with
self-production—as accomplices. It invites us to witness the textual densities which the child-protagonist gathers and then deploys these strategies to un-do the self’s emergence.
By deferring the production of the self BS stages the autobiography as “intransitive”. This paper goes some way in examining the reasons why it becomes impossible for BS to produce
a legible self; for the child-protagonist to step into the social category that it summons forth. It examines the formal as well as socio-historical conditions within which this
autobiography becomes the place of self-postponement—rather than of self-presentation and self-actualization.
