Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Selection bias due to delayed comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Selection bias due to delayed comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan
Do you wish to request the book?
Selection bias due to delayed comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Selection bias due to delayed comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan
2023
Overview
Patients with advanced cancer undergo comprehensive genomic profiling in Japan only after treatment options have been exhausted. Patients with a very poor prognosis were not able to undergo profiling tests, resulting in a selection bias called length bias, which makes accurate survival analysis impossible. The actual impact of length bias on the overall survival of patients who have undergone profiling tests is unclear, yet appropriate methods for adjusting for length bias have not been developed. To assess the length bias in overall survival, we established a simulation‐based model for length bias adjustment. This study utilized clinicogenomic data of 8813 patients with advanced cancer who underwent profiling tests at hospitals throughout Japan between June 2019 and April 2022. Length bias was estimated by the conditional Kendall τ statistics and was significantly positive for 13 of the 15 cancer subtypes, suggesting a worse prognosis for patients who underwent profiling tests in early timing. The median overall survival time in colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancer from the initial survival‐prolonging chemotherapy with adjustment for length bias was 937 (886–991), 1225 (1152–1368), and 585 (553–617) days, respectively (median; 95% credible interval). Adjusting for length bias made it possible to analyze the prognostic relevance of oncogenic mutations and treatments. In total, 12 tumor‐specific oncogenic mutations correlating with poor survival were detected after adjustment. There was no difference in survival between FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine with nab‐paclitaxel‐treated groups as first‐line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Adjusting for length bias is an essential part of utilizing real‐world clinicogenomic data.
Length bias due to delayed enrollment in comprehensive genomic profiling tests makes accurate survival analysis impossible. This study enrolling 8813 Japanese patients with advanced cancer who underwent a profiling test showed a worse prognosis for patients who underwent profiling tests in early timing. Our adjusting method for length bias made it possible to analyze overall survival and the prognostic impact of oncogenic mutations and treatments.
