MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study
Journal Article

Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods This retrospective study included 72 eyes from 72 patients with chronic CSC treated with either one-third-dose (2 mg/m²) or half-dose (3 mg/m²) PDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), subretinal fluid (SRF) thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to guide laser application. Treatment outcomes, including SRF resolution, BCVA gain, and recurrence rates, were compared between the two groups. Results At 12 months, complete SRF resolution was achieved in 40 eyes (78.4%) in the half-dose group and 15 eyes (71.4%) in the one-third-dose group. The recurrence rate of SRF was significantly higher in the one-third-dose group (20%) compared to the half-dose group (7.5%) ( P  =.015). BCVA improved significantly in both groups, with mean increases from 72.4 ± 3.9 to 77.1 ± 5.6 letters in the one-third-dose group and from 74.4 ± 4.2 to 80.2 ± 2.19 letters in the half-dose group. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 10-letter gain was higher in the half-dose group (52%) compared to the one-third-dose group (28.5%, P  =.001). Both groups exhibited significant reductions in CRT, SRF thickness, and SFCT ( P  <.001), with no significant intergroup differences. Baseline CRT and fluorescein leakage patterns influenced treatment response. Conclusions Both one-third-dose and half-dose PDT effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with chronic CSC. However, half-dose PDT demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving SRF resolution and greater visual acuity gains with a lower recurrence rate. Clinical trial number Not applicable.