Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluation of two treatment concepts of four implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: finite element analysis
2023
Overview
Background
Currently, oblique placement of long implants or the use of short implants to circumvent the maxillary sinus area and provide support for fixed prostheses are viable alternatives. The purpose of this study was to compare these two treatment concepts and ascertain which one exhibits superior biomechanical characteristics.
Methods
Two different treatment concept models were constructed. The first one, LT4I, consisting of two mesial vertical implants positioned in lateral incisor regions and two distal tilted implants (45°) situated in second premolar regions of the maxilla. The second model, VS4I, includes two mesial vertical implants in lateral incisor regions and two vertically positioned short implants in second premolar regions. Numerical simulations were conducted under three loading types: firstly, oblique forces upon the molars; secondly, vertical forces upon the molars; thirdly, oblique forces upon the incisors. The maximum principal stress (σ
max
) and minimum principal stress (σ
min
) of the bone, as well as von Mises stress of the implants, were calcuated.
Results
Under oblique loading on the molar, higher stress values in the bone were observed in LT4I group. Under vertical loading on molar, higher stress values in the bone were also observed in LT4I group. Furthermore, little difference was found between the two groups under oblique loading on the incisor.
Conclusion
Both treatment concepts can be applicable for edentulous individuals with moderate atrophic maxilla. Compared to tilted implants, short implants can transmit less occlusal force to the supporting tissues.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
