Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989–2008
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989–2008
Do you wish to request the book?
Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989–2008
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989–2008
2014
Overview
Summary
The incidence of the most common fracture types in Iceland is reported based on individual data from the Reykjavik Study 1967–2008. Time trend is reported for the major osteoporotic fractures (MOS) 1989–2008.
Introduction
This study aims to assess the incidence of all fractures in Iceland, with emphasis on the rate of hip fractures, and compare the incidence with other populations as well as examine the secular changes.
Methods
Individuals from the prospective population-based cohort Reykjavik Study were examined between 1967 and 2008 (follow-up 26.5 years), which consisted of 9,116 men and 9,756 women born in 1907–1935, with age range 31–81 years. First fracture incidence was estimated using life table methods with age as the timescale.
Results
Fracture rate increased proportionally with age between the sexes for vertebral and proximal humerus but disproportionally for hip and distal forearm fractures. The ratio of first fracture incidence between the sexes varied considerably by site: 2.65 for hip fractures and the highest for distal forearm fractures at 4.83. By the age of 75, 36.7 % of women and 21 % of men had sustained a fracture, taking into account competing risk of death. The incidence of hip fractures was similar to results previously published from USA, Sweden, Norway, and Scotland. The incidence of MOS fractures in both sexes decreased over the last decade, except hip fractures in men, which remained unchanged, as reflected in the women/men ratio for the hip, which changed from 2.6 to 1.7.
Conclusion
This study adds information to scarce knowledge on the relative fracture incidence of different fractures. The incidence of MOS fractures increased in the latter part of the last century in both sexes and declined during the last decade, less dramatically for men. This information is important for planning health resources.
Publisher
Springer London,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
