Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
by
Zhou, Shikai
, Chen, Zhiwen
, Wei, Ling
, Deng, Chunyan
, Liu, Yang
, Zheng, Yiming
, Hu, Xiaofei
, Zheng, Ji
, Zhou, Zhansong
, Liu, Zhicheng
, Duan, Guangjie
, Yang, Mengjun
, Yang, Nengrui
, Tan, Qi
, Li, Xuemei
in
Antegrade
/ Biopsy
/ Blood
/ Cancer
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Complications
/ Continuity (mathematics)
/ Diseases
/ Dissection
/ Genital cancers
/ Humans
/ Inguinal lymphadenectomy
/ Internal Medicine
/ Invasiveness
/ Laparoscopic surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparoscopy - methods
/ Lymph Node Excision - methods
/ Lymph nodes
/ Lymphatic system
/ Lymphedema
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Metastasis
/ Morbidity
/ Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
/ Oncology, Experimental
/ Patients
/ Penile cancer
/ Penile Neoplasms - surgery
/ Penis
/ Postoperative
/ Relapse
/ Research Article
/ Retrospective Studies
/ Robotic surgery
/ Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
/ Robotic-assisted surgery
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Variables
/ Visceral and general surgery
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
by
Zhou, Shikai
, Chen, Zhiwen
, Wei, Ling
, Deng, Chunyan
, Liu, Yang
, Zheng, Yiming
, Hu, Xiaofei
, Zheng, Ji
, Zhou, Zhansong
, Liu, Zhicheng
, Duan, Guangjie
, Yang, Mengjun
, Yang, Nengrui
, Tan, Qi
, Li, Xuemei
in
Antegrade
/ Biopsy
/ Blood
/ Cancer
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Complications
/ Continuity (mathematics)
/ Diseases
/ Dissection
/ Genital cancers
/ Humans
/ Inguinal lymphadenectomy
/ Internal Medicine
/ Invasiveness
/ Laparoscopic surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparoscopy - methods
/ Lymph Node Excision - methods
/ Lymph nodes
/ Lymphatic system
/ Lymphedema
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Metastasis
/ Morbidity
/ Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
/ Oncology, Experimental
/ Patients
/ Penile cancer
/ Penile Neoplasms - surgery
/ Penis
/ Postoperative
/ Relapse
/ Research Article
/ Retrospective Studies
/ Robotic surgery
/ Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
/ Robotic-assisted surgery
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Variables
/ Visceral and general surgery
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
by
Zhou, Shikai
, Chen, Zhiwen
, Wei, Ling
, Deng, Chunyan
, Liu, Yang
, Zheng, Yiming
, Hu, Xiaofei
, Zheng, Ji
, Zhou, Zhansong
, Liu, Zhicheng
, Duan, Guangjie
, Yang, Mengjun
, Yang, Nengrui
, Tan, Qi
, Li, Xuemei
in
Antegrade
/ Biopsy
/ Blood
/ Cancer
/ Clinical outcomes
/ Comparative analysis
/ Comparative studies
/ Complications
/ Continuity (mathematics)
/ Diseases
/ Dissection
/ Genital cancers
/ Humans
/ Inguinal lymphadenectomy
/ Internal Medicine
/ Invasiveness
/ Laparoscopic surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Laparoscopy - methods
/ Lymph Node Excision - methods
/ Lymph nodes
/ Lymphatic system
/ Lymphedema
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Metastasis
/ Morbidity
/ Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
/ Oncology, Experimental
/ Patients
/ Penile cancer
/ Penile Neoplasms - surgery
/ Penis
/ Postoperative
/ Relapse
/ Research Article
/ Retrospective Studies
/ Robotic surgery
/ Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
/ Robotic-assisted surgery
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Variables
/ Visceral and general surgery
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
Journal Article
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Minimally invasive modifications of inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL), including laparoscopic IL (LIL) and robotic-assisted IL (RAIL), have been utilized for penile cancer. Comparative study is necessary to guide the decision about which minimally invasive technique to select for IL. Therefore we compared RAIL with LIL performed via an antegrade approach in terms of perioperative outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of 43 patients who underwent RAIL (n = 20) or LIL (n = 23) for penile cancer from 2016 to 2020. The key surgical procedures and techniques are described. Complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, and operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph nodal yield, nodal positivity, postoperative drain duration, and disease recurrence during follow-up were assessed. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared whereas continuous variables were compared by t-tests.
Results
The operative time for RAIL was significantly shorter than that of LIL (median 83 vs 95 min). Significantly less blood loss was reported with RAIL than with LIL (median 10 vs 35 ml). Lymph node yield, pathological positive nodes, the hospital stay, postoperative drain duration, postoperative complications and recurrence were similar for RAIL and LIL.
Conclusions
For patients with penile cancer, perioperative outcomes of RAIL and LIL were similar, but there was less blood loss, a shorter operative time for robotic cases.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.