Journal Article

Sequencing accuracy and systematic errors of nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Smyth, Redmond P., Liu-Wei, Wang, van der Toorn, Wiep, Bohn, Patrick, Hölzer, Martin, von Kleist, Max

2024

Overview

Background Direct RNA sequencing (dRNA-seq) on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms can produce reads covering up to full-length gene transcripts, while containing decipherable information about RNA base modifications and poly-A tail lengths. Although many published studies have been expanding the potential of dRNA-seq, its sequencing accuracy and error patterns remain understudied. Results We present the first comprehensive evaluation of sequencing accuracy and characterisation of systematic errors in dRNA-seq data from diverse organisms and synthetic in vitro transcribed RNAs. We found that for sequencing kits SQK-RNA001 and SQK-RNA002, the median read accuracy ranged from 87% to 92% across species, and deletions significantly outnumbered mismatches and insertions. Due to their high abundance in the transcriptome, heteropolymers and short homopolymers were the major contributors to the overall sequencing errors. We also observed systematic biases across all species at the levels of single nucleotides and motifs. In general, cytosine/uracil-rich regions were more likely to be erroneous than guanines and adenines. By examining raw signal data, we identified the underlying signal-level features potentially associated with the error patterns and their dependency on sequence contexts. While read quality scores can be used to approximate error rates at base and read levels, failure to detect DNA adapters may be a source of errors and data loss. By comparing distinct basecallers, we reason that some sequencing errors are attributable to signal insufficiency rather than algorithmic (basecalling) artefacts. Lastly, we generated dRNA-seq data using the latest SQK-RNA004 sequencing kit released at the end of 2023 and found that although the overall read accuracy increased, the systematic errors remain largely identical compared to the previous kits. Conclusions As the first systematic investigation of dRNA-seq errors, this study offers a comprehensive overview of reproducible error patterns across diverse datasets, identifies potential signal-level insufficiency, and lays the foundation for error correction methods.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Accuracy / Adenine / Algorithms / Animal Genetics and Genomics / Animals / Biochemistry, Molecular Biology / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Cytosine / Data loss / Datasets / Direct RNA sequencing / Epitranscriptomics / Error correction / Gene sequencing / Genomes / Genomics / Guanines / High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing - methods / Humans / Life Sciences / Microarrays / Microbial Genetics and Genomics / Nanopore sequencing / Nanopore Sequencing - methods / Nanopores / Nucleotides / Plant Genetics and Genomics / Proteomics / Ribonucleic acid / RNA / RNA - genetics / Sequence Analysis, RNA - methods / Sequencing accuracy / Sequencing errors / Systematic errors / Transcriptomes / Transcriptomics / Uracil