Journal Article

Cost of start-up activities to implement a community-level opioid overdose reduction intervention in the HEALing Communities Study

Harlow, Kristin, Linas, Benjamin P., Barocas, Joshua A., Murphy, Sean M., Starbird, Laura E., Montoya, Iván D., Seiber, Eric E., Watson, Colleen, Amuchi, Brenda, Ryan, Danielle, Speer, Drew, McCollister, Kathryn E., Schackman, Bruce R., Castry, Mathieu, Aldridge, Arnie, Zarkin, Gary A., Orme, Stephen, Bush, Joshua L.

2024

Overview

Background Communities That HEAL (CTH) is a novel, data-driven community-engaged intervention designed to reduce opioid overdose deaths by increasing community engagement, adoption of an integrated set of evidence-based practices, and delivering a communications campaign across healthcare, behavioral-health, criminal-legal, and other community-based settings. The implementation of such a complex initiative requires up-front investments of time and other expenditures (i.e., start-up costs). Despite the importance of these start-up costs in investment decisions to stakeholders, they are typically excluded from cost-effectiveness analyses. The objective of this study is to report a detailed analysis of CTH start-up costs pre-intervention implementation and to describe the relevance of these data for stakeholders to determine implementation feasibility. Methods This study is guided by the community perspective, reflecting the investments that a real-world community would need to incur to implement the CTH intervention. We adopted an activity-based costing approach, in which resources related to hiring, training, purchasing, and community dashboard creation were identified through macro- and micro-costing techniques from 34 communities with high rates of fatal opioid overdoses, across four states—Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Resources were identified and assigned a unit cost using administrative and semi-structured-interview data. All cost estimates were reported in 2019 dollars. Results State-level average and median start-up cost (representing 8–10 communities per state) were $268,657 and $175,683, respectively. Hiring and training represented 40%, equipment and infrastructure costs represented 24%, and dashboard creation represented 36% of the total average start-up cost. Comparatively, hiring and training represented 49%, purchasing costs represented 18%, and dashboard creation represented 34% of the total median start-up cost. Conclusion We identified three distinct CTH hiring models that affected start-up costs: hospital-academic (Massachusetts), university-academic (Kentucky and Ohio), and community-leveraged (New York). Hiring, training, and purchasing start-up costs were lowest in New York due to existing local infrastructure. Community-based implementation similar to the New York model may have lower start-up costs due to leveraging of existing infrastructure, relationships, and support from local health departments.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Analysis / Community / Community engagement / Cost analysis / Cost benefit analysis / Costing / Costs / Counties / Data / Data collection / Deaths / Delivery of Health Care / Drug overdose / Drugs / Economic aspects / Education / Evidence-based medicine / Evidence-Based Practice / Feasibility / Harm reduction / Healing / Health behavior / Health care / Health Psychology / Health services / Hiring / Hospitals / Humans / Implementation / Informed consent / Infrastructure / Intervention / Intervention implementation / Interviews / Investments / Law enforcement / Local government / Massachusetts / Medical care, Cost of / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Mental health / Narcotics / Opiate Overdose / Opioid use disorder / Opioids / Overdose / Overdoses / Pharmacology/Toxicology / Psychopharmacology / Public Health / Purchasing / Social Work / Stakeholders / Start-up cost / Stigma / Substance use disorder / Training