Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
RETRACTED: The effect of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound related complications: A meta‐analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
RETRACTED: The effect of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound related complications: A meta‐analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
RETRACTED: The effect of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound related complications: A meta‐analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
RETRACTED: The effect of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound related complications: A meta‐analysis
2024
Overview
Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), a routine nursing procedure before paediatric bowel surgery, is widely should in clinical practice, but its necessity remains controversial. In a systematic review and meta‐analysis, we evaluated the effect of preoperative MBP in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound‐related complications in order to analyse the clinical application value of MBP in paediatric bowel surgery. As of November 2023, we searched four online databases: the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Two investigators screened the collected studies against inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ROBINS‐I was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Using RevMan5.3, a meta‐analysis of the collected data was performed, and a fixed‐effect model or a random‐effect model was used to analyse OR, 95% CI, SMD, and MD. A total of 11 studies with 2556 patients were included. Most of studies had moderate‐to‐severe quality bias. The results of meta‐analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications related to postoperative infections in children with MBP before bowel surgery versus those with No MBP, wound infection (OR 1.11, 95% CI:0.76 ~ 1.61, p = 0.59, I 2 = 5%), intra‐abdominal infection (OR 1.26, 95% CI:0.58 ~ 2.77, p = 0.56, I 2 = 9%). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative bowel anastomotic leak (OR 1.07, 95% CI:0.68 ~ 1.68, p = 0.78, I 2 = 12%), and anastomotic dehiscence (OR 1.67, 95% CI:0.13 ~ 22.20, p = 0.70, I 2 = 73%). Patients' intestinal obstruction did not show an advantage of undergoing MBP preoperatively, with an incidence of intestinal obstruction (OR 1.95, 95% CI:0.55 ~ 6.93, p = 0.30, I 2 = 0%). Based on existing evidence that preoperative MBP in paediatric bowel surgery did not reduce the risk of postoperative wound complications, we cautiously assume that MBP before surgery is unnecessary for children undergoing elective bowel surgery. However, due to the limited number of study participants selected for this study and the overall low quality of evidence, the results need to be interpreted with caution. It is suggested that more high quality, large‐sample, multicenter clinical trials are required to validate our findings.
