Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
by
Griffith, John P
, Boni Luigi
, Coleman, Mark G
, Hasegawa Hirotoshi
, Lorenzon, Laura
, McGrath, John
, De Angelis Nicola
, Spinelli Antonino
, Pellino Gianluca
, Cecil, Tom D
, Acheson, Austin G
, Celentano Valerio
, Smart, Neil
, Lal Pawanindra
, Giglio, Mariano Cesare
, Obermair Andreas
, Gupta, Sharmila
, Cahill, Ronan A
in
Endoscopy
/ Gastrointestinal surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Minimally invasive surgery
/ Peer review
/ Questionnaires
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Urology
/ Validity
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
by
Griffith, John P
, Boni Luigi
, Coleman, Mark G
, Hasegawa Hirotoshi
, Lorenzon, Laura
, McGrath, John
, De Angelis Nicola
, Spinelli Antonino
, Pellino Gianluca
, Cecil, Tom D
, Acheson, Austin G
, Celentano Valerio
, Smart, Neil
, Lal Pawanindra
, Giglio, Mariano Cesare
, Obermair Andreas
, Gupta, Sharmila
, Cahill, Ronan A
in
Endoscopy
/ Gastrointestinal surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Minimally invasive surgery
/ Peer review
/ Questionnaires
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Urology
/ Validity
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
by
Griffith, John P
, Boni Luigi
, Coleman, Mark G
, Hasegawa Hirotoshi
, Lorenzon, Laura
, McGrath, John
, De Angelis Nicola
, Spinelli Antonino
, Pellino Gianluca
, Cecil, Tom D
, Acheson, Austin G
, Celentano Valerio
, Smart, Neil
, Lal Pawanindra
, Giglio, Mariano Cesare
, Obermair Andreas
, Gupta, Sharmila
, Cahill, Ronan A
in
Endoscopy
/ Gastrointestinal surgery
/ Laparoscopy
/ Minimally invasive surgery
/ Peer review
/ Questionnaires
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Urology
/ Validity
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
Journal Article
Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
IntroductionThere has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool.MethodsAn international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development.Results9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability.ConclusionsWe propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs.Graphic Abstract
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.