Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation
by
Volkova, Svitlana
, Arendt, Dustin
, Cosbey, Robin
, Glenski, Maria
, Ayton, Ellyn
in
Machine learning
/ Perturbation
/ Robustness
/ Tactics
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation
by
Volkova, Svitlana
, Arendt, Dustin
, Cosbey, Robin
, Glenski, Maria
, Ayton, Ellyn
in
Machine learning
/ Perturbation
/ Robustness
/ Tactics
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation
Paper
Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
With the increasing use of machine-learning driven algorithmic judgements, it is critical to develop models that are robust to evolving or manipulated inputs. We propose an extensive analysis of model robustness against linguistic variation in the setting of deceptive news detection, an important task in the context of misinformation spread online. We consider two prediction tasks and compare three state-of-the-art embeddings to highlight consistent trends in model performance, high confidence misclassifications, and high impact failures. By measuring the effectiveness of adversarial defense strategies and evaluating model susceptibility to adversarial attacks using character- and word-perturbed text, we find that character or mixed ensemble models are the most effective defenses and that character perturbation-based attack tactics are more successful.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.