Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Santa Barbara Binary-Disk Code Comparison
by
D'Orazio, Daniel J
, Ryan, Geoffrey
, Siwek, Magdalena
, Tiede, Christopher
, Pirog, Michal
, Wang, Haiyang
, Duffell, Paul C
, Dittmann, Alexander J
, Zrake, Jonathan
, Ragusa, Enrico
, Haiman, Zoltan
, Lupi, Alessandro
, Franchini, Alessia
, Penzlin, Anna B T
, Kratter, Kaitlin M
, Dempsey, Adam M
in
Binary codes
/ Codes
/ Convergence
/ Disks
/ Kinematics
/ Mathematical models
/ Numerical analysis
/ Numerical methods
/ Orbits
/ Parameters
/ Three dimensional models
/ Torque
/ Viscosity
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Santa Barbara Binary-Disk Code Comparison
by
D'Orazio, Daniel J
, Ryan, Geoffrey
, Siwek, Magdalena
, Tiede, Christopher
, Pirog, Michal
, Wang, Haiyang
, Duffell, Paul C
, Dittmann, Alexander J
, Zrake, Jonathan
, Ragusa, Enrico
, Haiman, Zoltan
, Lupi, Alessandro
, Franchini, Alessia
, Penzlin, Anna B T
, Kratter, Kaitlin M
, Dempsey, Adam M
in
Binary codes
/ Codes
/ Convergence
/ Disks
/ Kinematics
/ Mathematical models
/ Numerical analysis
/ Numerical methods
/ Orbits
/ Parameters
/ Three dimensional models
/ Torque
/ Viscosity
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Santa Barbara Binary-Disk Code Comparison
by
D'Orazio, Daniel J
, Ryan, Geoffrey
, Siwek, Magdalena
, Tiede, Christopher
, Pirog, Michal
, Wang, Haiyang
, Duffell, Paul C
, Dittmann, Alexander J
, Zrake, Jonathan
, Ragusa, Enrico
, Haiman, Zoltan
, Lupi, Alessandro
, Franchini, Alessia
, Penzlin, Anna B T
, Kratter, Kaitlin M
, Dempsey, Adam M
in
Binary codes
/ Codes
/ Convergence
/ Disks
/ Kinematics
/ Mathematical models
/ Numerical analysis
/ Numerical methods
/ Orbits
/ Parameters
/ Three dimensional models
/ Torque
/ Viscosity
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
The Santa Barbara Binary-Disk Code Comparison
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We have performed numerical calculations of a binary interacting with a gas disk, using eleven different numerical methods and a standard binary-disk setup. The goal of this study is to determine whether all codes agree on a numerically converged solution, and to determine the necessary resolution for convergence and the number of binary orbits that must be computed to reach an agreed-upon relaxed state of the binary-disk system. We find that all codes can agree on a converged solution (depending on the diagnostic being measured). The zone spacing required for most codes to reach a converged measurement of the torques applied to the binary by the disk is roughly 1% of the binary separation in the vicinity of the binary components. For our disk model to reach a relaxed state, codes must be run for at least 200 binary orbits, corresponding to about a viscous time for our parameters, \\(0.2 (a^2 _B /)\\) binary orbits, where \\(\\) is the kinematic viscosity. We did not investigate dependence on binary mass ratio, eccentricity, disk temperature, or disk viscosity; therefore, these benchmarks may act as guides towards expanding converged solutions to the wider parameter space but might need to be updated in a future study that investigates dependence on system parameters. We find the most major discrepancies between codes resulted from the dimensionality of the setup (3D vs 2D disks). Beyond this, we find good agreement in the total torque on the binary between codes, although the partition of this torque between the gravitational torque, orbital accretion torque, and spin accretion torque depends sensitively on the sink prescriptions employed. In agreement with previous studies, we find a modest difference in torques and accretion variability between 2D and 3D disk models. We find cavity precession rates to be appreciably faster in 3D than in 2D.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.