Journal Article

Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts

Benvenisti, Eyal

2008

نظرة عامة

Not so long ago the overwhelming majority of courts in democratic countries shared a reluctance to refer to foreign and international law. Their policy was to avoid any application of foreign sources of law that would clash with the position of their domestic governments. Many jurists find recourse to foreign and international law inappropriate. But even the supporters of reference to external sources of law hold this unexplored assumption that reliance on foreign and international law inevitably comes into tension with the value of national sovereignty. Hence, the scholarly debate is framed along the lines of the well-known broader debate on “the countermajoritarian difficulty.” This article questions this assumption of tension. It argues that for courts in most democratic countries—even if not for U.S. courts at present—referring to foreign and international law has become an effective instrument for empoweringthe domestic democratic processes by shielding them from external economic, political, and even legal pressures. Citing international law therefore actually bolsters domestic democratic processes and reclaims national sovereignty from the diverse forces of globalization. Stated differently, most national courts, seeking to maintain the vitality of their national political institutions and to safeguard their own domestic status vis-a-vis the political branches, cannot afford to ignore foreign and international law.

• الناشر: Cambridge University Press,American Society of International Law
• موضوع: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW / Countries / COURTS / Courts of law / DEMOCRACY / FOREIGN INVESTMENTS / Foreign policy / Government / Human rights / INTERNATIONAL COURTS / International law / International relations / Judicial process / Judicial review / Jurisprudence / Law / Laws, regulations and rules / Refugees / Sovereignty / Statutory interpretation / Terrorism / Treaties