استكشف المجموعة الواسعة من العناوين المتاحة.

Background Maintaining robust perfusion is an important physiologic parameter in wound healing. The effect of different closure techniques on wound perfusion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been established previously and may have implications for wound healing. Questions/purposes We asked whether a running subcuticular, vertical mattress, or skin staple closure technique enables the most robust wound perfusion after TKA as measured by laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography (LA-ICGA) in patients without specific risk factors for wound healing complications. Methods Forty-five patients undergoing primary TKA without comorbidities known to impact wound healing and perfusion were prospectively randomized to receive superficial skin closure with one of the following techniques: (1) running subcuticular (3-0 monofilament); (2) vertical mattress (2-0 nylon); or (3) skin staples. Twenty procedures were performed by RTT, 15 by RJS, and 10 by FHS. All surgeons used an anterior skin incision over the medial third of the patella in combination with a median parapatellar arthrotomy. Perfusion was assessed with a LA-ICGA device and software system immediately after closure to quantify fluorescence. Twenty-seven points were assessed immediately after closure in the operating room in each patient (nine along the incision and nine pairs medial and lateral to the incision). Mean incision perfusion was determined from the nine points along the incision with higher values indicating greater blood flow. Mean perfusion impairment was determined by calculating the difference between the nine pairs of surrounding skin and the nine points along the incision with smaller values indicating less perfusion impairment. These parameters were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent pairwise comparisons with an unadjusted analysis as well as a multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Patients were followed for a mean of 7 months after surgery (range, 3–12 months) for possible incision-related complications. No patents were lost to followup. Results Running subcuticular closure demonstrated the best overall perfusion. Mean incision perfusion in fluorescent units with SD was as follows: running subcuticular, 64 (16); vertical mattress, 32 (18); and staples, 19 (7) (ANOVA p < 0.001). The running subcuticular closure demonstrated the least impairment of perfusion among the closures compared. Mean perfusion impairment was as follows: running subcuticular, 21 (12); vertical mattress, 37 (24); and staples, 69 (27) (ANOVA p < 0.001). All Tukey-adjusted pairwise comparisons from both metrics likewise favored the subcuticular closure (p < 0.001) both before and after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. One patient in the vertical mattress cohort experienced a surgical site infection; no other wound-related complications were observed in this study. Conclusions The method of closure can influence skin and soft tissue perfusion after TKA. Running subcuticular closure enables the most physiologic robust blood flow, which may improve wound healing. However, the clinical importance of these findings remains uncertain, because patients in this study were selected because they lacked risk factors for wound healing complications. Studies with this modality in specific patient populations at higher risk for wound complications will be necessary to quantify the clinical advantage of using running subcuticular closure. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study.

Describe dosing of local anesthetic when both a periarticular injection (PAI) and peripheral nerve block (PNB) are utilized for knee arthroplasty analgesia, and compare the dosing of local to suggested maximum dosing, and look for evidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). A single center retrospective cohort study between May 2018 and November 2022. A major academic hospital. Patients who had both a PAI and PNB while undergoing primary, revision, total, partial, unilateral, or bilateral knee arthroplasty. None. Calculate the dose of local anesthetic given via PAI, PNB, and both routes combined as based on lean body weight and compare that to the suggested maximum dosing. Look for medications, clinical interventions, and critical event notes suggestive of a LAST event. There were 4527 knee arthroplasties where both a PAI and PNB were performed during the study period. When combining PAI and PNB doses, >75% of patients received more than the suggested maximum dose of 3 mg/kg lean body weight. The median local anesthetic dosing over the study period, 4.4 mg/kg (IQR 3.5,5.9), was 147% of the suggested maximum dose (IQR 117,197). There was no conclusive evidence of LAST among any of the patients in the study. Over the course of our study, we had 4527 knee arthroplasties with a median PAI and PNB local anesthetic dose that was 147% of the suggested maximum without any clear clinical evidence of a LAST event. [Display omitted] •Total combined dose of local anesthetic given via PAI and PNB often exceeds suggested maximum lean body weight-based amount.•No definitive local anesthetic toxicity events were observed in this retrospective single-center study.•Maximum recommended doses of bupivacaine and ropivacaine could be reevaluated in knee arthroplasty.

Background Although some surgeons strongly advocate for one approach over the other, there are few data directly comparing the direct anterior approach with a miniposterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Questions/purposes Using the same advanced pain and rapid rehabilitation protocols for both groups, we compared the direct anterior and miniposterior approaches with respect to (1) return to activities of daily living at 2 days, 2 weeks, or 2 months; (2) risk of intraoperative or early postoperative complications; and (3) component position. Methods Over a 1-year period we identified all consecutive, primary direct anterior and miniposterior THAs performed by two surgeons at our institution, totaling 242 patients. Of those, 20 did not meet inclusion criteria as a result of prior trauma or surgery about the hip. A total of 222 patients, 126 direct anterior and 96 miniposterior, were retrospectively evaluated. All cases were done by one of two surgeons, one of whom performs THA exclusively through the direct anterior approach and the other who only uses the miniposterior approach. Groups did not differ demographically with mean ± SD age 64 ± 12 years, mean body mass index 30 ± 5.7 kg/m 2 , and 50% female. The same rapid rehabilitation protocols were used with no postoperative hip positioning precautions. Results No differences were seen between the two groups in mean length of stay (2.2 days; range, 1–9 days), operative or in-hospital complications, intravenous breakthrough analgesia, stairs, maximum feet walked in-hospital, or percent discharged to home (80% [177 of 222]; all p > 0.2). The direct anterior patients had longer mean operative times (114 minutes; range, 60–251 minutes) than the miniposterior patients (mean, 60 minutes; range, 41–113 minutes; p < 0.001). The direct anterior group had a higher maximum visual analog scale pain score (5.3 direct anterior; ± 2, versus 3.8 MP; ± 2; p < 0.0001). At 2 weeks, more direct anterior patients required gait aids (92% [116 of 126]) than miniposterior (68% [62 of 96]; p < 0.0001). At 8 weeks, direct anterior patients had higher mean Harris hip scores (95 versus 89) but a lower return to work and driving with no difference in their use of gait aids, narcotics, activities of daily living, or walking 0.5 mile. More wound problems occurred in the miniposterior group (p < 0.01). With the numbers available, component alignment was not different between the study groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions There was no systematic advantage of direct anterior THA versus miniposterior THA. Contrary to conventional belief and somewhat surprising were the fewer minor wound problems in the direct anterior group and the higher proportion of patients free of gait aids at 2 weeks and back to driving and working at 8 weeks in the miniposterior group. Factors other than surgical approach, perhaps including attentive pain management, patient selection, surgical volume and experience, careful preoperative templating, and rapid rehabilitation protocols, may be more important in terms of influencing early recovery after THA. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Pelvic discontinuity is an increasingly common complication of THA. Treatments of this complex situation are varied, including cup-cage constructs, acetabular allografts with plating, pelvic distraction technique, and custom triflange acetabular components. It is unclear whether any of these offer substantial advantages. Questions/purposes We therefore determined (1) revision and overall survival rates, (2) discontinuity healing rate, and (3) Harris hip score (HHS) after treatment of pelvic discontinuity with a custom triflange acetabular component and (4) the cost of this reconstructive operation compared to other constructs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients with pelvic discontinuity treated with revision THA using a custom triflange acetabular component. We reviewed operative reports, radiographs, and clinical data for clinical and radiographic results. We also performed a cost comparison with utilization of other techniques. Minimum followup was 24 months (average, 65 months; range, 24–215 months). Results Fifty-six of 57 (98%) were free of revision for aseptic loosening at latest followup. Fifty-four (95%) were free of revision of the triflange component for any reason. Thirty-seven (65%) were free of revision for any reason. Twenty-eight (49%) were free of revision for any reason and free of any component migration and had a healed discontinuity. Forty-six (81%) had a stable triflange component with a healed pelvic discontinuity. Average HHS was 74.8. The costs of the custom triflange implants and a Trabecular Metal ® cup-cage construct were equivalent: $12,500 and $11,250, respectively. Conclusions In this group of patients with osteolytic pelvic discontinuity, triflange implants provided predictable mid-term fixation at a cost equivalent to other treatment methods. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Serum markers of inflammation and muscle damage have shown clinical utility in some areas of medicine, but their value in determining the invasiveness or in predicting the early functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been demonstrated. Questions/purposes (1) Do serum markers of inflammation/muscle damage predict pain or early functional outcomes after contemporary THA performed through a direct anterior or miniposterior approach? (2) Do early functional outcomes as measured by in-hospital outcomes and clinical milestones differ between a contemporary direct anterior and miniposterior approach for THA? Methods Between August 31, 2013, and September 1, 2014, all patients presenting as candidates for THA at our institution who had not already had preoperative blood draws (161) were recruited for this study. Forty-two patients failed these exclusion criteria, eight patients declined enrollment, and 11 were consented but did not complete the required preoperative blood tests. Recruitment stopped when 50 patients had been enrolled in both the direct anterior group and the miniposterior group (2n = 100) based on a priori power analysis. One high-volume surgeon performed all of the direct anterior approaches and three high-volume surgeons performed the miniposterior approaches. Groups did not differ with the numbers available in mean age (63 years; SD 10; range, 35–86 years), sex (52% female), or mean body mass index (mean 31 kg/m 2 ; SD 7 kg/m 2 ; range, 20–73 kg/m 2 ). Serum markers measured including hemoglobin, hematocrit, myoglobin, creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α were collected at the preoperative clinic visit and on postoperative days 1 and 2 and compared with operative details, in-hospital complications, therapy progress, pain scores, and functional results from a milestone diary. Functional results evaluated included time to discontinue all narcotics and gait aids, independence with activities of daily living, return to driving a motor vehicle, and return to work. Results Serum markers after contemporary THA were not correlated with early functional outcomes either in-hospital or postdischarge. Specifically, no serum marker was predictive of the time to discontinue gait aids or narcotics, return to driving, climb stairs, or independence in activities of daily living (all p > 0.08). The patients receiving the direct anterior approach did have lesser elevations of CK levels than the patients undergoing the miniposterior approach (436 ± 312 [direct anterior {DA}] versus 1071 ± 459 [miniposterior {MP}], difference in means: −635; 95% confidence interval [CI], −809 to −462; p < 0.001), myoglobin levels (168 ± 114 [DA] versus 378 ± 151 [MP], difference in means: −210, 95% CI, −269 to −151; p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (79 ± 57 [DA] versus 124 ± 58 [MP], difference in means: −46, 95% CI, −71 to −21; p < 0.001), and interleukin-6 (45 ± 34 [DA] versus 80 ± 53 [MP], difference in means: −35, 95% CI, −54 to −16; p < 0.001), but not in other serum markers. In the hospital, patients undergoing the direct anterior approach ambulated 35 steps farther with physical therapy (178 feet DA versus 142 feet MP, p < 0.01, difference in means: 35, 95% CI, 9–62; p = 0.009) and had visual analog scale pain scores 1.1 less (4.8 DA versus 5.9 MP, difference in means: −1.1, 95% CI, 2.0 to −0.2; p = 0.02) than patients undergoing the miniposterior approach. There were no differences between approaches in other in-hospital outcomes or in posthospital clinical milestones. Conclusions Serum markers including CK, myoglobin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α did not predict early pain/function after contemporary THA approaches. Although lesser elevations in myoglobin, CK, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 were found after direct anterior THA, that difference was not clinically meaningful. Further reporting of serum biomarkers as a measure of physiological burden after orthopaedic surgical procedures should be viewed as suspect until clear linear or threshold values are established. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

Purpose The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of research on the application of artificial intelligence (AI)–based three-dimensional (3D) templating in preoperative planning of total joint arthroplasty. Methods This scoping review followed the PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and five stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. Studies of patients undergoing primary or revision joint arthroplasty surgery that utilised AI-based 3D templating for surgical planning were included. Outcome measures included dataset and model development characteristics, AI performance metrics, and time performance. After AI-based 3D planning, the accuracy of component size and placement estimation and postoperative outcome data were collected. Results Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria including a focus on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based AI templating for use in hip or knee arthroplasty. AI-based 3D templating systems reduced surgical planning time and improved implant size/position and imaging feature estimation compared to conventional radiographic templating. Several components of data processing and model development and testing were insufficiently covered in the studies included in this scoping review. Conclusions AI-based 3D templating systems have the potential to improve preoperative planning for joint arthroplasty surgery. This technology offers more accurate and personalized preoperative planning, which has potential to improve functional outcomes for patients. However, deficiencies in several key areas, including data handling, model development, and testing, can potentially hinder the reproducibility and reliability of the methods proposed. As such, further research is needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of these systems.

Background Achieving adequate alignment has traditionally been an important goal in total knee arthroplasty to achieve long-term implant survival. While accelerometer-based hand-held navigation systems (ABN) has been introduced as a way to achieve alignment, there is a limited body of evidence on its accuracy, especially in patients under 65 years with differing etiologies for knee arthritis. This study aimed to assess the precision of a specific ABN system in restoring the mechanical axis and report surgical variables and complications, with particular attention to younger patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 310 primary TKA performed with ABN from May 2016 to February 2021. The mean patient age was 67.4 (SD 8.9) years, with 43% under 65 years and mean body mass index of 33.2 (SD 6.8). The average surgical time was 96.8 min (57–171) and the average follow-up was 3.3 years (1.9–6.7). Data regarding length of stay, pain, range of motion (ROM), complications, and reinterventions were collected from the institutional joint arthroplasty registry and the medical records. Preoperative mechanical axis measurements and postoperative radiological data, including mechanical axis, component alignment and mechanical alignment outliers were analyzed. Results The mean preoperative mechanical axis was 175.4° (SD 7.6), with 248 knees (80%) in preoperative varus. The mean postoperative mechanical axis was 179.5° (SD 1.96) with 98% of knees falling within ± 3° of the neutral mechanical axis. Only 6 knees (2 varus, 4 valgus) fell outside the ± 3° range. And 3 knees (1 varus, 2 valgus) fell outside the ± 5° range. In the sagittal plane, 296 knees (95.5%) knees were within ± 3° of goal of 3 degrees of femoral flexion and 302 (97.4%) knees were within ± 2° of goal 1° of slope for tibial component. Far outliers (alignment outside ± 5° of targeted position) were found in 3 knees. Factors such as posttraumatic arthrosis, previous surgery, presence of retained hardware, and age below 65 years were not associated with increase in alignment outliers and far outliers. No complications related to the navigation system were observed. There were 22 complications and 20 reoperations, including 2 revisions for periprosthetic joint infection and 1 revision for flexion instability. Patients that required knee manipulation achieved an ultimate flexion of 110° (SD 14.1). Conclusions The ABN system proved to be user-friendly and accurate in reducing alignment outliers in both coronal and sagittal planes in all patient populations. It offers a straightforward navigation solution while preserving surgeon autonomy and the use of traditional surgical tools. These findings advocate for the integration of this navigation system as a valuable tool to enhance the precision of TKA surgery in all patient groups.

Introduction Some patients opt to undergo conversion to a THA for continued pain or progression of hip arthritis after periacetabular osteotomy. Whether patients are at greater risk for postoperative complications, revision THA, poor clinical outcomes, or compromised radiographic results after periacetabular osteotomy is debatable. Questions/purposes When compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent THAs for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) without previous periacetabular osteotomy, we asked whether a THA after a periacetabular osteotomy has (1) a higher complication rate, (2) a higher likelihood of resulting in revision THA, (3) comparable improvements in Harris hip score, and (4) comparable radiographic results. Patients and Methods A multicenter retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing 645 periacetabular osteotomies was performed. Twenty-three hips in 22 patients underwent a THA after periacetabular osteotomy. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI with 23 hips in 23 patients with DDH undergoing THA without a history of periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum followup for both groups of patients was 2 years (mean, 10 ± 4 years and 6 ± 4 years, respectively). Comparisons were made to answer the study questions based on a retrospective review from prospectively maintained registries of clinical and radiographic information at two participating centers. Results With the numbers available, there was no difference in complication or revision rates between the two groups (p = 0.489 and 1.000, respectively); however, a post hoc power analysis showed our study was underpowered to detect a difference in the rate of postoperative complications or revision THA. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score with THA after periacetabular osteotomy (p < 0.001) and THA for DDH (p < 0.001), but there was no difference (p = 0.265) in the Harris hip score at final followup between either group. The acetabular component was placed at a mean of 17° more retroversion during THA after periacetabular osteotomy compared with THA for DDH (p = 0.002). Conclusions This study did not detect any differences in the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA after periacetabular osteotomy done with a modern abductor-sparing approach when compared with a matched cohort undergoing THA for DDH. However, even with patients tallied across two high-volume centers during nearly 15 years, our study was underpowered to detect potentially important differences between the THA after periacetabular osteotomy group and the THA for DDH group. The data in this report are suitable as pilot data for future studies and for systematic reviews. Larger multicenter studies are needed to understand how the technical challenges of THA after periacetabular osteotomy affect postoperative complications and revision THA. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a technique popular among some arthroplasty surgeons. There is currently a paucity of data regarding reasons for failure of THA using the DAA. The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 56 patients who underwent revision THA at their institution after failing primary THA that was performed through a DAA either at their institution (n=8) or elsewhere (n=48) from January 1, 2010, to June 1, 2017. Patients were grouped by modes of failure and compared using patient characteristics, surgical factors, and radiographic outcomes. Total hip arthroplasties performed through the DAA failed due to infection in 21 (38%) patients, aseptic/mechanical loosening in 14 (25%) patients, intraoperative fracture in 6 (11%) patients, postoperative fracture in 6 (11%) patients, tendinitis or pain of unknown etiology in 3 (5%) patients, metallosis in 3 (5%) patients, instability/dislocation in 2 (4%) patients, and leg length discrepancy in 1 (2%) patient. Patients who underwent revision due to unrecognized intraoperative fracture had a lower body mass index (BMI) and weight than patients who had failure due to postoperative fracture, aseptic loosening, or infection. The 4 most common modes of failure included infection, aseptic loosening, unrecognized intraoperative fracture, and postoperative fracture. Together, these made up 84% of failed DAA THAs. Patients with a lower BMI are more likely to have failure due to intraoperative fractures. Patients with a higher BMI are more likely to have failure due to postoperative fracture, aseptic loosening, or infection. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(4);239–244.]