تفاصيل الأصول
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
هل ترغب في حجز الكتاب؟
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
بواسطة
Hultcrantz, Monica
, Mustafa, Reem A.
, Helfand, Mark
, Santesso, Nancy
, Ansari, Mohammed T.
, Rosen, Måns
, Meerpohl, Joerg
, Crowther, Mark
, Schünemann, Holger J.
, Leeflang, Mariska
, Scholten, Rob
, Kunz, Regina
, Muti, Paola
, Hooft, Lotty
, Langendam, Miranda
, Raatz, Heike
, Harris, Jeff
, Glasziou, Paul
, Lange, Stefan
, Bossuyt, Patrick
, Brozek, Jan
, Williams, John
, Akl, Elie A.
, Steingart, Karen R.
, Guyatt, Gordon H.
, Jaeschke, Roman
, Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo
, Rutjes, Anne
, Vist, Gunn E.
, Kohli, Mikashmi
, Murad, Mohammad Hassan
في
Accuracy
/ Bias
/ Biomedical Research - standards
/ Certainty of evidence
/ Cervical cancer
/ Clinical decision making
/ Data Accuracy
/ Decision making
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic accuracy
/ Domains
/ Epidemiology
/ GRADE
/ GRADE Approach - standards
/ Guidelines
/ Guidelines as Topic
/ HTA
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Literature reviews
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Meningitis
/ Patients
/ Public health
/ Publication Bias - statistics & numerical data
/ Research Design - standards
/ Skin
/ Systematic review
/ Systematic reviews
/ Technology assessment
/ Test accuracy
/ Tests
/ Tuberculosis
2020
لقد وضعنا الحجز لك!
بالمناسبة ، لماذا لا تستكشف الفعاليات التي يمكنك حضورها عند زيارتك للمكتبة لإستلام كتبك
أنت حاليًا في قائمة الانتظار لالتقاط هذا الكتاب. سيتم إخطارك بمجرد انتهاء دورك في التقاط الكتاب
هل أنت متأكد أنك تريد إزالة الكتاب من الرف؟
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
بواسطة
Hultcrantz, Monica
, Mustafa, Reem A.
, Helfand, Mark
, Santesso, Nancy
, Ansari, Mohammed T.
, Rosen, Måns
, Meerpohl, Joerg
, Crowther, Mark
, Schünemann, Holger J.
, Leeflang, Mariska
, Scholten, Rob
, Kunz, Regina
, Muti, Paola
, Hooft, Lotty
, Langendam, Miranda
, Raatz, Heike
, Harris, Jeff
, Glasziou, Paul
, Lange, Stefan
, Bossuyt, Patrick
, Brozek, Jan
, Williams, John
, Akl, Elie A.
, Steingart, Karen R.
, Guyatt, Gordon H.
, Jaeschke, Roman
, Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo
, Rutjes, Anne
, Vist, Gunn E.
, Kohli, Mikashmi
, Murad, Mohammad Hassan
في
Accuracy
/ Bias
/ Biomedical Research - standards
/ Certainty of evidence
/ Cervical cancer
/ Clinical decision making
/ Data Accuracy
/ Decision making
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic accuracy
/ Domains
/ Epidemiology
/ GRADE
/ GRADE Approach - standards
/ Guidelines
/ Guidelines as Topic
/ HTA
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Literature reviews
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Meningitis
/ Patients
/ Public health
/ Publication Bias - statistics & numerical data
/ Research Design - standards
/ Skin
/ Systematic review
/ Systematic reviews
/ Technology assessment
/ Test accuracy
/ Tests
/ Tuberculosis
2020
وجه الفتاة! هناك خطأ ما.
أثناء محاولة إزالة العنوان من الرف ، حدث خطأ ما :( يرجى إعادة المحاولة لاحقًا!
وجه الفتاة! هناك خطأ ما.
أثناء محاولة إضافة العنوان إلى الرف ، حدث خطأ ما :( يرجى إعادة المحاولة لاحقًا!
هل تريد طلب الكتاب؟
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
بواسطة
Hultcrantz, Monica
, Mustafa, Reem A.
, Helfand, Mark
, Santesso, Nancy
, Ansari, Mohammed T.
, Rosen, Måns
, Meerpohl, Joerg
, Crowther, Mark
, Schünemann, Holger J.
, Leeflang, Mariska
, Scholten, Rob
, Kunz, Regina
, Muti, Paola
, Hooft, Lotty
, Langendam, Miranda
, Raatz, Heike
, Harris, Jeff
, Glasziou, Paul
, Lange, Stefan
, Bossuyt, Patrick
, Brozek, Jan
, Williams, John
, Akl, Elie A.
, Steingart, Karen R.
, Guyatt, Gordon H.
, Jaeschke, Roman
, Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo
, Rutjes, Anne
, Vist, Gunn E.
, Kohli, Mikashmi
, Murad, Mohammad Hassan
في
Accuracy
/ Bias
/ Biomedical Research - standards
/ Certainty of evidence
/ Cervical cancer
/ Clinical decision making
/ Data Accuracy
/ Decision making
/ Diagnosis
/ Diagnostic accuracy
/ Domains
/ Epidemiology
/ GRADE
/ GRADE Approach - standards
/ Guidelines
/ Guidelines as Topic
/ HTA
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Literature reviews
/ Medical diagnosis
/ Meningitis
/ Patients
/ Public health
/ Publication Bias - statistics & numerical data
/ Research Design - standards
/ Skin
/ Systematic review
/ Systematic reviews
/ Technology assessment
/ Test accuracy
/ Tests
/ Tuberculosis
2020
يرجى العلم أن الكتاب الذي طلبته لا يمكن استعارته. إذا كنت ترغب في إستعارة هذا الكتاب ، يمكنك حجز نسخة أخرى
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Journal Article
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
2020
الطلب من المخزن الآلي
واختر طريقة الاستلام
نظرة عامة
This article provides updated GRADE guidance about how authors of systematic reviews and health technology assessments and guideline developers can rate the certainty of evidence (also known as quality of the evidence or confidence in the estimates) of a body of evidence addressing test accuracy (TA) on the domains imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias, and other domains. It also provides guidance for how to present synthesized information in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
We present guidance for rating certainty in TA in clinical and public health and review the presentation of results of a body of evidence regarding tests.
Supplemented by practical examples, we describe how raters of the evidence can apply the GRADE domains inconsistency, imprecision, and publication bias to a body of evidence of TA studies.
Using GRADE in Cochrane and other reviews as well as World Health Organization and other guidelines helped refining the GRADE approach for rating the certainty of a body of evidence from TA studies. Although several of the GRADE domains (e.g., imprecision and magnitude of the association) require further methodological research to help operationalize them, judgments need to be made on the basis of what is known so far.
الناشر
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
موضوع
يستخدم هذا الموقع ملفات تعريف الارتباط لضمان حصولك على أفضل تجربة على موقعنا.