تفاصيل الأصول
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
هل ترغب في حجز الكتاب؟
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
بواسطة
Bolon, Brad
, Aeffner, Famke
, Martin, Nathan T.
, Black, Joshua C.
, Rudmann, Daniel G.
, Hendriks, Cris L. Luengo
, Wilson, Kristin
, Young, G. Dave
, Koegler, Sally R.
, Krueger, Joseph
, Gianani, Roberto
في
Analysis
/ Automation
/ Bias
/ Biological markers
/ Biomarkers
/ Biomarkers - analysis
/ Blood pressure
/ Clinical decision making
/ Cognitive ability
/ Decision making
/ Handbooks
/ Histology
/ Histopathology
/ Humans
/ Hypertension
/ Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Image processing
/ Immunohistochemistry - methods
/ Paradigms
/ Pathology
/ Pathology, Clinical - methods
/ Preferences
/ Studies
/ Therapeutics
2017
لقد وضعنا الحجز لك!
بالمناسبة ، لماذا لا تستكشف الفعاليات التي يمكنك حضورها عند زيارتك للمكتبة لإستلام كتبك
أنت حاليًا في قائمة الانتظار لالتقاط هذا الكتاب. سيتم إخطارك بمجرد انتهاء دورك في التقاط الكتاب
هل أنت متأكد أنك تريد إزالة الكتاب من الرف؟
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
بواسطة
Bolon, Brad
, Aeffner, Famke
, Martin, Nathan T.
, Black, Joshua C.
, Rudmann, Daniel G.
, Hendriks, Cris L. Luengo
, Wilson, Kristin
, Young, G. Dave
, Koegler, Sally R.
, Krueger, Joseph
, Gianani, Roberto
في
Analysis
/ Automation
/ Bias
/ Biological markers
/ Biomarkers
/ Biomarkers - analysis
/ Blood pressure
/ Clinical decision making
/ Cognitive ability
/ Decision making
/ Handbooks
/ Histology
/ Histopathology
/ Humans
/ Hypertension
/ Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Image processing
/ Immunohistochemistry - methods
/ Paradigms
/ Pathology
/ Pathology, Clinical - methods
/ Preferences
/ Studies
/ Therapeutics
2017
وجه الفتاة! هناك خطأ ما.
أثناء محاولة إزالة العنوان من الرف ، حدث خطأ ما :( يرجى إعادة المحاولة لاحقًا!
وجه الفتاة! هناك خطأ ما.
أثناء محاولة إضافة العنوان إلى الرف ، حدث خطأ ما :( يرجى إعادة المحاولة لاحقًا!
هل تريد طلب الكتاب؟
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
بواسطة
Bolon, Brad
, Aeffner, Famke
, Martin, Nathan T.
, Black, Joshua C.
, Rudmann, Daniel G.
, Hendriks, Cris L. Luengo
, Wilson, Kristin
, Young, G. Dave
, Koegler, Sally R.
, Krueger, Joseph
, Gianani, Roberto
في
Analysis
/ Automation
/ Bias
/ Biological markers
/ Biomarkers
/ Biomarkers - analysis
/ Blood pressure
/ Clinical decision making
/ Cognitive ability
/ Decision making
/ Handbooks
/ Histology
/ Histopathology
/ Humans
/ Hypertension
/ Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
/ Image processing
/ Immunohistochemistry - methods
/ Paradigms
/ Pathology
/ Pathology, Clinical - methods
/ Preferences
/ Studies
/ Therapeutics
2017
يرجى العلم أن الكتاب الذي طلبته لا يمكن استعارته. إذا كنت ترغب في إستعارة هذا الكتاب ، يمكنك حجز نسخة أخرى
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
Journal Article
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
2017
الطلب من المخزن الآلي
واختر طريقة الاستلام
نظرة عامة
- Novel therapeutics often target complex cellular mechanisms. Increasingly, quantitative methods like digital tissue image analysis (tIA) are required to evaluate correspondingly complex biomarkers to elucidate subtle phenotypes that can inform treatment decisions with these targeted therapies. These tIA systems need a gold standard, or reference method, to establish analytical validity. Conventional, subjective histopathologic scores assigned by an experienced pathologist are the gold standard in anatomic pathology and are an attractive reference method. The pathologist's score can establish the ground truth to assess a tIA solution's analytical performance. The paradox of this validation strategy, however, is that tIA is often used to assist pathologists to score complex biomarkers because it is more objective and reproducible than manual evaluation alone by overcoming known biases in a human's visual evaluation of tissue, and because it can generate endpoints that cannot be generated by a human observer.
- To discuss common visual and cognitive traps known in traditional pathology-based scoring paradigms that may impact characterization of tIA-assisted scoring accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
- This manuscript reviews the current literature from the past decades available for traditional subjective pathology scoring paradigms and known cognitive and visual traps relevant to these scoring paradigms.
- Awareness of the gold standard paradox is necessary when using traditional pathologist scores to analytically validate a tIA tool because image analysis is used specifically to overcome known sources of bias in visual assessment of tissue sections.
الناشر
College of American Pathologists
يستخدم هذا الموقع ملفات تعريف الارتباط لضمان حصولك على أفضل تجربة على موقعنا.