Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
LanguageLanguage
-
SubjectSubject
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersIs Peer Reviewed
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Institute of Physical Geography [Frankfurt am Main] "
Sort by:
Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams
by
Institute of Physical Geography [Frankfurt am Main] ; Goethe University Frankfurt = Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
,
Lehner, Bernhard
,
Tockner, Klement
in
704/242
,
704/286
,
706/2805
2021
Flowing waters have a unique role in supporting global biodiversity, biogeochemical cycles and human societies(1-5). Although the importance of permanent watercourses is well recognized, the prevalence, value and fate of non-perennial rivers and streams that periodically cease to flow tend to be overlooked, if not ignored(6-8). This oversight contributes to the degradation of the main source of water and livelihood for millions of people(5). Here we predict that water ceases to flow for at least one day per year along 51-60 per cent of the world's rivers by length, demonstrating that non-perennial rivers and streams are the rule rather than the exception on Earth. Leveraging global information on the hydrology, climate, geology and surrounding land cover of the Earth's river network, we show that non-perennial rivers occur within all climates and biomes, and on every continent. Our findings challenge the assumptions underpinning foundational river concepts across scientific disciplines(9). To understand and adequately manage the world's flowing waters, their biodiversity and functional integrity, a paradigm shift is needed towards a new conceptual model of rivers that includes flow intermittence. By mapping the distribution of non-perennial rivers and streams, we provide a stepping-stone towards addressing this grand challenge in freshwater science.
Journal Article
Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies
by
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) ; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
,
Department of Physical Geography ; Goethe University Frankfurt = Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
,
Department of Atmospheric Sciences ; Yonsei University
in
Atmosphere - chemistry
,
Atmospheric models
,
Biomass
2014
We analysed the responses of 11 ecosystem models to elevated atmospheric [CO2] (eCO2) at two temperate forest ecosystems (Duke and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments) to test alternative representations of carbon (C)–nitrogen (N) cycle processes. * We decomposed the model responses into component processes affecting the response to eCO2 and confronted these with observations from the FACE experiments. * Most of the models reproduced the observed initial enhancement of net primary production (NPP) at both sites, but none was able to simulate both the sustained 10-yr enhancement at Duke and the declining response at ORNL: models generally showed signs of progressive N limitation as a result of lower than observed plant N uptake. Nonetheless, many models showed qualitative agreement with observed component processes. The results suggest that improved representation of above-ground–below-ground interactions and better constraints on plant stoichiometry are important for a predictive understanding of eCO2 effects. Improved accuracy of soil organic matter inventories is pivotal to reduce uncertainty in the observed C–N budgets. * The two FACE experiments are insufficient to fully constrain terrestrial responses to eCO2, given the complexity of factors leading to the observed diverging trends, and the consequential inability of the models to explain these trends. Nevertheless, the ecosystem models were able to capture important features of the experiments, lending some support to their projections.
Journal Article